Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -2.8%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4M | $11M | $611634 | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-61020336 | $-53979060 | $-60136974 | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.59 | 4.56 | 0.23 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -22.77 | -23.07 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | -117.57 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 63.7% | 472.4% | 77.2% | 79.7% | 90.2% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -108.2% | -108.2% | -12.4% | 20.1% | 26.6% | 59.8% | 52.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -98.3% | -98.3% | -16.3% | 19.8% | 24.3% | 51.8% | 421.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -2.8% | -2.8% | -1.3% | 26.9% | 18.4% | 18.7% | 47.5% |
| ROA | -2.6% | -2.6% | -1.1% | 14.7% | 13.1% | 15.9% | 41.3% |
| ROIC | -9.6% | -9.6% | -11.3% | 130.1% | 33.3% | 24.2% | 6.5% |
| ROCE | -3.0% | -3.0% | -0.9% | 22.9% | 17.1% | 21.0% | 5.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.02 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 5.45 | 2.71 | 0.87 | 0.30 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.64 | -0.94 | -9.65 | -0.90 | -0.36 | -0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -118.76 | -38.51 | -2.81 | -0.63 | -2.85 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -61.47 | -2.43 | -0.86 | -0.88 |
| Interest Coverage | -281.94 | -281.94 | -9.83 | 38.26 | 5.02 | 214.65 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($67M) exceeds total debt ($3M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 27.28 | 27.28 | 13.63 | 2.16 | 3.68 | 8.37 | 7.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 27.28 | 27.28 | 13.63 | 2.16 | 3.68 | 8.37 | 7.01 |
| Cash Ratio | 19.63 | 19.63 | 12.43 | 1.78 | 3.09 | 3.56 | 2.28 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.10 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 3805.25 | 77.47 | 96.53 | 535.70 | 280.46 | 2256.45 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 517.8% | — | 48.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1M | $32813 | $32813 | $32813 | $32813 | $32813 |
Capital Allocation Inefficiency
According to recent financial data, the company trades at a P/S of 1.75, yet this multiple appears largely irrelevant as the firm's valuation is primarily driven by its $67.4M cash position rather than the underlying consulting business's ability to generate sustainable earnings or revenue growth.
The negative P/E of -1.78 reflects the firm's inability to achieve profitability, rendering traditional earnings-based valuation metrics ineffective for assessing the company's intrinsic value. Investors appear to be pricing the entity as a cash-rich shell, as the market capitalization is heavily supported by liquid assets rather than the stagnant and loss-making PR operations.
Based on reported figures, the ROIC has plummeted to -72.3% in 2025Q4, signaling a profound inability to generate returns on invested capital as the firm struggles to scale its high-fixed-cost consulting model within the competitive and currently stagnant Hong Kong financial communications market.
The dramatic decay in ROIC from positive levels in early 2024 suggests that the company is failing to deploy its capital effectively, with returns being eroded by persistent operating losses. This trend indicates that management has not yet identified a path to operational efficiency, leaving the capital base to be consumed by administrative overhead.
As reported in recent filings, the company's DSO has reached 124 days, which, when compared to historical norms, suggests a significant deterioration in the firm's ability to collect receivables efficiently from its client base in the challenging Hong Kong capital market environment.
The extended collection cycle highlights a potential mismatch between service delivery and cash realization, which exacerbates the firm's existing liquidity pressures. This inefficiency in working capital management further complicates the path to breakeven, as the firm is forced to finance its operations while waiting for delayed client payments.
Based on the most recent quarterly data, the company maintains a current ratio of 27.28, which, while technically indicating a fortress-like liquidity position, appears disconnected from the firm's actual operational needs given the persistent negative net margins and the lack of meaningful revenue growth.
While the high current ratio provides a substantial safety net against insolvency, it also highlights the firm's failure to deploy capital into productive, revenue-generating activities. This liquidity profile warrants caution, as it suggests the company is currently functioning more as a repository for cash than as a growing consultancy.
Investors frequently misapply standard net margin analysis to this business model, failing to recognize that the firm's current financial profile is dominated by idle cash rather than the underlying consulting operations, which are structurally unprofitable at the current scale of $2.37M in annual revenue.
Focusing on net margins obscures the reality that the company is essentially a cash-heavy vehicle with an operating 'option' attached. Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate relative to the total cash pile to determine the true runway, rather than evaluating the firm through the lens of traditional profitability ratios.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying INTJ stock.
Intelligent Group Limited's current P/E ratio is -1.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Intelligent Group Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -2.8%. The historical average is 17.9%.
Based on historical data, Intelligent Group Limited is trading at a P/E of -1.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Intelligent Group Limited has 63.7% gross margin and -108.2% operating margin.