Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 27.9x · EV/EBITDA 27.1x · ROE 22.1%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $503M | $592M | $135M | $78M | $67M | $76M | $34M | $17M | $20M | $17M | $12M |
| Enterprise Value | $496M | $585M | $136M | $78M | $68M | $78M | $34M | $18M | $20M | $18M | $13M |
| P/E Ratio → | 27.93 | 35.35 | 15.21 | 66.98 | — | — | — | — | 23.58 | 434.29 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 11.87 | 13.97 | 5.24 | 5.68 | 7.01 | 9.94 | 5.97 | 2.75 | 5.39 | 3.99 | 21.41 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.22 | 5.35 | 3.34 | 3.78 | 3.79 | 5.80 | 3.01 | 1.94 | 2.14 | 2.49 | 2.27 |
| P/FCF | 83.27 | 98.01 | 26.76 | — | — | — | — | 195.13 | — | 128.59 | — |
| P/OCF | 26.35 | 31.02 | 12.47 | 36.89 | — | — | — | 81.48 | — | 50.56 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 13.79 | 5.27 | 5.69 | 7.07 | 10.19 | 5.94 | 2.95 | 5.57 | 4.21 | 24.75 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.09 | 31.96 | 13.08 | 31.12 | — | — | — | — | 16.89 | 39.03 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 31.10 | 36.68 | 15.36 | 69.47 | — | — | — | — | 24.17 | 209.55 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 96.75 | 26.89 | — | — | — | — | 209.10 | — | 135.83 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 43.8% | 50.3% | 29.0% | 26.5% | 6.4% | 1.2% | 12.1% | -20.0% | 27.8% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 37.6% | 37.6% | 32.7% | 7.4% | -26.6% | -40.1% | -17.5% | -11.2% | 22.7% | 6.9% | -189.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 39.4% | 39.4% | 34.3% | 8.5% | -26.5% | -41.4% | -11.3% | -10.0% | 22.9% | 0.9% | -252.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 22.1% | 22.1% | 29.0% | 6.1% | -16.5% | -26.0% | -6.5% | -6.8% | 10.4% | 0.7% | -25.1% |
| ROA | 20.9% | 20.9% | 26.0% | 5.2% | -13.0% | -19.4% | -5.0% | -5.7% | 8.3% | 0.4% | -16.5% |
| ROIC | 16.6% | 16.6% | 20.5% | 3.9% | -11.5% | -17.6% | -7.1% | -5.2% | 7.0% | 3.0% | -10.6% |
| ROCE | 20.7% | 20.7% | 26.4% | 4.9% | -14.3% | -20.5% | -8.5% | -6.9% | 9.2% | 4.1% | -15.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.38 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | 0.73 | 2.35 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.07 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.14 | -0.01 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.41 | -0.41 | 0.06 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | 0.53 | 2.08 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.25 | 0.12 | — | — | — | — | 13.97 | — | 7.24 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 106.09 | 25.29 | -24.59 | -14.65 | -3.89 | -7.57 | 9.99 | 0.75 | -7.26 |
Net cash position: cash ($10M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 13.96 | 13.96 | 5.15 | 2.57 | 2.06 | 1.96 | 2.84 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 0.61 | 0.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 13.70 | 13.70 | 4.76 | 2.06 | 1.68 | 1.82 | 2.51 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.42 | 0.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 12.41 | 12.41 | 3.90 | 1.33 | 1.00 | 1.32 | 2.10 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | 24.70 | 24.70 | 14.24 | 11.05 | 11.39 | 33.42 | 13.93 | 23.90 | 23.80 | 12.61 | 2.42 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 33.79 | 22.41 | 27.82 | 34.74 | 19.74 | 17.30 | 18.39 | 22.80 | 26.64 | 38.33 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.6% | 2.8% | 6.6% | 1.5% | — | — | — | — | 4.2% | 0.2% | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.2% | 1.0% | 3.7% | — | — | — | — | 0.5% | — | 0.8% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $15M | $13M | $12M | $12M | $10M | $9M | $9M | $9M | $8M | $7M |
Single asset production dependency
Based on recent market data, IDR trades at a P/S multiple of 12.74, which appears to command a premium relative to larger, more diversified peers, likely reflecting the market's recognition of its superior net margin profile and lack of debt-related financial risk.
The current P/E of 29.97 suggests that investors are pricing in sustained production growth rather than mere commodity price exposure. This valuation warrants caution, however, as the forward EV/EBITDA of 70.54 implies that the market may be anticipating a significant increase in capital intensity or a potential cooling of current high-margin output levels.
As reported in historical financial filings, IDR's ROIC has fluctuated between 1.1% and 7.5% over the last ten quarters, indicating that while the company is compounding capital, its returns remain highly sensitive to the operational throughput of the Golden Chest Mine.
The recent trend toward higher ROIC suggests that management is successfully optimizing its mill-to-mine infrastructure. Investors should monitor whether these returns can be sustained as the company potentially shifts capital toward more speculative rare earth exploration, which may dilute the current high-efficiency profile.
According to quarterly data, IDR's cash conversion cycle has swung from 37 days to 5 days, highlighting the inherent volatility in inventory management and concentrate shipment timing that characterizes the company's current production-focused operational model.
The variability in the CCC suggests that the company lacks the scale to exert significant leverage over its supply chain or logistics partners. While the current liquidity position is strong, the inconsistency in working capital efficiency may lead to lumpy cash flow generation that could surprise investors during periods of lower production.
Based on the most recent quarterly figures, IDR maintains a current ratio of 12.77, an exceptionally high level that provides a substantial safety margin against the operational and regulatory shocks that typically threaten single-asset mining operations in the Pacific Northwest.
This liquidity position appears to be a deliberate strategic choice, allowing the company to fund exploration and infrastructure upgrades without resorting to dilutive financing. Such a fortress-like balance sheet effectively mitigates the risk of insolvency, though it may also suggest that capital is not being deployed as aggressively as it could be.
The most commonly misapplied metric for IDR is the P/B ratio, which obscures the company's true value by failing to account for the unique regulatory and cost advantages provided by its patented mining claims in the Murray Gold Belt.
Investors should instead focus on cash-flow-based metrics or adjusted EBITDA, as the book value of mining assets often fails to capture the strategic optionality of the company's rare earth holdings. Relying on standard mining valuation multiples may lead to an undervaluation of the firm's ability to operate with lower regulatory friction than its peers.
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IDR stock.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 27.9x. The historical average is 35.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 27.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 26.8x.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 22.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -15.3%.
Based on historical data, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 27.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. has 43.8% gross margin and 37.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.