Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -31.0%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10M | $18M | $187M | $532M | $496M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-3021890 | $5M | $185M | $528M | $472M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.21 | 0.37 | 7.35 | 23.65 | 14.03 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -31.0% | -31.0% | -28.5% | -53.2% | -47.1% | -11.1% | -3.4% | -28.3% |
| ROA | -26.3% | -26.3% | -24.3% | -48.4% | -43.7% | -9.5% | -3.2% | -26.2% |
| ROIC | -24.2% | -24.2% | -20.2% | -78.8% | -94.5% | -6.0% | -3.5% | -22.9% |
| ROCE | -23.5% | -23.5% | -21.9% | -54.6% | -52.9% | -8.4% | -4.5% | -28.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.27 | -0.10 | -0.17 | -0.67 | 0.07 | 0.01 | -0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1268.37 | -1268.37 | -1012.62 | -1037.71 | -59.81 | -2.94 | -90.30 | -493.86 |
Net cash position: cash ($13M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.19 | 3.19 | 1.69 | 1.61 | 14.05 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 1.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.19 | 3.19 | 1.69 | 1.61 | 14.05 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 1.46 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.78 | 2.78 | 1.30 | 1.25 | 13.36 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 1.40 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $20M | $18M | $16M | $13M | $13M | $13M |
Capital Dilution and Liquidity
According to recent financial data, the company trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.21, which suggests that the market is heavily discounting the carrying value of its exploration assets relative to its peers in the junior lithium mining sector.
The low P/B ratio indicates that investors are skeptical of the current book value of the Thompson Brothers property, likely reflecting the high risk associated with pre-revenue exploration projects. This valuation level suggests that the market is pricing in significant future dilution or a potential impairment of assets rather than immediate commercial potential.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -9.7% in 2025Q2, which underscores the inherent difficulty of generating returns on invested capital while the firm remains in the non-revenue-generating exploration and evaluation stage of its lifecycle.
The persistent negative ROIC is a structural reality for a company that has yet to achieve commercial production. Investors should monitor whether future capital allocation toward drilling and metallurgical testing can eventually lead to a positive return profile, though current trends suggest a continued reliance on external funding.
Based on the company's reported figures, the current ratio of 2.69 in 2025Q2 provides a temporary liquidity cushion, yet this metric is misleading as it does not account for the ongoing cash burn required to sustain exploration activities without any incoming revenue streams.
While the current ratio appears healthy compared to historical levels, the lack of operational cash flow means that liquidity is entirely dependent on the company's ability to raise additional equity. This reliance on external capital markets warrants further investigation into the company's runway and potential for future shareholder dilution.
As indicated by recent SEC filings, the current ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model, as it obscures the reality that the company's assets are largely illiquid exploration properties rather than working capital that can be easily converted to cash.
Using standard liquidity ratios for a pre-revenue explorer ignores the fact that the company cannot liquidate its primary assets to meet short-term obligations. Analysts should instead focus on the 'burn rate' and the 'months of cash remaining' to better assess the company's true financial viability and risk of insolvency.
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LITM stock.
Snow Lake Resources Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Snow Lake Resources Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -31.0%. The historical average is -29.0%.
Based on historical data, Snow Lake Resources Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.