VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
MITQ
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
MITQMoving iMage Technologies, Inc.
$0.57$6M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. MITQ
  4. Financial Ratios

Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. (MITQ) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -17.9%. (2017–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

MITQ Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Market Cap$6M$6M$7M$13M$14M—————
Enterprise Value$1M$2M$1M$7M$12M—————
P/E Ratio →-5.96—————————
P/S Ratio0.310.350.320.630.77—————
P/B Ratio1.161.301.141.691.50—————
P/FCF12.9614.49—50.31——————
P/OCF12.9614.49—47.51——————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

MITQ EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
EV / Revenue—0.100.070.330.64—————
EV / EBITDA——————————
EV / EBIT——————————
EV / FCF—4.03—25.96——————

MITQ Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Gross Margin25.2%25.2%23.3%26.3%24.3%23.3%26.5%25.8%21.0%23.2%
Operating Margin-6.0%-6.0%-7.7%-9.8%-9.6%-21.5%-3.8%-0.2%2.2%0.7%
Net Profit Margin-5.2%-5.2%-6.8%-8.9%-7.3%-8.9%-5.4%-0.2%2.3%0.8%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
ROE-17.9%-17.9%-20.6%-21.2%-31.0%——-155.0%400.7%98.1%
ROA-8.9%-8.9%-11.5%-12.8%-13.1%-11.3%-17.0%-0.6%10.9%3.1%
ROIC-187.2%-187.2%-118.1%-35.0%-34.8%-202.9%————
ROCE-18.9%-18.9%-23.2%-23.0%-33.8%-143.1%-113.0%-195.0%377.7%90.6%

MITQ Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Debt / Equity0.240.240.030.06——————
Debt / EBITDA——————————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.94-0.90-0.82-0.25———-4.74-3.73
Net Debt / EBITDA————————-1.04-3.32
Debt / FCF—-10.46—-24.35————-0.93-0.95
Interest Coverage————-32.63-1.72-2.36—559.00—

Net cash position: cash ($6M) exceeds total debt ($1M)

MITQ Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Current Ratio1.841.842.062.212.470.710.780.941.011.02
Quick Ratio1.441.441.411.421.720.380.430.590.590.57
Cash Ratio1.121.121.101.181.240.270.230.120.110.12
Asset Turnover—1.671.911.521.241.262.874.304.713.99
Inventory Turnover6.576.574.963.373.443.627.558.939.107.01
Days Sales Outstanding—29.4518.9916.3535.0522.8718.0438.3235.2738.83

MITQ Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Dividend Yield——————————
Payout Ratio————————106.2%—

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Earnings Yield——————————
FCF Yield7.7%6.9%—2.0%——————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%8.1%2.4%0.0%—————
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%8.1%2.4%0.0%—————
Shares Outstanding—$10M$10M$11M$11M$6M$6M$6M$6M$5M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeContracting
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Cinema CAPEX cycle dependency

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q3)

Market Pricing Reflects Distressed Outlook

Based on reported figures, MITQ trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.31, which suggests that the market is heavily discounting the firm's future growth prospects and potential for a successful pivot toward higher-margin software solutions within the competitive communication equipment sector.

The negative P/E ratio of -5.86 underscores the company's current inability to generate consistent bottom-line earnings, effectively rendering traditional earnings-based valuation metrics irrelevant for investors. This low P/S multiple appears to reflect a market consensus that views the company as a legacy hardware player rather than a scalable technology firm.

Capital Efficiency Remains Structurally Impaired

As reported in financial statements, MITQ's ROIC has experienced extreme volatility, plummeting to -3.1% in 2026Q3, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its core engineering and integration operations.

The erratic nature of these returns, including a brief positive spike in 2026Q1, suggests that the business model is highly sensitive to project-based revenue timing rather than sustainable operational efficiency. Investors should monitor whether management can stabilize these returns as the company attempts to shift its product mix toward proprietary offerings.

Working Capital Cycles Signal Operational Friction

According to recent SEC filings, MITQ's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 78 days in 2026Q3, which highlights the inherent difficulty in managing inventory and receivables within a project-heavy business model that lacks consistent, recurring revenue streams.

The high days inventory outstanding, which peaked at 169 days in 2024Q2, suggests that the company may be struggling with inventory obsolescence risks as cinema technology evolves rapidly. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a primary driver of the company's persistent cash burn and liquidity pressure.

Liquidity Buffer Facing Persistent Erosion

Based on the company's reported figures, the current ratio of 2.33 in 2026Q3 provides a superficial appearance of stability, yet the rapid depletion of cash reserves suggests that the firm's actual liquidity position is far more vulnerable than the headline ratio implies.

While the quick ratio of 1.35 indicates that the company holds sufficient liquid assets to cover immediate obligations, the persistent negative free cash flow suggests that this buffer is being consumed to fund ongoing operating losses. Investors should be wary of the company's ability to sustain these operations without further dilutive financing.

Misapplied Focus on Current Ratio

The current ratio is frequently misapplied to MITQ's business model, as it obscures the underlying reality that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in slow-moving inventory that may face rapid technological obsolescence in the cinema equipment market.

Analysts should instead prioritize the quick ratio or a cash-burn-adjusted liquidity metric to better assess the company's true runway. Relying on the current ratio risks overestimating the firm's ability to meet short-term obligations if the market for its specific hardware components experiences a sudden, structural decline.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

MITQ — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MITQ stock.

What is Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -6.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.'s ROE?

Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -17.9%. The historical average is 36.2%.

Is MITQ stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -6.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.'s profit margins?

Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. has 25.2% gross margin and -6.0% operating margin.