Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 34.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 3.9%. (2024–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $308M | $302M | $271M |
| Enterprise Value | $308M | $301M | $270M |
| P/E Ratio → | 34.61 | 33.84 | 129.05 |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.33 | 1.30 | 1.21 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 121.96 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 121.96 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.9% | 3.9% | 1.0% |
| ROA | 3.7% | 3.7% | 0.9% |
| ROIC | -0.3% | -0.3% | — |
| ROCE | -0.4% | -0.4% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.00 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -0.42 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($250079) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.30 | 2.30 | 12.42 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.30 | 2.30 | 12.42 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.60 | 1.60 | 10.27 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.9% | 3.0% | 0.8% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $29M | $27M |
Liquidation and deal failure
Based on reported figures, the P/E ratio of 34.58 appears fundamentally disconnected from the company's lack of operational revenue, suggesting that current market pricing reflects speculative interest in the sponsor's deal-sourcing capabilities rather than any underlying earnings power or tangible asset value within the shell entity.
The elevated P/E ratio is likely an artifact of non-operating income rather than a reflection of growth prospects, as the company remains a pre-revenue shell. Investors should monitor whether this valuation premium persists as the liquidation deadline approaches, as it may indicate an over-optimistic market expectation regarding the quality of a potential future acquisition.
According to historical financial data, the ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -0.1% in 2026Q1, which highlights the structural inability of the entity to generate returns on invested capital while it remains in its current pre-merger, revenue-less state of existence.
The persistent negative ROIC reflects the ongoing administrative burn that is not being offset by any productive asset deployment. This trend suggests that capital is being consumed rather than compounded, which warrants further investigation into whether the sponsor can secure a target that provides sufficient returns to reverse this multi-year decay.
As reported in recent SEC filings, the current ratio has compressed sharply from 12.42 in 2024Q4 to 1.03 by 2026Q1, indicating that the company's ability to cover its immediate administrative obligations is rapidly deteriorating as the cash balance is depleted by ongoing professional and compliance expenses.
The rapid decline in the current ratio suggests that the entity is approaching a point of operational fragility where it may lack the necessary working capital to sustain its search for a target. Investors should be wary of potential dilution or debt-based financing if the sponsor is forced to replenish these reserves to avoid liquidation.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for this business model is the P/E ratio, which obscures the reality that the company currently lacks any operational revenue or core business activity, making traditional earnings-based valuation metrics entirely irrelevant to assessing the entity's true economic value or future potential.
Analysts should instead focus on the 'net cash per share' and the 'time to liquidation' as the primary indicators of value, as these metrics better capture the risk of capital loss and the sponsor's remaining window to execute a deal. Relying on P/E or other profitability ratios in a shell context may lead to a fundamental misunderstanding of the company's risk profile.
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LPBB stock.
Launch Two Acquisition Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 34.6x. The historical average is 81.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Launch Two Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.9%. The historical average is 2.4%.
Based on historical data, Launch Two Acquisition Corp. is trading at a P/E of 34.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.