Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 18.8x · EV/EBITDA 14.7x · ROE 12.4%. (2010–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.4B | $13.4B | $7.4B | $10.4B | $9.3B | $7.5B | $6.9B | $10.4B | $8.3B | $10.8B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $13.8B | $15.7B | $10.0B | $12.6B | $11.9B | $10.4B | $8.3B | $11.8B | $9.4B | $11.4B | $9.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 18.81 | 22.10 | 13.54 | 15.21 | 15.98 | 13.83 | 9.95 | 18.92 | 9.97 | 22.53 | 15.17 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 1.17 | 1.02 | 1.45 | 1.23 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.24 | 2.63 | 1.60 | 2.53 | 2.65 | 2.68 | 3.64 | 6.54 | 5.50 | 6.14 | 5.26 |
| P/FCF | 14.36 | 16.83 | 286.36 | 15.28 | 19.19 | 17.54 | 9.35 | 28.38 | 18.48 | 24.99 | 16.19 |
| P/OCF | 9.53 | 11.17 | 18.95 | 10.68 | 12.08 | 9.90 | 6.33 | 11.59 | 9.12 | 13.26 | 10.58 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.26 | 0.87 | 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.09 | 0.88 | 1.32 | 1.15 | 1.53 | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.70 | 16.79 | 11.64 | 11.17 | 12.93 | 12.89 | 8.15 | 12.13 | 8.35 | 10.59 | 9.04 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.65 | 17.84 | 13.58 | 13.29 | 14.54 | 14.61 | 9.14 | 15.62 | 9.11 | 13.48 | 10.78 |
| EV / FCF | — | 19.82 | 385.48 | 18.59 | 24.76 | 24.22 | 11.15 | 32.14 | 20.80 | 26.33 | 17.23 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.7% | 12.7% | 12.6% | 14.4% | 13.5% | 14.4% | 17.8% | 17.2% | 21.9% | 19.1% | 20.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 4.9% | 4.6% | 6.8% | 5.3% | 5.4% | 8.2% | 8.3% | 11.3% | 11.7% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 5.9% | 5.4% | 5.7% | 7.4% | 6.2% | 10.2% | 6.4% | 8.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.4% | 12.4% | 12.6% | 18.0% | 18.4% | 23.1% | 39.9% | 35.4% | 51.1% | 28.1% | 36.5% |
| ROA | 4.9% | 4.9% | 4.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | 5.8% | 9.2% | 8.2% | 13.1% | 7.5% | 9.3% |
| ROIC | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.9% | 9.4% | 7.2% | 8.6% | 18.5% | 20.2% | 28.2% | 28.7% | 30.8% |
| ROCE | 6.4% | 6.4% | 6.2% | 9.7% | 7.0% | 7.3% | 13.8% | 15.3% | 19.3% | 17.4% | 17.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 1.24 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.36 | 3.36 | 3.96 | 2.37 | 3.41 | 4.33 | 1.82 | 1.49 | 1.14 | 1.19 | 1.25 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.77 | 1.02 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.69 | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.53 | 2.53 | 2.99 | 1.99 | 2.91 | 3.55 | 1.31 | 1.42 | 0.93 | 0.54 | 0.55 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.99 | 99.12 | 3.31 | 5.57 | 6.68 | 1.80 | 3.76 | 2.31 | 1.34 | 1.04 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.40 | 8.40 | 7.77 | 9.98 | 8.05 | 7.99 | 7.92 | 10.76 | 17.74 | 8.98 | 11.59 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.15 | 1.10 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.58 | 1.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.01 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 1.08 | 1.04 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 1.45 | 1.44 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.50 | 0.54 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.98 | 0.95 | 1.02 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 1.15 | 1.27 | 1.28 | 1.17 | 1.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | 49.77 | 49.77 | 48.49 | 52.73 | 50.47 | 50.66 | 56.14 | 54.18 | 49.88 | 32.89 | 26.70 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 69.61 | 66.42 | 69.50 | 69.95 | 74.81 | 63.05 | 59.68 | 56.03 | 58.27 | 60.11 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.9% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 35.2% | 35.2% | 37.5% | 29.4% | 33.2% | 34.2% | 24.7% | 27.1% | 15.8% | 24.0% | 17.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.3% | 4.5% | 7.4% | 6.6% | 6.3% | 7.2% | 10.1% | 5.3% | 10.0% | 4.4% | 6.6% |
| FCF Yield | 7.0% | 5.9% | 0.3% | 6.5% | 5.2% | 5.7% | 10.7% | 3.5% | 5.4% | 4.0% | 6.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.2% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 2.5% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.9% | 1.6% | 4.9% | 2.7% | 2.6% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 4.0% | 10.5% | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $39M | $39M | $40M | $40M | $40M | $41M | $41M | $44M | $46M | $47M |
Operational Execution and Labor
According to current market data, HII trades at a forward P/E of 16.27, which appears to discount the company as a heavy industrial manufacturer rather than a high-tech defense prime, despite its growing portfolio of unmanned systems and intelligence-driven services within the Mission Technologies segment.
The current valuation multiple suggests that investors remain skeptical of the company's ability to expand margins beyond the constraints of its government-contracted shipbuilding business. This pricing warrants further investigation into whether the market is systematically undervaluing the long-term terminal value associated with the AUKUS nuclear submarine partnership.
Based on reported figures, HII's ROIC has struggled to maintain momentum, hovering between 0.9% and 3.7% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company is currently failing to compound returns on invested capital at a rate that exceeds its cost of capital.
The low ROIC trend appears to be a direct consequence of the capital-intensive nature of the Newport News and Ingalls shipyards, where massive infrastructure requirements weigh heavily on the denominator. Investors should monitor whether the shift toward higher-margin service contracts can eventually lift these returns above the current depressed levels.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has shown significant volatility, peaking at 67 days in 2024Q3, which highlights the inherent difficulty in managing working capital across multi-year, milestone-based defense contracts that are sensitive to labor-driven schedule delays.
The fluctuation in DSO and CCC suggests that HII's operational efficiency is highly susceptible to the timing of government payments and internal project management performance. This variability may indicate that the company lacks the leverage to optimize its supplier and customer payment terms effectively in the current environment.
Compared to industry peers like General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman, HII's net margin profile remains structurally lower, with recent data showing a range of 3.7% to 5.8%, suggesting that the company's heavy reliance on hull construction limits its profitability relative to more diversified defense primes.
The persistent gap in profitability metrics compared to the broader aerospace and defense group appears to be a structural feature of HII's specific focus on nuclear-powered vessel construction. This divergence warrants caution, as it suggests that HII may continue to trade at a discount unless it can successfully scale its higher-margin Mission Technologies segment.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to HII's business model, as it fails to account for the significant distortions caused by percentage-of-completion accounting and the impact of FAS/CAS pension income on reported earnings, which can mask the true underlying industrial cash generation of the firm.
Analysts should instead prioritize free cash flow before pension contributions to better assess the company's actual earning power. Relying on P/E multiples likely obscures the volatility inherent in cumulative catch-up adjustments, leading to an inaccurate assessment of the company's operational health and long-term value creation potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HII stock.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 18.8x. The historical average is 15.8x. This places it at the 79th percentile of its historical range.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.6x.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.4%. The historical average is 23.2%.
Based on historical data, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 18.8x. This is at the 79th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.87% with a payout ratio of 35.2%.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has 12.7% gross margin and 4.9% operating margin.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.