Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 43.9x · EV/EBITDA 31.7x · ROE 71.7%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.4B | $10.6B | $16.8B | $13.5B | $7.7B | $10.0B | $6.8B | $5.2B | $2.8B | $3.4B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.2B | $10.4B | $16.6B | $13.2B | $7.5B | $9.8B | $6.6B | $5.1B | $2.7B | $3.3B | $3.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 43.94 | 48.14 | 76.99 | 76.35 | 59.80 | 90.40 | 77.34 | 60.42 | 26.82 | 29.49 | 30.83 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.66 | 9.78 | 16.12 | 14.52 | 10.04 | 15.07 | 11.54 | 8.40 | 5.03 | 5.78 | 6.32 |
| P/B Ratio | 30.68 | 33.62 | 56.18 | 48.44 | 33.94 | 39.90 | 30.91 | 36.49 | 19.13 | 19.66 | 22.56 |
| P/FCF | 25.05 | 28.29 | 58.69 | 55.82 | 44.48 | 55.21 | 48.98 | 39.42 | 21.65 | 21.79 | 28.84 |
| P/OCF | 24.06 | 27.17 | 56.96 | 54.75 | 42.85 | 54.01 | 48.03 | 35.34 | 20.49 | 20.96 | 27.42 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.58 | 15.91 | 14.24 | 9.76 | 14.71 | 11.24 | 8.28 | 4.86 | 5.57 | 6.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 31.67 | 35.86 | 61.91 | 61.34 | 46.98 | 68.62 | 53.57 | 41.27 | 19.06 | 17.02 | 18.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 32.38 | 36.25 | 63.40 | 63.02 | 49.03 | 72.66 | 57.77 | 44.11 | 20.28 | 17.57 | 19.00 |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.71 | 57.93 | 54.78 | 43.26 | 53.88 | 47.70 | 38.82 | 20.88 | 20.99 | 28.12 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 55.7% | 54.2% | 53.0% | 52.4% | 53.9% | 52.4% | 52.6% | 55.4% | 57.1% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 26.1% | 25.1% | 22.6% | 19.9% | 20.2% | 19.5% | 18.8% | 23.9% | 31.2% | 32.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 20.3% | 20.3% | 20.9% | 19.0% | 16.8% | 16.6% | 14.9% | 13.9% | 18.7% | 19.6% | 20.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 71.7% | 71.7% | 75.6% | 69.9% | 54.0% | 47.1% | 48.3% | 59.3% | 65.0% | 67.7% | 68.1% |
| ROA | 27.5% | 27.5% | 30.5% | 28.4% | 23.2% | 22.0% | 20.8% | 25.2% | 33.7% | 38.1% | 39.1% |
| ROIC | 236.8% | 236.8% | 370.5% | 774.8% | 898.3% | 386.5% | 161.3% | 155.2% | 206.1% | 226.1% | 193.2% |
| ROCE | 76.3% | 76.3% | 78.7% | 74.7% | 56.0% | 48.1% | 49.7% | 65.8% | 75.9% | 100.3% | 99.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.23 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.26 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.69 | -0.73 | -0.91 | -0.93 | -0.96 | -0.81 | -0.55 | -0.67 | -0.72 | -0.56 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.75 | -0.75 | -0.82 | -1.17 | -1.33 | -1.69 | -1.44 | -0.63 | -0.70 | -0.64 | -0.47 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.58 | -0.76 | -1.05 | -1.22 | -1.33 | -1.28 | -0.59 | -0.76 | -0.80 | -0.72 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($329M) exceeds total debt ($112M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.26 | 1.31 | 1.32 | 1.64 | 1.70 | 1.28 | 1.48 | 1.84 | 1.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.26 | 1.31 | 1.32 | 1.64 | 1.70 | 1.28 | 1.48 | 1.84 | 1.76 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 1.01 | 0.81 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.29 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.35 | 1.23 | 1.26 | 1.66 | 1.82 | 1.89 | 2.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.46 | 73.77 | 71.74 | 79.66 | 69.86 | 67.98 | 59.62 | 65.35 | 56.62 | 60.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.3% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 3.2% |
| FCF Yield | 4.0% | 3.5% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 3.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.4% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.6% | 2.3% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 4.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.4% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.6% | 2.3% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 4.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $61M | $62M | $63M | $63M | $64M | $64M | $65M | $66M | $69M | $72M |
Implementation Talent Bottleneck
According to current market data, MANH trades at a forward P/E of 25.71, which, when compared to its historical averages and broader software peers, suggests that investors are pricing in a premium for the company's specialized, cloud-native supply chain execution platform and its consistent, high-margin cash generation.
The current valuation multiple appears to reflect a market expectation of sustained, high-quality earnings growth despite the ongoing transition to a subscription-based model. Investors should monitor whether the PEG ratio of 1.78 remains justifiable if top-line growth continues to moderate, as the current multiple leaves little room for execution errors in the implementation pipeline.
Based on reported financial figures, MANH has maintained an impressive ROIC, which peaked at 127.5% in 2023Q4 and remains robust at 73.2% in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is compounding capital at a rate significantly higher than its cost of capital, largely due to its asset-light, software-centric business model.
The company's ability to generate such high returns on invested capital suggests that its 'Active' platform requires minimal incremental capital to scale, effectively turning the business into a compounding machine. This trend warrants further investigation into whether these returns can be sustained as the company shifts more resources toward the labor-intensive professional services required for cloud deployments.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, MANH's asset turnover has remained relatively consistent, hovering between 0.34 and 0.40 over the last ten quarters, which suggests that the company is maintaining a stable relationship between its asset base and revenue generation despite the ongoing shift toward recurring cloud subscription revenue.
The stability in asset turnover, combined with a disciplined approach to managing receivables, indicates that the company is not experiencing significant friction in its cash conversion cycle. Investors should monitor the DSO, which has fluctuated between 67 and 74 days, as any sustained increase could signal potential delays in client payments or challenges in the implementation-to-billing process.
According to the provided balance sheet data, MANH maintains a fortress-like capital structure with a debt-to-equity ratio that has remained below 0.40 for the past ten quarters, providing the company with significant optionality to fund organic growth or return capital to shareholders without relying on external financing.
The minimal reliance on debt is a strategic advantage that allows the company to navigate macroeconomic volatility without the pressure of interest coverage requirements. This conservative stance appears to be a deliberate management choice that prioritizes long-term stability over aggressive, debt-fueled expansion, which is particularly prudent given the cyclical nature of the retail and supply chain sectors.
As evidenced by the company's financial statements, the P/E ratio is a commonly misapplied metric for MANH because it fails to account for the 'revenue trough' created by the transition from perpetual licenses to ratable cloud subscriptions, which artificially suppresses near-term earnings and inflates the headline valuation multiple.
Investors should instead focus on metrics like RPO growth and free cash flow margins, which provide a more accurate picture of the company's underlying earning power and future revenue visibility. Relying solely on P/E may lead to an incorrect assessment of the company's growth trajectory, as it ignores the long-term value being built within the deferred revenue and subscription backlog.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MANH stock.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 43.9x. The historical average is 50.9x. This places it at the 54th percentile of its historical range.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 31.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 28.5x.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 71.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 37.3%.
Based on historical data, Manhattan Associates, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 43.9x. This is at the 54th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Manhattan Associates, Inc. has 55.7% gross margin and 26.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.