Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.1x · EV/EBITDA 5.9x · ROE 24.5%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $247M | $239M | $414M | $336M | $392M | $190M | $37M | $52M | $221M | $309M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $430M | $423M | $587M | $569M | $672M | $539M | $492M | $507M | $395M | $525M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.06 | 8.58 | 10.47 | 9.29 | 9.31 | — | — | — | 7.24 | 5.59 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.32 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.31 | 0.44 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.08 | 1.97 | 3.91 | 9.02 | — | — | — | 1.35 | 1.03 | 1.72 | — |
| P/FCF | 9.78 | 9.48 | 8.15 | 7.24 | 6.61 | 2.73 | — | 3.61 | 5.16 | 8.14 | — |
| P/OCF | 5.85 | 5.67 | 6.36 | 5.30 | 5.27 | 2.53 | — | 1.59 | 3.27 | 4.05 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.71 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 1.09 | 0.92 | 1.15 | 0.73 | 0.56 | 0.75 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.94 | 5.83 | 6.00 | 5.21 | 6.34 | 6.13 | — | — | 4.03 | 5.04 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 8.39 | 8.54 | 8.42 | 7.47 | 8.40 | — | — | — | 6.45 | 7.59 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 16.78 | 11.56 | 12.26 | 11.32 | 7.75 | — | 35.15 | 9.23 | 13.82 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 68.7% | 68.7% | 70.4% | 70.8% | 68.8% | 67.4% | 57.6% | 62.0% | 65.2% | 66.5% | 67.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 8.6% | 12.5% | 14.2% | 13.0% | 10.0% | -38.5% | -16.2% | 8.7% | 9.9% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.7% | 4.7% | 6.5% | 6.0% | 6.8% | -4.8% | -32.7% | -18.6% | 4.3% | 7.9% | 3.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 24.5% | 24.5% | 55.2% | 195.7% | — | — | — | -101.9% | 15.5% | 36.6% | 16.6% |
| ROA | 6.4% | 6.4% | 9.3% | 8.1% | 9.2% | -5.9% | -24.6% | -20.4% | 5.0% | 9.5% | 4.2% |
| ROIC | 13.2% | 13.2% | 20.9% | 23.6% | 20.6% | 13.3% | -28.9% | -19.1% | 11.7% | 13.4% | 11.8% |
| ROCE | 16.8% | 16.8% | 27.1% | 28.2% | 24.6% | 18.0% | -38.8% | -21.8% | 12.1% | 14.2% | 12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.85 | 1.85 | 1.97 | 7.93 | — | — | — | 12.36 | 1.12 | 1.35 | 2.18 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.10 | 3.10 | 2.14 | 2.70 | 3.46 | 4.38 | — | — | 2.45 | 2.32 | 2.79 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.51 | 1.64 | 6.26 | — | — | — | 11.80 | 0.81 | 1.20 | 2.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.54 | 2.54 | 1.77 | 2.13 | 2.64 | 3.97 | — | — | 1.78 | 2.07 | 2.65 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.29 | 3.42 | 5.02 | 4.70 | 5.02 | — | 31.54 | 4.07 | 5.68 | 8.42 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.74 | 4.74 | 4.44 | 3.17 | 3.76 | -0.05 | -9.29 | -5.72 | 3.21 | 3.59 | 3.18 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 1.26 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.96 | 1.70 | 1.26 | 1.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.86 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.95 | 0.49 | 0.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.64 | 0.25 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.33 | 1.46 | 1.42 | 1.33 | 1.30 | 0.86 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.17 | 1.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.67 | 2.67 | 2.95 | 3.33 | 3.82 | 3.41 | 3.12 | 3.62 | 3.18 | 2.90 | 3.17 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6.02 | 3.17 | 4.09 | 4.37 | 10.07 | 30.63 | 5.65 | 4.10 | 2.47 | 3.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.9% | 2.0% | 0.7% | — | — | — | — | 96.3% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 17.4% | 17.4% | 7.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 11.0% | 11.7% | 9.6% | 10.8% | 10.7% | — | — | — | 13.8% | 17.9% | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.2% | 10.5% | 12.3% | 13.8% | 15.1% | 36.7% | — | 27.7% | 19.4% | 12.3% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.9% | 3.0% | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 99.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $15M | $15M | $14M | $14M | $12M | $9M | $9M | $9M | $9M | $9M |
Fixed cost deleveraging risk
As reported in recent financial filings, JILL trades at a forward P/E of 6.81, a multiple that suggests the market is pricing in significant long-term stagnation rather than a recovery, especially when compared to the broader specialty retail sector's historical valuation averages for similar small-cap apparel firms.
The current P/S ratio of 0.40 indicates that investors are assigning little value to the company's revenue base, likely due to the persistent top-line contraction. This valuation appears to reflect a market consensus that the brand's physical footprint is a liability rather than an asset, warranting further investigation into whether the Direct-to-Consumer segment can eventually command a higher multiple.
Based on quarterly data, ROIC has trended downward from 7.9% in 2024Q1 to 2.2% in 2026Q1, signaling that the company is struggling to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital as the core business model faces headwinds from both declining sales and rising operational costs.
The compression in ROIC suggests that the company's capital allocation, particularly regarding its store fleet, is failing to produce the necessary returns to exceed its cost of capital. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward more capital-light growth strategies to reverse this multi-quarter decay in efficiency.
According to recent financial statements, the Cash Conversion Cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 38 days in 2026Q1, which highlights the operational difficulty of balancing inventory levels against a backdrop of softening consumer demand and the inherent seasonality of the apparel retail business model.
The elevated DIO of 133 days in 2026Q1 suggests that inventory is not moving as quickly as historical norms, which may necessitate future markdowns that would further pressure margins. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a primary driver of the company's recent cash flow volatility.
As disclosed in recent SEC filings, JILL has successfully reduced its debt-to-equity ratio from 7.93 in 2023Q4 to 1.76 in 2026Q1, a significant improvement that provides the company with a more stable balance sheet despite the ongoing challenges in maintaining consistent operating income.
While the reduction in debt is a positive development for financial flexibility, the interest coverage ratio of 4.87 in 2026Q1 remains sensitive to any further contraction in operating margins. The company appears to be prioritizing debt reduction, which may limit its ability to invest in growth initiatives during this period of revenue decline.
As noted in industry analysis, the P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to JILL, as it obscures the significant impact of non-cash lease accounting adjustments and the high fixed-cost structure that disproportionately penalizes earnings during periods of even minor revenue contraction within the retail apparel sector.
Investors should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or free cash flow yields, which better capture the underlying cash-generating capability of the business by stripping away the noise of lease-related depreciation and amortization. Relying solely on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's true value as an omnichannel operator.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JILL stock.
J.Jill, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 9.1x. The historical average is 8.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
J.Jill, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.5x.
J.Jill, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 24.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 30.7%.
Based on historical data, J.Jill, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 9.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
J.Jill, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.92% with a payout ratio of 17.4%.
J.Jill, Inc. has 68.7% gross margin and 8.6% operating margin.
J.Jill, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.