Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 47.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 1.7%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $151M | $96M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $151M | $95M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 47.55 | 46.45 | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.7% | 1.7% | 12.8% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 1.1% | 11.4% |
| ROIC | -0.2% | -0.2% | -0.5% |
| ROCE | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($365751) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.97 | 3.97 | 0.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.97 | 3.97 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.75 | 3.75 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.1% | 2.2% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $9M | $58M |
Liquidation and deal failure
According to reported financial data, the P/E ratio of 47.41 appears largely disconnected from operational reality, as the entity lacks any revenue or earnings, rendering traditional valuation multiples ineffective for assessing the intrinsic value of this shell vehicle compared to its historical performance or broader market benchmarks.
The elevated P/E ratio is likely a byproduct of non-operating accounting adjustments rather than fundamental earning power. Investors should monitor the lack of forward-looking valuation metrics, which suggests that the market is currently unable to price the entity's potential for a successful business combination.
Based on the provided quarterly figures, the ROIC of -0.6% in 2026Q1 highlights a persistent trend of capital decay, as the entity continues to consume its limited resources on administrative overhead without generating any productive returns on the capital initially raised from public market investors.
The negative return on capital is a direct consequence of the entity's inability to deploy funds into a revenue-generating asset. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the sponsor's deal-sourcing strategy is capable of reversing this value destruction before the vehicle reaches its mandatory liquidation date.
As reported in recent SEC filings, the current ratio of 2.18 in 2026Q1, while appearing superficially healthy, masks a precarious cash position that has dwindled significantly, leaving the entity with limited flexibility to navigate the complex due diligence requirements necessary to secure a viable software acquisition target.
The volatility in the current ratio, which dropped from 7.52 in 2025Q2 to 2.18 in 2026Q1, suggests that the entity is rapidly exhausting its working capital. This liquidity profile indicates that the company may be forced to rely on external sponsor support to maintain its ongoing compliance and search activities.
The most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the Price-to-Earnings ratio, which obscures the fact that the entity is a non-operating shell, and analysts should instead focus on the trust account value and the remaining cash runway to assess the probability of a successful merger.
Using P/E ratios to evaluate a SPAC is fundamentally flawed because the entity lacks core operational revenue. Investors should prioritize monitoring the cash burn rate and the sponsor's track record of deal completion, as these metrics provide a more accurate reflection of the entity's survival and potential for future value creation.
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IPOD stock.
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. IV's current P/E ratio is 47.5x. The historical average is 46.5x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. IV's return on equity (ROE) is 1.7%. The historical average is 7.2%.
Based on historical data, Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. IV is trading at a P/E of 47.5x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.