Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.2x · EV/EBITDA 28.9x · ROE 12.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $659M | $627M | $558M | $426M | $608M | $924M | $472M | $459M | $432M | $451M | $423M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.1B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $646M | $713M | $744M | $676M | $577M |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.21 | 11.47 | 19.78 | 16.16 | 16.19 | 13.70 | 9.29 | 11.79 | 14.23 | 17.53 | 18.07 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.78 | 2.65 | 2.57 | 2.24 | 5.14 | 7.49 | 4.09 | 3.96 | 4.68 | 5.47 | 5.76 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.39 | 1.31 | 1.29 | 1.05 | 1.57 | 2.61 | 1.61 | 1.86 | 2.03 | 2.43 | 2.63 |
| P/FCF | 18.56 | 17.64 | 47.44 | 23.10 | 11.40 | 16.10 | 10.70 | 14.11 | 12.45 | 16.61 | 16.91 |
| P/OCF | 18.42 | 17.51 | 46.88 | 21.58 | 10.88 | 15.66 | 10.34 | 13.83 | 12.06 | 16.45 | 16.85 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.80 | 7.83 | 9.22 | 12.86 | 10.68 | 5.60 | 6.15 | 8.05 | 8.20 | 7.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.86 | 28.41 | 45.69 | 48.97 | 27.76 | 14.14 | 9.11 | 13.15 | 17.15 | 15.10 | 14.24 |
| EV / EBIT | 29.08 | 28.63 | 46.63 | 49.86 | 28.01 | 14.22 | 9.21 | 13.31 | 17.41 | 15.32 | 14.50 |
| EV / FCF | — | 58.66 | 144.87 | 95.18 | 28.53 | 22.96 | 14.65 | 21.91 | 21.41 | 24.87 | 23.03 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 43.6% | 30.1% | 33.3% | 68.4% | 91.0% | 79.7% | 64.1% | 67.9% | 77.2% | 80.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.7% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 18.5% | 45.9% | 75.1% | 60.8% | 46.2% | 46.2% | 53.5% | 54.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.0% | 23.0% | 13.0% | 13.8% | 31.7% | 54.6% | 44.0% | 33.6% | 32.9% | 31.2% | 31.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.0% | 12.0% | 6.7% | 6.6% | 10.1% | 20.8% | 18.8% | 16.9% | 15.2% | 14.8% | 15.7% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| ROIC | 2.8% | 2.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 3.0% | 8.1% | 7.2% | 5.1% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 5.1% |
| ROCE | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 4.0% | 10.6% | 9.4% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 6.2% | 6.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.05 | 3.05 | 3.47 | 4.15 | 3.31 | 1.88 | 1.39 | 2.05 | 2.86 | 3.12 | 2.96 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 19.96 | 19.96 | 40.17 | 47.19 | 23.28 | 7.13 | 5.76 | 9.33 | 14.00 | 12.95 | 11.76 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.04 | 2.65 | 3.26 | 2.37 | 1.11 | 0.59 | 1.03 | 1.46 | 1.21 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 19.87 | 19.87 | 30.73 | 37.08 | 16.68 | 4.23 | 2.46 | 4.68 | 7.18 | 5.02 | 3.78 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 41.02 | 97.43 | 72.08 | 17.14 | 6.86 | 3.95 | 7.80 | 8.96 | 8.27 | 6.12 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 1.65 | 11.55 | 3.31 | 1.34 | 1.51 | 2.56 | 2.97 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 10.1% | 10.1% | 19.4% | 25.7% | 17.5% | 8.6% | 9.7% | 11.2% | 12.1% | 13.4% | 13.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.2% | 8.7% | 5.1% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 7.3% | 10.8% | 8.5% | 7.0% | 5.7% | 5.5% |
| FCF Yield | 5.4% | 5.7% | 2.1% | 4.3% | 8.8% | 6.2% | 9.3% | 7.1% | 8.0% | 6.0% | 5.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
CRE concentration and funding
According to current market data, Hingham trades at a P/B of 1.42, a multiple that appears to price the institution as a premium franchise despite the significant earnings volatility observed in recent quarters as reported in the latest financial filings.
The elevated P/B ratio suggests that investors continue to assign a premium to Hingham's historical capital stewardship and lean operating model. However, this valuation may be difficult to justify if the current ROTCE remains depressed, as the market appears to be looking past the immediate margin compression toward a potential long-term recovery.
Based on the provided quarterly data, Hingham's ROE has fluctuated significantly, reaching a low of 0.6% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the bank's profitability is currently strained by a combination of compressed net interest margins and volatile non-interest income contributions.
The DuPont analysis highlights that the bank's reliance on spread-capture is currently failing to generate sufficient returns due to the rapid repricing of liabilities. Without a recovery in NIM, the bank's ability to maintain its historical ROE levels appears increasingly dependent on non-core equity portfolio performance, which introduces unwanted earnings noise.
As reported in financial statements, Hingham maintained an efficiency ratio of 18.4% in 2026Q1, confirming its status as an industry outlier, yet this operational discipline is currently being offset by a NIM that has compressed to 0.5% due to rising funding costs.
While the bank's skeletal branch network provides a structural cost advantage that few peers can replicate, the current interest rate environment has effectively neutralized this benefit. Investors should monitor whether the bank can maintain this efficiency level if it is forced to increase personnel or technology spending to manage credit risks in its D.C. portfolio.
According to recent regulatory filings, Hingham's equity-to-assets ratio has remained near 0.11, a level that appears to be a relatively thin capital cushion given the bank's high concentration in commercial and multi-family real estate loans.
This capital position suggests limited room for error should the CRE market experience a significant downturn. The bank's reliance on this thin buffer implies that any unexpected credit losses could necessitate a rapid deleveraging or a reduction in capital returns to shareholders to maintain regulatory compliance.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for Hingham, as it fails to account for the extreme volatility in GAAP earnings caused by the bank's equity securities portfolio, which often masks the underlying health of the core lending business.
Investors should instead focus on P/TBV and core operating income, as the P/E ratio is heavily distorted by mark-to-market swings in non-operating assets. Relying on P/E may lead to a fundamental misunderstanding of the bank's earnings power, as it treats non-recurring investment gains or losses as sustainable operational performance.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HIFS stock.
Hingham Institution for Savings's current P/E ratio is 12.2x. The historical average is 12.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Hingham Institution for Savings's current EV/EBITDA is 28.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.6x.
Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity (ROE) is 12.0%. The historical average is 13.7%.
Based on historical data, Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a P/E of 12.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hingham Institution for Savings's current dividend yield is 0.82% with a payout ratio of 10.1%.
Hingham Institution for Savings has 43.6% gross margin and 30.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Hingham Institution for Savings's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 20.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.