Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 24.0x · EV/EBITDA 3.3x · ROE 2.8%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.6B | $4.2B | $2.9B | $3.6B | $3.9B | $8.8B | $6.6B | $5.4B | $5.9B | $9.8B | $9.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.0B | $11.17T | $12.59T | $14.35T | $13.24T | $9.22T | $15.7B | $14.3B | $6.20T | $3.01T | $3.23T |
| P/E Ratio → | 24.03 | 0.02 | — | — | — | 0.01 | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| P/FCF | 8342.62 | 6.45 | 0.01 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | 0.06 | — |
| P/OCF | 3401.55 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.32 | 2.23 | 2.76 | 8.42 | 5.36 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.70 | 0.53 | 0.75 |
| EV / EBIT | 32.12 | 9.20 | — | — | — | 4.28 | — | — | — | 1.24 | 2.26 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17113.94 | 40.86 | — | — | 3.40 | — | — | — | 17.32 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.1% | 13.1% | 9.7% | 1.6% | 4.3% | 17.8% | 10.9% | 8.0% | 12.7% | 19.3% | 14.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 2.0% | -2.1% | -11.8% | -8.0% | 7.5% | -0.2% | -5.8% | 0.4% | 8.9% | 4.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.9% | 0.9% | -9.6% | -12.8% | -11.7% | 4.0% | -0.4% | -12.1% | -0.9% | 6.5% | 3.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.8% | 2.8% | -30.4% | -27.2% | -23.6% | 16.1% | -842.4% | -38.0% | -1.4% | 12.7% | 6.9% |
| ROA | 0.8% | 0.8% | -7.5% | -7.7% | -8.3% | 6.2% | -300.9% | -17.0% | -0.7% | 6.7% | 3.8% |
| ROIC | 2.0% | 2.0% | -1.9% | -7.9% | -6.4% | 13.9% | -135.0% | -9.7% | 0.4% | 10.7% | 6.0% |
| ROCE | 3.0% | 3.0% | -2.9% | -11.5% | -9.1% | 18.4% | -168.0% | -11.7% | 0.4% | 13.0% | 7.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.81 | 1.89 | 1.33 | 0.86 | 1.11 | 1.09 | 0.57 | 0.37 | 0.35 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.55 | 2.55 | 3.20 | 9.75 | 6.09 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 2.35 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.42 | 1.56 | 1.64 | 1.17 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.23 | 2.23 | 2.76 | 8.42 | 5.35 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 0.53 | 0.74 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 17107.48 | 40.85 | — | — | 3.39 | — | — | — | 17.27 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.70 | 1.70 | -1.41 | -3.62 | -7.28 | 4.96 | -735.43 | -21409.81 | -0.13 | 26.76 | 12.48 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 1.17 | 1.49 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.90 | 1.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.96 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 751.59 | 763.14 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 1.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.81 | 8.81 | 9.00 | 8.30 | 11015.82 | 8718.75 | 10822.85 | 12182.25 | 7.90 | 9.54 | 9.95 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 36.17 | 53.58 | 57.76 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 42.43 | 56.81 | 68.28 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | 100.0% | — | — | — | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.9% | 19.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.2% | 5380.0% | — | — | — | 14228.2% | — | — | — | 18306.7% | 9859.9% |
| FCF Yield | 0.0% | 15.5% | 10649.2% | — | — | 30939.1% | — | — | — | 1764.7% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.0B | $942M | $743M | $779M | $869M | $779M | $779M | $716M | $716M | $716M |
High fixed-cost operating leverage
According to recent market data, LPL trades at a P/S ratio of 0.23 and an EV/EBITDA of 3.41, suggesting that investors are heavily discounting the company's future earnings potential due to persistent margin volatility and the ongoing, capital-intensive transition toward high-end OLED display technologies.
The extremely low P/S multiple indicates that the market assigns little value to the company's top-line growth, likely fearing that revenue gains will be offset by the high costs of OLED production. The forward P/E of 0.10 appears anomalous and warrants caution, as it likely reflects extreme earnings instability rather than genuine undervaluation.
Based on reported financial statements, LPL's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive momentum, fluctuating from a peak of 16.5% in 2025Q3 to a marginal 0.6% in 2026Q1, which underscores the difficulty of generating sustainable returns on the massive capital deployed into fabrication facilities.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the company is failing to compound capital effectively, as the benefits of yield improvements are frequently eroded by cyclical price declines. Investors should monitor whether the shift toward automotive and IT panels can eventually stabilize these returns above the company's cost of capital.
As reported in quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has exhibited significant volatility, ranging from 0 to 16 days over the last ten quarters, reflecting the company's ongoing struggle to optimize inventory and receivables in a highly cyclical and competitive consumer electronics display market.
The inconsistency in the CCC suggests that LPL lacks the leverage to dictate terms to its major OEM customers or suppliers, leaving it vulnerable to inventory build-ups during demand downturns. This inefficiency directly contributes to the observed cash flow volatility and necessitates a more disciplined approach to working capital management.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, LPL's current ratio has remained consistently below 1.0, reaching 0.72 in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company's short-term assets may be insufficient to cover its immediate liabilities without relying on continuous access to external credit markets.
This liquidity profile is particularly concerning given the company's high fixed-cost structure and the potential for rapid cash outflows during industry downturns. The reliance on external financing to bridge these gaps suggests a vulnerable financial position that could be tested if credit conditions tighten or if panel prices remain depressed.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for LPL, as it obscures the company's true earning power by failing to account for the massive non-cash depreciation charges inherent in its capital-intensive fabrication business model, which frequently distorts bottom-line net income figures.
Analysts should instead prioritize EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to better understand the company's operational cash generation capabilities, as these metrics strip away the accounting noise of depreciation and amortization. Relying on P/E in this context may lead to erroneous conclusions about the company's valuation, as it ignores the significant capital reinvestment required to remain competitive.
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LPL stock.
LG Display Co., Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 24.0x. The historical average is 0.0x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
LG Display Co., Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 3.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 1.5x.
LG Display Co., Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 2.8%. The historical average is 4.8%.
Based on historical data, LG Display Co., Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 24.0x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
LG Display Co., Ltd. has 13.1% gross margin and 2.0% operating margin.
LG Display Co., Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.