Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2026–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | — |
| Enterprise Value | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — |
| P/S Ratio | — |
| P/B Ratio | — |
| P/FCF | — |
| P/OCF | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — |
| EV / EBIT | — |
| EV / FCF | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — |
| Operating Margin | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — |
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| ROE | — |
| ROA | — |
| ROIC | — |
| ROCE | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — |
| Debt / FCF | — |
| Interest Coverage | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Current Ratio | — |
| Quick Ratio | — |
| Cash Ratio | — |
| Asset Turnover | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — |
| Payout Ratio | — |
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — |
| FCF Yield | — |
| Buyback Yield | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — |
Benchmark lock-in erosion risk
As reported in financial statements, IWB maintains high gross margins because the cost of managing additional assets is negligible, allowing BlackRock to capture significant economies of scale while maintaining a premium fee structure relative to newer, lower-cost 'Core' series product offerings in the current market environment.
The fund's profitability is primarily a function of its AUM-based management fee, which operates with minimal incremental costs as assets grow. This suggests that the fund's earning power is highly resilient, provided that the institutional benchmark status of the Russell 1000 remains intact.
Based on the fund's structural design, IWB exhibits high asset turnover efficiency, as the portfolio is managed to track the Russell 1000 index rather than through active trading strategies, ensuring that operational friction remains low relative to the total assets under management held by the fund.
The efficiency of this vehicle is best measured by its tracking error and the cost of annual reconstitution. Investors should monitor whether the fund's turnover costs remain competitive, as excessive slippage during index rebalancing could erode the net returns provided to shareholders.
According to fund documentation, IWB maintains a liquidity profile that is inherently robust, as the underlying securities are among the most traded assets globally, ensuring that the fund can meet investor outflows without the need for external financing or cash reserves during periods of market stress.
The fund's liquidity is a direct reflection of its constituent holdings, which are large-cap US equities. This suggests that the fund is well-positioned to handle significant redemption requests without impacting the net asset value, provided the underlying market remains functional.
As noted in recent market observations, the headline expense ratio is often misapplied as the sole metric for cost, obscuring the impact of tracking difference and reconstitution slippage which can significantly alter the actual net return delivered to institutional investors over a long-term holding period.
Analysts should prioritize 'total cost of ownership' metrics over the simple expense ratio to better understand the fund's true efficiency. Relying solely on the expense ratio may lead to an incomplete assessment of the fund's value proposition compared to lower-cost, S&P 500-based alternatives.
Includes 30+ ratios · 0 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IWB stock.
Based on historical data, iShares Russell 1000 ETF is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.