Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 124.9x · EV/EBITDA 36.0x · ROE 9.0%. (2009–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.6B | $4.1B | $11.2B | $8.4B | $2.7B | $2.9B | $3.4B | $1.3B | $2.9B | $3.5B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.6B | $5.1B | $11.0B | $8.3B | $2.7B | $2.9B | $3.3B | $1.2B | $2.7B | $3.3B | $1.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 124.89 | 79.34 | 118.06 | 38.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.33 | 3.92 | 11.47 | 10.74 | 4.58 | 9.58 | 20.64 | 2.46 | 5.91 | 5.16 | 4.07 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 9.29 | 7.52 | 3.10 | 3.25 | 3.78 | 1.46 | 2.11 | 2.23 | 1.30 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 64.68 | 74.40 | 177.55 | — | 50.12 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 30.51 | 22.40 | 60.57 | 66.81 | 84.40 | 485.21 | 49.65 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.86 | 11.19 | 10.60 | 4.50 | 9.59 | 20.08 | 2.25 | 5.54 | 4.88 | 3.84 |
| EV / EBITDA | 36.03 | 27.90 | 74.49 | 89.72 | 52.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 42.55 | 32.95 | 82.45 | 74.94 | 596.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 63.11 | 73.46 | 174.36 | — | 48.77 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 55.9% | 55.9% | 72.0% | 72.5% | 70.1% | 80.7% | 86.4% | 69.8% | 64.3% | 74.0% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 14.7% | 12.3% | 8.3% | 4.0% | -10.0% | -41.4% | -83.9% | -31.5% | -32.5% | -30.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.0% | 5.0% | 9.7% | 27.7% | -1.9% | -14.9% | -34.0% | -87.5% | -34.5% | -32.3% | -24.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.0% | 9.0% | 8.2% | 21.8% | -1.3% | -5.1% | -6.3% | -40.3% | -11.5% | -14.7% | -14.9% |
| ROA | 2.9% | 2.9% | 5.5% | 14.4% | -0.8% | -3.5% | -4.7% | -33.8% | -10.1% | -13.2% | -11.3% |
| ROIC | 12.4% | 12.4% | 9.2% | 5.3% | 2.1% | -2.7% | -6.5% | -33.2% | -9.0% | -12.3% | -13.2% |
| ROCE | 11.6% | 11.6% | 9.2% | 5.7% | 2.3% | -2.7% | -6.7% | -37.8% | -10.4% | -14.7% | -16.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.74 | 7.74 | 1.61 | 2.40 | 4.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | -0.23 | -0.09 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.10 | -0.12 | -0.13 | -0.12 | -0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.40 | 5.40 | -1.85 | -1.14 | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -1.57 | -0.93 | -3.19 | — | -1.35 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.47 | 1.47 | 7.52 | 6.24 | 0.26 | -4.34 | -12.76 | -72.47 | -230.58 | -241.19 | -6.84 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.05 | 3.05 | 1.85 | 2.88 | 1.48 | 3.09 | 2.58 | 1.55 | 2.15 | 2.70 | 1.96 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.05 | 3.05 | 1.85 | 2.88 | 1.48 | 3.09 | 2.58 | 1.55 | 2.15 | 2.70 | 1.96 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.23 | 2.23 | 1.32 | 2.04 | 1.06 | 2.50 | 2.19 | 0.93 | 1.53 | 1.95 | 1.32 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.29 |
| Inventory Turnover | 752.50 | 752.50 | 755.78 | 986.65 | 7102.68 | 5340.91 | 557.70 | 4286.67 | 286.16 | 295.10 | 692.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 57.02 | 56.26 | 45.33 | 42.37 | 43.13 | 56.23 | 41.28 | 41.25 | 39.74 | 28.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.8% | 1.3% | 0.8% | 2.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 1.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | — | 2.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $110M | $115M | $118M | $111M | $108M | $107M | $105M | $104M | $100M | $53M |
Negative equity and leverage
Based on current market data, MMYT trades at a forward P/E of 122.21, a multiple that appears significantly detached from its recent revenue growth deceleration and suggests investors are pricing in an aggressive, potentially optimistic, long-term recovery in profitability that remains unproven by current quarterly performance metrics.
The company's valuation multiples, particularly the forward P/E, imply a growth premium that is difficult to justify given the recent cooling in top-line expansion. Investors should consider whether this pricing reflects a genuine expectation of future margin expansion or merely a lack of comparable high-growth Indian travel assets available for public investment.
As reported in financial statements, MMYT's ROIC has hovered in the low single digits, reaching only 3.2% in 2026Q4, which indicates that the company is struggling to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the typical cost of capital for a consumer-facing technology platform in India.
The persistent inability to drive ROIC above mid-single digits suggests that the company's capital allocation, while focused on market share, has not yet translated into a compounding engine for shareholders. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current asset base is bloated or if the competitive environment prevents the realization of higher returns.
According to recent quarterly filings, MMYT maintains a negative cash conversion cycle, reaching -75 days in 2026Q4, which highlights the company's ability to leverage supplier payment terms to fund operations, though this efficiency is increasingly offset by the volatility in its underlying asset turnover ratios.
While a negative CCC is a hallmark of a successful OTA model, the extreme fluctuations in DPO and DSO suggest that the company's liquidity is highly sensitive to the timing of payments from airline partners and hotel suppliers. This reliance on supplier credit may become a structural risk if the company's bargaining power wanes during periods of industry-wide capacity contraction.
Based on reported figures, the company's leverage profile has shifted significantly, with debt-to-EBITDA rising to 30.03 in 2026Q4, a level that indicates a substantial increase in financial risk and suggests that the company's ability to service its obligations is becoming increasingly dependent on volatile operational cash flows.
The rapid escalation in debt, coupled with the erosion of the equity base, creates a precarious balance sheet structure that limits management's ability to navigate future industry downturns. Investors should monitor the interest coverage ratio closely, as any further decline could signal a need for dilutive capital raises or restrictive refinancing terms.
As noted in financial disclosures, the most commonly misapplied metric for MMYT is GAAP Net Income, which frequently obscures the company's true economic performance due to the inconsistent reporting of gross versus net revenue across its diverse travel segments and the impact of non-recurring capital allocation decisions.
Analysts should prioritize 'Adjusted Margin' and 'Free Cash Flow' over net income to better understand the company's underlying unit economics. Relying on net income in this business model risks misinterpreting the impact of marketing spend and the timing of commission recognition, both of which are critical to assessing the sustainability of the company's current growth trajectory.
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MMYT stock.
MakeMyTrip Limited's current P/E ratio is 124.9x. The historical average is 110.5x. This places it at the 80th percentile of its historical range.
MakeMyTrip Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 36.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 61.2x.
MakeMyTrip Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 9.0%. The historical average is -9.8%.
Based on historical data, MakeMyTrip Limited is trading at a P/E of 124.9x. This is at the 80th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MakeMyTrip Limited has 55.9% gross margin and 14.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
MakeMyTrip Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.