Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -133.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18M | $23M | $16M | $61M | $763M | $1.3B | $259M | $1.7B | $1.1B | $320M | $109M |
| Enterprise Value | $16M | $21M | $14M | $74M | $772M | $1.3B | $245M | $1.7B | $1.1B | $322M | $112M |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 379.31 | 508.00 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.50 | 3.21 | 2.82 | 10.89 | 101.37 | 173.93 | 39.07 | 124.02 | 111.70 | 46.58 | 17.93 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.37 | 3.13 | 2.60 | — | — | 322.97 | 16.51 | 475.81 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 419.84 | 483.08 | 1268.35 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 394.40 | 445.23 | 1175.09 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.95 | 2.45 | 13.17 | 102.48 | 173.85 | 37.00 | 123.89 | 111.72 | 46.97 | 18.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 343.35 | 440.05 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 374.70 | 463.69 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 419.43 | 483.20 | 1279.08 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.8% | 75.8% | 76.8% | 77.6% | 55.5% | 50.2% | 59.1% | 60.8% | 62.6% | 58.8% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | -129.2% | -129.2% | -146.4% | -214.7% | -216.3% | -268.0% | -98.5% | 33.0% | 24.1% | -10.9% | -23.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -127.7% | -127.7% | -135.0% | -247.6% | -215.6% | -258.4% | -98.5% | 32.7% | 22.3% | -0.4% | -25.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -133.9% | -133.9% | -124.6% | — | — | -192.1% | -67.8% | 358.1% | — | — | — |
| ROA | -82.7% | -82.7% | -87.7% | -179.0% | -175.4% | -129.2% | -48.8% | 81.9% | 82.8% | -2.2% | -119.3% |
| ROIC | -144.1% | -144.1% | -172.1% | -246.9% | -329.7% | -553.4% | -254.1% | 610.2% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -111.5% | -111.5% | -107.8% | — | -1743.4% | -165.4% | -57.6% | 157.9% | 2606.3% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.44 | — | — | 0.89 | 0.19 | 0.47 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.34 | 0.74 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.26 | -0.34 | — | — | -0.15 | -0.87 | -0.47 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.34 | 0.11 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.41 | 0.12 | 10.72 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -113.14 | -113.14 | -23.75 | -6.36 | -5.88 | -894.33 | -1085.33 | 98.07 | 13.10 | -3.58 | -9.70 |
Net cash position: cash ($4M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.37 | 2.37 | 1.51 | 0.08 | 0.41 | 1.62 | 8.55 | 2.60 | 1.14 | 0.62 | 0.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.37 | 2.37 | 1.51 | 0.08 | 0.41 | 1.62 | 8.55 | 2.60 | 1.14 | 0.61 | 0.51 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.32 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 1.21 | 7.80 | 1.72 | 0.51 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.50 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 2.00 | 2.53 | 4.73 | 4.78 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 999999.00 | 188.27 | 48.51 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6.74 | 12.14 | 43.45 | 91.77 | 51.86 | 67.99 | 41.90 | 69.87 | 51.17 | 44.56 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.1% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.3% | 0.2% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M | $5M | $12M | $12M | $18M | $733900 | $15M | $15M | $13M | $13M |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
According to current market data, Intrusion Inc. trades at a P/S multiple of 1.90, a valuation that appears disconnected from the company's negative earnings and contracting revenue base, suggesting investors are pricing in a speculative turnaround rather than reflecting the firm's underlying fundamental reality.
The lack of a meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA ratio underscores the company's inability to generate positive earnings, rendering traditional valuation metrics largely inapplicable. This pricing suggests that the market is assigning value to the TraceCop data asset and potential future SaaS growth, yet this optimism appears increasingly fragile given the persistent operating losses.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -57.2% in 2026Q1, which indicates that every dollar of capital invested is currently resulting in significant value destruction rather than compounding returns for shareholders over the long term.
The persistent negative ROIC trend, which has fluctuated between -18% and -94% over the last ten quarters, highlights a structural inability to deploy capital efficiently. This decay in returns suggests that the current business model is not yet capable of generating the necessary margins to cover its cost of capital.
As reported in financial statements, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at approximately 0.10 to 0.25, reflecting a persistent inability to generate meaningful revenue from its existing asset base while struggling with highly volatile collection cycles and extended payment terms.
The erratic nature of the Days Sales Outstanding, which swung from 8 to 86 days over the observed period, suggests significant friction in the company's revenue realization process. This inefficiency, combined with a high DPO, indicates that the firm is likely relying on supplier leniency to manage its constrained liquidity position.
Based on the 2026Q1 balance sheet, the company's current ratio has deteriorated to 0.69, a sharp decline from the 3.97 peak observed in 2025Q1, signaling that current assets are increasingly insufficient to cover short-term obligations as cash reserves are rapidly depleted by ongoing operational losses.
The rapid compression of the current ratio suggests that the company is approaching a liquidity wall that may necessitate dilutive financing or emergency capital measures. Investors should monitor the cash burn rate closely, as the current trajectory leaves little room for operational errors or unexpected market headwinds.
As indicated by the company's financial disclosures, analysts frequently misapply top-line revenue growth as a proxy for success, failing to account for the low-margin hardware resale component that obscures the true, albeit struggling, performance of the core SaaS-based Shield product line.
Focusing on headline revenue growth ignores the underlying shift in business mix, which is critical for assessing the company's long-term viability. A more appropriate metric would be the growth rate of recurring SaaS subscriptions, adjusted for the volatility of legacy forensic tool sales, to better gauge the success of the strategic pivot.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying INTZ stock.
Intrusion Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Intrusion Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -133.9%. The historical average is -57.7%.
Based on historical data, Intrusion Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Intrusion Inc. has 75.8% gross margin and -129.2% operating margin.