Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.5x · EV/EBITDA 7.2x · ROE -9.6%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $92M | $171M | $272M | $312M | $292M | $123M | $275M | $1.2B | $801M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $2.4B | $2.2B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $2.3B | $2.1B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35.27 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 25.26 | 1.15 | 5.58 | 1.91 | 1.40 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 1.03 | 0.59 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.62 | 1.15 | 2.64 | — | — | — | — | 7.96 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.44 | 0.81 | 1.43 | — | — | — | — | 5.23 | 5.74 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.04 | 3.63 | 5.46 | 193.22 | 16.16 | 26.47 | 3.74 | 3.61 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.20 | 7.48 | 9.55 | 17.33 | — | — | — | 6.70 | 6.75 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 29.00 | 30.33 | 66.11 | — | — | — | — | 13.30 | 14.71 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.23 | 22.51 | — | — | — | — | 15.64 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 67.1% | 67.1% | 65.0% | 61.3% | -582.0% | 23.0% | -61.8% | 76.8% | 77.5% | 75.9% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 10.1% | 6.0% | -6.5% | -2400.6% | -179.3% | -568.9% | 28.4% | 24.1% | 14.9% | -12.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.5% | -8.5% | -15.1% | -30.0% | -2826.9% | -236.3% | -653.6% | 5.4% | -3.8% | -14.2% | -57.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -9.6% | -9.6% | -14.1% | -16.6% | -35.9% | -22.8% | -26.5% | 2.7% | -2.1% | -9.8% | -25.9% |
| ROA | -2.0% | -2.0% | -3.1% | -3.9% | -9.4% | -7.9% | -11.2% | 1.2% | -0.8% | -2.6% | -7.6% |
| ROIC | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.0% | -0.8% | -7.8% | -5.9% | -9.1% | 5.4% | 4.1% | 2.5% | -1.5% |
| ROCE | 2.6% | 2.6% | 1.3% | -0.9% | -8.6% | -6.4% | -10.2% | 7.2% | 5.4% | 2.9% | -1.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.57 | 3.57 | 3.37 | 3.22 | 2.80 | 2.23 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.19 | 2.70 | 2.44 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.26 | 7.26 | 8.95 | 16.73 | — | — | — | 4.14 | 5.26 | 7.79 | 17.01 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.38 | 3.17 | 2.91 | 2.21 | 1.70 | 0.81 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 2.23 | 2.03 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.88 | 6.88 | 8.43 | 15.11 | — | — | — | 3.29 | 4.13 | 6.43 | 14.14 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 13.07 | 19.87 | — | — | — | — | 7.67 | — | 67.34 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.26 | -0.13 | -2.91 | -2.32 | -2.88 | 1.33 | 0.87 | 0.52 | -0.52 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 2.02 | 2.24 | 2.21 | 3.75 | 4.14 | 1.05 | 2.59 | 2.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 1.98 | 2.22 | 2.19 | 3.69 | 4.04 | 1.02 | 2.53 | 2.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 1.45 | 2.06 | 1.96 | 3.55 | 2.99 | 0.79 | 2.01 | 1.74 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | 26.20 | 26.20 | 30.64 | 29.94 | 15.38 | 14.11 | 8.56 | 14.88 | 12.95 | 12.84 | 17.56 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1.38 | 1.30 | 35.43 | 15.30 | 54.46 | 80.32 | 36.92 | 28.15 | 27.16 | 3.78 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 86.8% | 37.9% | — | — | — | — | 12.6% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $48M | $48M | $48M | $49M | $23M | $23M | $60M | $48M | $74M | $74M |
Persistent Negative Net Margins
According to current market data, MSC trades at a P/S ratio of 0.13 and a P/B of 0.15, suggesting that investors are heavily discounting the company's equity due to its persistent inability to generate positive net income compared to its diversified Macau peers.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio highlights that the market is currently pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented resort operator. This valuation gap relative to larger concessionaires suggests that the market remains skeptical of the company's ability to achieve sustainable profitability despite the recent completion of its Phase 2 expansion.
Based on reported figures, ROIC has remained negligible, hovering near 0.2% to 0.7% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company is failing to generate adequate returns on its massive capital investment in the Cotai property infrastructure.
The persistent decay in returns on invested capital suggests that the high fixed-cost base and depreciation from the Phase 2 expansion are overwhelming the company's operational output. Investors should monitor whether future utilization of the new hotel towers can drive a meaningful inflection in capital efficiency, or if the current asset base remains structurally over-capitalized.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 8 days in 2025Q4, which reflects a volatile management of payables and receivables that appears disconnected from the company's underlying revenue generation capacity in the competitive Macau gaming market.
The low asset turnover ratio of 0.06 indicates that the company is struggling to generate sufficient revenue relative to its substantial property, plant, and equipment base. This inefficiency suggests that the property's unique entertainment-heavy infrastructure may be underutilized, requiring higher foot traffic to justify the current scale of operations.
According to recent SEC filings, the current ratio has deteriorated from 2.88 in 2023Q3 to 0.73 in 2025Q4, signaling that the company's ability to meet short-term obligations has become increasingly compromised as cash reserves are depleted by ongoing operational losses and debt service requirements.
The decline in the quick ratio to 0.68 further underscores a tightening liquidity position that leaves little room for error in a cyclical industry. This trend warrants close investigation, as the company may face increasing pressure to secure additional financing or rely on parent company support to maintain its current operational footprint.
As noted in industry analysis, the EV/EBITDA multiple is frequently misapplied to MSC, as it obscures the company's unique service-agreement structure and the heavy depreciation burden that characterizes its specific entertainment-led business model compared to traditional casino operators.
Using standard gaming multiples fails to account for the fact that MSC does not hold its own gaming concession, leading to a distortion in how operating cash flow is perceived. Analysts should instead focus on property-level EBITDA and non-gaming revenue growth to better assess the true underlying productivity of the Studio City asset.
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MSC stock.
Studio City International Holdings Limited's current P/E ratio is -1.5x. The historical average is 35.3x.
Studio City International Holdings Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 7.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.6x.
Studio City International Holdings Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -9.6%. The historical average is -16.6%.
Based on historical data, Studio City International Holdings Limited is trading at a P/E of -1.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Studio City International Holdings Limited has 67.1% gross margin and 10.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Studio City International Holdings Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.