Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.5x · EV/EBITDA 7.0x · ROE -45.5%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.2B | $914M | $774M | $949M | $1.0B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $2.2B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.4B | $10.1B | $8.3B | $8.2B | $8.2B | $8.4B | $8.9B | $9.3B | $7.6B | $8.1B | $8.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.50 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.56 | 0.42 | 0.63 | 0.91 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.42 | 0.86 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.43 |
| P/FCF | 7.26 | 2.99 | 3.59 | 3.04 | — | — | — | 6.57 | 38.95 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 2.76 | 1.13 | 1.02 | 1.06 | 1.19 | 1.65 | 2.10 | 2.36 | 1.93 | 3.94 | 5.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.28 | 1.86 | 1.82 | 1.71 | 1.74 | 2.36 | 2.42 | 2.06 | 2.26 | 2.93 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.04 | 6.23 | 9.01 | 5.39 | 8.23 | 8.13 | 8.77 | 7.69 | 9.46 | 12.55 | 8.80 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.89 | 2811.46 | — | 15.25 | 18.93 | 39.95 | — | 49.05 | — | — | 36.88 |
| EV / FCF | — | 33.09 | 38.39 | 26.36 | — | — | — | 28.41 | 188.73 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 67.5% | 66.5% | 66.6% | 64.0% | 63.9% | 66.3% | 66.6% | 76.0% | 75.6% | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 16.2% | -1.1% | 11.5% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 2.5% | 8.4% | -0.6% | -4.1% | 11.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -13.8% | -13.8% | -14.7% | -1.6% | -3.5% | -9.2% | -18.1% | -2.7% | -9.3% | -21.7% | -9.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -45.5% | -45.5% | -33.4% | -3.0% | -6.3% | -14.1% | -18.6% | -2.6% | -7.8% | -14.9% | -8.5% |
| ROA | -4.9% | -4.9% | -5.0% | -0.5% | -1.2% | -2.9% | -4.5% | -0.7% | -2.6% | -5.6% | -2.9% |
| ROIC | 5.6% | 5.6% | -0.4% | 4.0% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 2.3% | -0.2% | -1.0% | 3.5% |
| ROCE | 6.9% | 6.9% | -0.4% | 4.5% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 2.6% | -0.2% | -1.2% | 4.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 8.67 | 8.67 | 5.02 | 3.58 | 3.11 | 2.64 | 2.52 | 2.10 | 1.62 | 1.36 | 1.05 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.68 | 5.68 | 8.88 | 5.42 | 7.98 | 7.44 | 8.32 | 6.88 | 8.29 | 9.87 | 6.67 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 8.66 | 4.62 | 3.15 | 2.81 | 2.31 | 2.25 | 1.81 | 1.47 | 1.25 | 0.96 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.67 | 5.67 | 8.17 | 4.77 | 7.20 | 6.51 | 7.44 | 5.91 | 7.51 | 9.05 | 6.06 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 30.10 | 34.80 | 23.32 | — | — | — | 21.84 | 149.78 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.40 | -0.56 | 0.38 | -0.32 | -0.71 | 0.69 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.04 | 1.13 | 1.17 | 1.35 | 1.15 | 1.30 | 1.02 | 0.87 | 1.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.04 | 1.13 | 1.17 | 1.35 | 1.15 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 1.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.41 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.19 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.16 | 13.38 | 7.22 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.4% | 0.8% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 13.8% | 33.5% | 27.9% | 32.9% | — | — | — | 15.2% | 2.6% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.7% | 12.5% | 16.5% | 3.8% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 0.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.7% | 12.5% | 16.5% | 3.8% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 4.8% | 1.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $200M | $197M | $210M | $223M | $233M | $196M | $182M | $176M | $181M | $183M |
High leverage and refinancing
According to current market data, LILA’s negative TTM P/E of -2.33 and lack of a dividend yield suggest that investors are currently unable to anchor valuation to traditional earnings-based metrics, forcing a reliance on EV/EBITDA multiples to assess the company's underlying cash-generative capacity.
The absence of a dividend yield removes the primary return driver typically expected by utility-focused investors, leaving the stock as a pure play on potential operational turnaround. The negative P/E reflects the persistent GAAP losses, which may lead the market to apply a significant conglomerate discount until the company demonstrates consistent positive net income.
As reported in financial statements, the debt-to-capital ratio has reached 0.90, indicating that the company's capital structure is heavily skewed toward debt, which warrants close monitoring given the interest coverage ratio's frequent oscillation into negative territory during periods of operational stress.
The high debt-to-capital ratio suggests that the company has limited financial flexibility to absorb further operational shocks or fund necessary infrastructure upgrades. Investors should monitor the interest coverage ratio closely, as any sustained inability to cover interest payments from operating cash flow may necessitate further dilutive financing or asset divestitures.
Based on peer comparison data, LILA’s negative ROE and net margin profile contrast sharply with regional peers like Millicom, which maintains a 36.2% ROE, suggesting that LILA is currently underperforming in terms of capital efficiency and profitability within its core Latin American markets.
The valuation discount relative to peers appears justified by the company's inability to convert its extensive subsea network into consistent bottom-line growth. While peers like AMX demonstrate more stable margins, LILA’s operational friction in Puerto Rico and Chile continues to weigh on its relative performance metrics.
Analysis of the provided financial data suggests that the P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for LILA, as it obscures the company's heavy depreciation and amortization charges which are inherent to its capital-intensive subsea and fiber-to-the-home infrastructure business model.
Using P/E to evaluate LILA is misleading because it fails to account for the non-cash nature of the massive depreciation expenses that drive GAAP losses. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or free cash flow metrics to better understand the actual cash-generating potential of the underlying network assets.
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LILA stock.
Liberty Latin America Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -2.5x. The historical average is 31.2x.
Liberty Latin America Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.3x.
Liberty Latin America Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -45.5%. The historical average is -10.0%.
Based on historical data, Liberty Latin America Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -2.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Liberty Latin America Ltd. has 67.5% gross margin and 16.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Liberty Latin America Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.