Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -17.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -37.4%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $53M | $357M | $201M | $488M | $439M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $53M | $357M | $197M | $499M | $402M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -17.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.12 | 5.09 | 0.81 | 1.11 | 0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.85 | 6.60 | 6.70 | — | 1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 19.11 | 32.18 | 4.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.09 | 0.79 | 1.13 | 0.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.7% | 17.7% | 18.8% | 3.7% | -1.1% | 22.0% | 31.9% | 36.5% | 42.5% | 33.2% | 56.9% |
| Operating Margin | -24.1% | -24.1% | -8.2% | -86.9% | -41.0% | 10.7% | 20.4% | 21.3% | 22.1% | 12.7% | 31.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -22.4% | -22.4% | -13.5% | -84.8% | -39.4% | 10.2% | 20.3% | 22.3% | 22.3% | 13.8% | 31.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -37.4% | -37.4% | -525.4% | -214.0% | -50.8% | 12.2% | 24.4% | 37.5% | 41.2% | 22.9% | 50.1% |
| ROA | -15.2% | -15.2% | -26.5% | -85.0% | -25.1% | 7.3% | 19.5% | 24.6% | 23.3% | 15.1% | 35.6% |
| ROIC | -31.8% | -31.8% | -152.1% | -177.6% | -43.7% | 10.3% | 21.7% | 48.9% | 82.2% | 41.5% | 220.8% |
| ROCE | -39.9% | -39.9% | -206.3% | -215.4% | -52.7% | 12.7% | 24.1% | 34.0% | 36.8% | 19.6% | 49.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.29 | — | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.02 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.06 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.01 | -0.13 | — | -0.10 | -0.09 | -0.05 | -0.30 | -0.73 | -0.51 | -0.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -0.35 | -0.17 | -0.82 | -1.52 | -2.00 | -2.07 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -0.25 | -0.20 | -1.13 | -2.73 | -4.35 | -2.18 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -36.26 | -280.86 | -98.39 | 56.88 | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($8M) exceeds total debt ($8M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.02 | 0.75 | 0.97 | 1.08 | 2.94 | 2.68 | 1.65 | 2.29 | 3.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.02 | 0.75 | 0.97 | 1.08 | 2.87 | 2.44 | 1.60 | 2.27 | 2.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 1.26 | 1.36 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 2.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.67 | 2.45 | 2.90 | 0.70 | 0.54 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.77 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 1279.96 | 186.05 | 56.31 | 11.80 | 24.17 | 103.36 | 61.63 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 180.55 | 73.23 | 16.65 | 15.44 | 83.82 | 109.84 | 84.87 | 103.23 | 139.41 | 79.39 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $12M | $766767 | $672833 | $658405 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Institutional contract revenue collapse
As reported in recent financial filings, Jianzhi's P/S ratio of 6.67 and negative P/E of -22.46 suggest that the market is struggling to price the company's equity given the severe contraction in revenue and the absence of a clear path back to profitability.
The current valuation appears to be untethered from traditional earnings-based metrics, as the company's negative net income renders standard P/E analysis irrelevant. Investors should monitor whether the premium over book value is justified by potential intellectual property or if it represents a mispricing of a business in terminal decline.
Based on the company's reported figures, the gross margin has deteriorated from a peak of 26.1% in 2021Q1 to a negative 4.8% in 2023Q4, indicating that the firm's core service offerings are currently failing to cover their direct costs of production.
This negative margin profile suggests that Jianzhi's business model is highly sensitive to scale, and the recent revenue collapse has stripped away the operating leverage necessary to maintain profitability. The shift from positive operating margins to a -24.14% loss implies that the company's fixed cost base is now disproportionately large relative to its current revenue generation capacity.
According to historical financial statements, the company's ROIC has plummeted from a positive 7.7% in 2021Q2 to -6.5% in 2023Q4, reflecting a rapid destruction of shareholder capital as the firm struggles to generate returns on its institutional IT infrastructure investments.
The decline in ROIC suggests that the capital previously deployed into university IT systems is no longer yielding the expected economic returns. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's assets have become impaired or if the competitive environment has rendered its existing technology stack obsolete.
As documented in quarterly reports, the company's asset turnover has slowed to 0.24, while DSO has reached 98 days, suggesting that Jianzhi is facing increasing difficulty in converting its institutional service contracts into timely cash inflows.
The lengthening collection cycle, combined with the low asset turnover, implies that the company's working capital management is under significant strain. This inefficiency appears to be a symptom of the broader breakdown in institutional contract stability, as the firm may be forced to offer more lenient payment terms to retain its remaining clients.
Investors frequently misapply P/S ratios to Jianzhi, which obscures the fact that a significant portion of revenue may be low-margin, pass-through hardware procurement rather than high-margin software licensing, as suggested by the company's recent negative gross margins.
Relying on revenue multiples in this context is misleading because it fails to account for the quality of the top line. A more appropriate metric would be a focus on gross profit per institutional contract, which would better reveal the actual economic value being generated by the company's proprietary content library versus its hardware-heavy service segment.
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JZ stock.
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited's current P/E ratio is -17.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -37.4%. The historical average is -8.3%.
Based on historical data, Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited is trading at a P/E of -17.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited has 17.7% gross margin and -24.1% operating margin.