Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -186.5%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18731 | $59087 | $133105 | $442000 | $280095 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7M | $7M | $4M | $3M | $3M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.01 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 1.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 57.0% | 56.0% | 53.6% | 1.8% | — | -6.3% | 38.5% | 70.1% | 100.0% | -72.8% |
| Operating Margin | -106.7% | -106.7% | -22.7% | -13.7% | -122.1% | — | 0.2% | -343.2% | -2507.4% | -1896.5% | -1131.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -209.3% | -209.3% | -22.9% | -14.0% | -122.5% | — | 0.2% | -324.4% | -2423.7% | -1863.5% | -1131.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -186.5% | -186.5% | — | — | -1.4% | 3.7% | 0.2% | -322.6% | -975.8% | — | -992.3% |
| ROA | -81.0% | -81.0% | -36.7% | -15.3% | -1.3% | 3.5% | 0.1% | -277.6% | -390.6% | -507.2% | -501.6% |
| ROIC | -57.7% | -57.7% | — | — | -1.0% | -0.1% | 0.1% | -305.4% | -4212.6% | — | -1208.8% |
| ROCE | -61.4% | -61.4% | — | — | -1.3% | -0.1% | 0.2% | -337.5% | -519.0% | -916.1% | -641.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.77 | — | — | — | -0.00 | -0.13 | -0.10 | -0.93 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -0.15 | -0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -90.44 | -52.93 | -348.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 9.11 | 2.41 | 2.72 | 8.30 | 2.70 | 1.14 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 9.11 | 2.41 | 2.72 | 8.30 | 2.70 | 1.14 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 6.18 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 7.06 | 2.36 | 0.62 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 1.99 | 1.13 | 0.65 | — | 0.66 | 0.46 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 2.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 4.93 | — | 1.10 | 0.96 | — | 200.86 | 193.33 | 41.29 | 58.66 | 22.50 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $492391 | $443684 | $442000 | $442000 | $862500 | $3M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $1M |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
As reported in recent financial filings, KIDZW trades at a P/S multiple of 0.01, a figure that suggests the market has largely abandoned expectations for future growth and is instead pricing the entity as a distressed asset with significant terminal value uncertainty.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that investors are assigning almost no value to the company's revenue stream, likely due to the persistent negative margins and the lack of a clear path to profitability. This valuation level suggests that the market views the current business model as fundamentally broken rather than merely experiencing a temporary cyclical downturn.
Based on the company's reported figures, the ROIC has consistently trended in negative territory, reaching -7.3% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm is actively destroying shareholder value with every dollar of capital deployed into its current educational service operations.
The inability to generate positive returns on invested capital highlights a structural failure to achieve the necessary scale to cover fixed costs. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward a less capital-intensive model, as the current trajectory suggests that further investment may only exacerbate the existing value destruction.
According to the latest quarterly data, the asset turnover ratio has remained suppressed at 0.04 in 2026Q1, reflecting a significant disconnect between the company's asset base and its ability to generate meaningful revenue from its platform and teacher roster.
The low asset turnover suggests that the company is carrying significant underutilized capacity, likely in the form of technology infrastructure or personnel that are not being effectively monetized. This inefficiency, combined with the erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, implies that the company lacks the operational leverage required to sustain its current size.
As indicated by the financial statements, the current ratio has deteriorated to 0.94 in 2026Q1, signaling that the company's short-term assets are no longer sufficient to cover its immediate liabilities, which warrants further investigation into the firm's ability to meet upcoming operational obligations.
The decline in the current ratio below parity is a major red flag for any service-based business, as it suggests an imminent risk of a liquidity crunch. Without a rapid improvement in cash collection or a significant reduction in operating expenses, the company may be forced to seek dilutive financing to maintain basic operations.
Based on the reported figures, the most commonly misapplied metric for KIDZW is top-line revenue growth, which obscures the underlying unit economic reality that the company is currently paying more to acquire and serve students than it receives in lifetime value.
Analysts often focus on revenue as a proxy for market share, but for this business model, the focus should instead be on the CAC/LTV ratio and contribution margin per student. Relying on revenue growth in a high-burn, negative-margin environment can lead to a dangerous overestimation of the company's long-term viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying KIDZW stock.
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI's current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI's return on equity (ROE) is -186.5%. The historical average is -60.0%.
Based on historical data, KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI has 57.0% gross margin and -106.7% operating margin.