Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 453.2x · EV/EBITDA 10.1x · ROE 0.4%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $27M | $38M | $42M | $17M | $76M | $123M | $413M | $339M | $605M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $5M | $-115354662 | $-56125040 | $-92851895 | $-9913389 | $182M | $283M | $311M | $244M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 453.18 | 91.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.85 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.87 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.16 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 1.29 | 4.66 | 1.01 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 2.93 | 0.60 | 11.85 | — | — | — | 7.73 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 2.92 | 0.60 | 4.94 | — | — | — | 5.45 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.32 | -0.18 | -0.32 | -0.03 | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.34 | 0.34 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.06 | -37.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | -43.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | -1.83 | -15.76 | — | — | — | 5.28 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 67.2% | 66.1% | 68.7% | 68.7% | 74.1% | 43.7% | 28.3% | 27.6% | 25.1% | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | -0.5% | -3.1% | -17.5% | -30.7% | -38.7% | -40.3% | -16.3% | -13.0% | -32.5% | -82.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.1% | 0.1% | -2.2% | -21.4% | -32.5% | -39.3% | -47.7% | -12.1% | -9.3% | -31.7% | -87.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4% | 0.4% | -6.9% | -47.4% | -57.2% | -52.4% | -114.2% | -32.6% | -35.1% | — | — |
| ROA | 0.1% | 0.1% | -1.9% | -15.9% | -20.8% | -20.3% | -48.8% | -19.4% | -9.8% | -34.4% | -37.0% |
| ROIC | — | — | -697.9% | -115.6% | -43.6% | -44.5% | -121.5% | -77.5% | -28.8% | — | — |
| ROCE | -1.7% | -1.7% | -8.8% | -35.5% | -50.5% | -50.3% | -87.4% | -31.5% | -17.3% | -50.9% | -47.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.45 | 0.36 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.01 | 5.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.54 | -0.99 | -1.06 | -0.54 | 0.28 | -0.41 | -0.40 | -0.60 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -49.67 | -49.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.43 | -27.61 | — | — | — | -2.45 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 35.83 | 35.83 | -49.45 | -78.89 | -33.73 | -14.94 | -18.19 | -8.86 | -8.38 | -771.71 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($168M) exceeds total debt ($15M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 1.02 | 1.15 | 3.37 | 4.78 | 2.51 | 3.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 1.15 | 3.37 | 4.78 | 2.33 | 2.83 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.32 | 0.95 | 2.23 | 3.40 | 1.78 | 2.50 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 6.72 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | 0.54 | 1234.59 | — | 4496.30 | 9.93 | 6.19 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 43.30 | 62.18 | 46.10 | 39.52 | 66.69 | 34.47 | 8.32 | 81.05 | 65.20 | 49.51 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.2% | 1.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 34.2% | 166.9% | 8.4% | — | — | — | 12.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.0% | 19.6% | 6.1% | 21.8% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.0% | 19.6% | 6.1% | 21.8% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $6M | $6M | $6M | $6M | $6M | $6M | $6M | $4M | $6M | $6M |
Regulatory Data Monetization Constraints
Based on reported figures, Aurora Mobile's P/S ratio of 0.49 suggests the market is heavily discounting the firm's revenue, likely reflecting skepticism regarding its ability to achieve sustained profitability, especially when compared to the higher valuation multiples typically afforded to more stable, profitable software-as-a-service peers.
The extreme P/E ratio of 439.65 is essentially noise, as the company lacks consistent GAAP earnings to support a meaningful valuation multiple. Investors appear to be pricing the stock as a distressed asset or a speculative turnaround play rather than a growth-stage technology firm, given the significant gap between current market capitalization and the company's historical peak valuations.
According to historical financial data, Aurora Mobile has consistently generated negative ROIC, with figures reaching -2.6% in 2023Q3, indicating that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its core developer services and data intelligence operations.
The persistent negative returns on capital suggest that the firm's heavy investment in R&D and server infrastructure has yet to yield a competitive advantage that translates into pricing power. Without a clear path to positive operating margins, the company's capital allocation strategy appears to be focused on survival rather than generating an economic profit above its cost of capital.
As reported in financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has shown extreme volatility, swinging from 1046 days in 2021Q4 to -47 days in 2023Q3, which suggests that management's control over receivables and payables is highly inconsistent and potentially influenced by non-operational accounting adjustments.
The erratic nature of the DSO and DPO metrics indicates that the company may be struggling to collect payments from its enterprise clients in a timely manner, or that it is aggressively managing its payables to preserve cash. This lack of stability in working capital management warrants further investigation into the underlying quality of the company's revenue streams.
Based on recent SEC filings, the current ratio has deteriorated to 0.66 as of 2023Q3, signaling that the company's short-term assets are insufficient to cover its immediate liabilities, which raises significant concerns regarding its financial flexibility in the face of potential regulatory or market-driven liquidity shocks.
The decline from a current ratio of 1.26 in 2020Q2 to current levels indicates a narrowing margin of safety that leaves the company vulnerable to any disruption in its cash collection cycle. Investors should monitor whether the company will be forced to seek external financing or dilute shareholders to maintain its current operational scale.
Market participants often misapply top-line revenue growth as a proxy for business health, failing to account for the fact that Aurora Mobile's revenue mix has shifted toward lower-margin or pass-through segments that do not contribute meaningfully to the company's bottom-line profitability or long-term sustainability.
Analysts should prioritize operating cash flow and gross margin expansion over headline revenue growth, as the latter can be easily inflated by accounting treatments in the advertising segment. Focusing on revenue growth alone obscures the fundamental reality that the company has yet to prove its ability to scale its high-margin data intelligence products profitably.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JG stock.
Aurora Mobile Limited's current P/E ratio is 453.2x. The historical average is 91.9x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Aurora Mobile Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 10.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Aurora Mobile Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 0.4%. The historical average is -43.2%.
Based on historical data, Aurora Mobile Limited is trading at a P/E of 453.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Aurora Mobile Limited has 67.2% gross margin and -0.5% operating margin.
Aurora Mobile Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.