Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -186.5%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $819496 | $44M | $2.5B | $2.4B | $2.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8M | $51M | $2.5B | $2.4B | $2.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.24 | 13.02 | 689.86 | 774.29 | 1195.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.10 | 11.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 15.01 | 690.78 | 775.17 | 1196.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 57.0% | 56.0% | 53.6% | 1.8% | — | -6.3% | 38.5% | 70.1% | 100.0% | -72.8% |
| Operating Margin | -106.7% | -106.7% | -22.7% | -13.7% | -122.1% | — | 0.2% | -343.2% | -2507.4% | -1896.5% | -1131.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -209.3% | -209.3% | -22.9% | -14.0% | -122.5% | — | 0.2% | -324.4% | -2423.7% | -1863.5% | -1131.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -186.5% | -186.5% | — | — | -1.4% | 3.7% | 0.2% | -322.6% | -975.8% | — | -992.3% |
| ROA | -81.0% | -81.0% | -36.7% | -15.3% | -1.3% | 3.5% | 0.1% | -277.6% | -390.6% | -507.2% | -501.6% |
| ROIC | -57.7% | -57.7% | — | — | -1.0% | -0.1% | 0.1% | -305.4% | -4212.6% | — | -1208.8% |
| ROCE | -61.4% | -61.4% | — | — | -1.3% | -0.1% | 0.2% | -337.5% | -519.0% | -916.1% | -641.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.77 | — | — | — | -0.00 | -0.13 | -0.10 | -0.93 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -0.15 | -0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -90.44 | -52.93 | -348.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 9.11 | 2.41 | 2.72 | 8.30 | 2.70 | 1.14 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 9.11 | 2.41 | 2.72 | 8.30 | 2.70 | 1.14 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 6.18 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 7.06 | 2.36 | 0.62 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 1.99 | 1.13 | 0.65 | — | 0.66 | 0.46 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 2.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 4.93 | — | 1.10 | 0.96 | — | 200.86 | 193.33 | 41.29 | 58.66 | 22.50 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $492391 | $443684 | $442000 | $442000 | $862500 | $3M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $1M |
Liquidity and insolvency risk
Based on current market data, KIDZ trades at a P/S multiple of 0.19, which, as reported in recent financial filings, suggests that the market is pricing the company as a distressed entity rather than a growth-oriented software platform due to its persistent negative earnings trajectory.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that investors are heavily discounting the company's future revenue potential, likely due to the ongoing contraction in the user base. This valuation level implies that the market sees little evidence of a turnaround, treating the firm as a liquidation-risk scenario rather than a viable going concern.
As indicated by the 50.3% gross margin reported in 2026Q1, KIDZ's profitability is structurally limited by the high variable costs of live instruction, which, according to financial statements, prevents the company from achieving the operating leverage necessary to offset its significant administrative and marketing overheads.
The persistent negative operating margin of -172.3% highlights that the current business model is fundamentally unable to cover its fixed costs at existing scale. This suggests that without a radical shift toward higher-margin, asynchronous content, the company will likely continue to struggle with structural unprofitability.
According to recent quarterly data, the company's asset turnover ratio has plummeted to 0.04, which, based on reported figures, reveals a severe lack of efficiency in utilizing the balance sheet to generate revenue compared to historical performance and broader industry benchmarks.
The inability to effectively deploy assets to drive top-line growth suggests that the company's current operational infrastructure is bloated relative to its actual output. Investors should monitor whether management can improve asset utilization, as the current trend indicates a significant misallocation of capital resources.
Based on the 2026Q1 current ratio of 0.94, KIDZ's liquidity position has deteriorated to a point where current assets are insufficient to cover short-term liabilities, a trend that, as noted in recent filings, warrants immediate concern regarding the company's ability to sustain operations without external financing.
The decline in the quick ratio to 0.94 confirms that the company lacks a sufficient buffer to withstand even minor operational shocks or delays in revenue collection. This precarious liquidity state suggests that the firm is highly vulnerable to insolvency if the current cash burn rate is not aggressively curtailed.
As reported in financial statements, the market's tendency to apply SaaS-like valuation multiples to KIDZ is fundamentally flawed, as the company's 50.3% gross margin profile is more characteristic of a labor-intensive service business than a scalable software platform, leading to a significant misinterpretation of its terminal value.
Analysts should prioritize cash burn and unit economics over traditional software metrics like EV/Sales, which fail to account for the high variable costs inherent in live-tutoring models. Focusing on these metrics would likely reveal a much more challenging path to profitability than the market currently anticipates.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying KIDZ stock.
KIDZ AI Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
KIDZ AI Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -186.5%. The historical average is -60.0%.
Based on historical data, KIDZ AI Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
KIDZ AI Inc. has 57.0% gross margin and -106.7% operating margin.