Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -30.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -78.8%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $323M | $3.6B | $5.4B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $313M | $3.6B | $5.4B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -30.14 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 113.44 | 1266.11 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 14.06 | 237.60 | 1941.35 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1262.56 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 2.0% | 2.0% | — | -57.0% | 32.7% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -153.3% | -153.3% | — | -498.2% | -18.0% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -248.7% | -248.7% | — | -487.1% | -22.4% | -3.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -78.8% | -78.8% | -752.7% | — | -140.2% | -27.6% |
| ROA | -70.2% | -70.2% | -95.7% | -125.7% | -41.9% | -9.1% |
| ROIC | -99.5% | -99.5% | -129.1% | -317.2% | -41.3% | -41.5% |
| ROCE | -47.4% | -47.4% | -130.0% | -83312.6% | -78.0% | -59.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | — | 1.32 | 0.67 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.66 | -0.47 | — | 1.27 | 0.42 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | -37.66 | -109.75 | -9.17 |
Net cash position: cash ($10M) exceeds total debt ($50000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 29.49 | 29.49 | 1.74 | 0.29 | 1.18 | 1.45 |
| Quick Ratio | 24.99 | 24.99 | 1.49 | 0.19 | 1.02 | 1.01 |
| Cash Ratio | 21.64 | 21.64 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | — | 0.31 | 1.23 | 2.59 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.32 | 1.32 | — | 3.18 | 9.19 | 7.26 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 162.38 | — | 32.15 | 154.61 | 65.27 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Rapid liquidity depletion risk
Based on reported figures, INHD trades at a P/S ratio of 113.44, a valuation that appears disconnected from its negative profitability and suggests investors are pricing the company on speculative growth potential rather than the underlying reality of its current, highly cyclical steel-based business model.
The extreme P/S multiple indicates that the market is assigning a significant premium to the company's mobile factory technology, despite the lack of evidence that this IP can generate sustainable margins. Investors should monitor whether this valuation can be sustained as the company continues to report net losses, as the lack of a positive P/E or EV/EBITDA makes traditional fundamental valuation metrics currently inapplicable.
As reported in financial statements, INHD's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -4.7% in 2026Q2, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its capital-intensive, project-based manufacturing operations in the steel sector.
The negative return on capital trend suggests that the company's investments in mobile factory units have yet to achieve the necessary scale to cover their own cost of capital. This persistent decay in returns warrants further investigation into whether the current business model is structurally capable of achieving positive economic profit in the future.
According to recent quarterly data, INHD's asset turnover remains extremely low at 0.02 in 2026Q2, highlighting a significant inability to generate revenue from its asset base and suggesting that the company's mobile factory fleet is currently suffering from severe under-utilization across its project portfolio.
The high DSO and DIO figures, which reached 515 and 260 days respectively in 2026Q2, reveal a sluggish cash conversion cycle that places immense pressure on the company's liquidity. This inefficiency implies that the company is struggling to manage its inventory and receivables effectively, which is a critical risk for a firm operating in the volatile steel fabrication industry.
While the current ratio of 163.81 might appear to signal a fortress balance sheet, this metric is fundamentally misapplied to INHD, as it obscures the company's inability to convert its assets into cash and ignores the rapid depletion of capital required to fund ongoing operations.
Investors should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the velocity of project completion, as the current ratio is artificially inflated by the lack of meaningful current liabilities rather than true liquidity strength. Relying on standard liquidity ratios in this context may lead to a false sense of security regarding the company's ability to survive its current negative operating margin environment.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying INHD stock.
Inno Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -30.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Inno Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -78.8%. The historical average is -82.2%.
Based on historical data, Inno Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of -30.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Inno Holdings Inc. has 2.0% gross margin and -153.3% operating margin.