Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 55.6x · EV/EBITDA 18.3x · ROE 5.7%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $31.6B | $31.8B | $36.8B | $31.6B | $21.4B | $26.1B | $17.4B | $7.7B | $4.3B | $6.2B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $35.1B | $35.3B | $40.3B | $32.8B | $22.6B | $27.4B | $19.6B | $8.8B | $5.7B | $7.9B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 55.61 | 54.63 | 43.91 | 40.71 | 35.30 | 46.17 | — | 48.26 | 15.85 | 339.30 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.13 | 4.15 | 5.09 | 4.60 | 3.62 | 5.06 | 4.39 | 3.80 | 1.59 | 2.63 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.18 | 3.13 | 3.60 | 3.21 | 2.32 | 2.87 | 1.90 | 4.10 | 2.55 | 4.23 | — |
| P/FCF | 25.88 | 26.04 | 29.52 | 24.87 | 27.99 | 47.26 | 20.15 | 25.53 | 10.90 | 43.45 | — |
| P/OCF | 23.29 | 23.43 | 26.37 | 22.97 | 24.91 | 42.34 | 19.08 | 22.32 | 9.62 | 31.14 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.61 | 5.57 | 4.77 | 3.82 | 5.32 | 4.94 | 4.35 | 2.13 | 3.32 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.25 | 18.35 | 22.60 | 20.21 | 18.09 | 27.76 | 41.59 | 25.79 | 9.19 | 27.89 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 24.76 | 24.90 | 29.92 | 27.62 | 26.75 | 45.66 | 298.87 | 44.24 | 12.75 | 281.79 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.93 | 32.28 | 25.79 | 29.53 | 49.74 | 22.68 | 29.28 | 14.60 | 54.91 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 38.5% | 43.8% | 41.9% | 39.3% | 38.6% | 35.4% | 38.6% | 37.6% | 37.8% | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 18.5% | 18.0% | 16.9% | 13.8% | 11.0% | 1.5% | 9.6% | 16.5% | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.6% | 7.6% | 11.6% | 11.3% | 10.2% | 10.9% | -0.8% | 7.9% | 10.0% | 0.8% | -1.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.7% | 5.7% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 6.6% | 6.2% | -0.6% | 9.0% | 17.1% | 2.1% | -10.8% |
| ROA | 3.2% | 3.2% | 5.0% | 5.1% | 4.0% | 3.6% | -0.3% | 3.5% | 5.9% | 0.4% | -0.8% |
| ROIC | 7.8% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 8.1% | 5.9% | 3.9% | 0.6% | 4.8% | 10.6% | 2.8% | 2.7% |
| ROCE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 6.1% | 4.0% | 0.6% | 4.9% | 11.1% | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 1.38 | 10.22 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.49 | 2.49 | 2.79 | 1.70 | 2.23 | 3.52 | 8.36 | 4.78 | 2.68 | 7.21 | 10.06 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.60 | 0.87 | 1.12 | 9.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.93 | 0.72 | 0.94 | 1.38 | 4.65 | 3.30 | 2.33 | 5.82 | 9.13 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.90 | 2.76 | 0.92 | 1.54 | 2.48 | 2.54 | 3.74 | 3.70 | 11.46 | 27.65 |
| Interest Coverage | 5.58 | 5.58 | 6.31 | 7.58 | 8.19 | 6.85 | 0.59 | 2.25 | 4.51 | 0.20 | 0.63 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.06 | 2.06 | 2.29 | 2.22 | 2.37 | 2.80 | 2.58 | 2.69 | 2.23 | 2.61 | 2.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.71 | 1.67 | 1.76 | 2.22 | 2.10 | 1.81 | 1.35 | 1.72 | 1.50 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 1.44 | 1.17 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.70 | 0.51 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.45 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.01 | 4.01 | 3.85 | 3.99 | 3.50 | 3.70 | 3.58 | 2.47 | 3.20 | 2.99 | 2.75 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.42 | 67.37 | 65.51 | 69.22 | 67.20 | 79.17 | 83.06 | 71.30 | 82.41 | 83.11 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 5.5% | 5.5% | 3.9% | 4.2% | 5.4% | 1.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.8% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 2.5% | 2.8% | 2.2% | — | 2.1% | 6.3% | 0.3% | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.9% | 3.8% | 3.4% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 5.0% | 3.9% | 9.2% | 2.3% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.2% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.8% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 0.1% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.3% | 3.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 0.1% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $401M | $407M | $409M | $410M | $421M | $383M | $209M | $209M | $184M | $190M |
Acquisition integration complexity
According to current market data, Ingersoll Rand trades at a forward P/E of 23.21, which suggests that investors are pricing in a sustained compounding narrative that differentiates the firm from traditional, lower-multiple industrial machinery peers who lack the company's recurring aftermarket service revenue tail.
The valuation premium relative to peers like Xylem or Roper Technologies appears to be predicated on the market's belief in the 'IRX' operating model's ability to drive margin expansion. Investors should monitor whether this valuation can be sustained if organic growth rates fail to accelerate beyond current levels, as the current multiple leaves little room for execution errors in the integration of recent acquisitions.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has remained in the low single digits, hovering around 1.9% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the aggressive acquisition strategy has significantly inflated the capital base with goodwill, thereby masking the underlying operational returns generated by the core business units.
While the company's operational margins are healthy, the return on invested capital is currently suppressed by the accounting impact of purchase price allocations from its 'string of pearls' M&A strategy. Analysts should look past these headline figures to assess whether the acquired assets are truly accretive to long-term shareholder value or if they are merely contributing to a bloated asset base.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 97 days in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company's inventory management and receivables collection processes are sensitive to the timing of large-scale industrial project deliveries and the integration of new, disparate supply chains.
The variability in the CCC, particularly the elevated days inventory outstanding, warrants further investigation into whether this reflects strategic stockpiling to mitigate supply chain risks or an inefficiency in managing the multi-brand architecture. A tightening of this cycle would likely serve as a meaningful catalyst for improved free cash flow conversion in future quarters.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to this business model because it fails to account for the significant non-cash amortization of intangible assets resulting from the 2020 merger, which artificially depresses reported net income and makes the company appear more expensive than its cash-generative reality suggests.
Investors should instead focus on Cash EPS or EV/EBITDA, as these metrics better capture the underlying profitability of the industrial platform by neutralizing the impact of purchase price accounting. Relying solely on P/E may lead to an incorrect assessment of the company's valuation, as it ignores the substantial recurring cash flows generated by the mission-critical aftermarket service business.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IR stock.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 55.6x. The historical average is 40.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 18.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 23.5x.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.7%. The historical average is 2.7%.
Based on historical data, Ingersoll Rand Inc. is trading at a P/E of 55.6x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.10% with a payout ratio of 5.5%.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. has 38.5% gross margin and 18.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.