Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.8x · EV/EBITDA 9.0x · ROE 10.0%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $958M | $812M | $711M | $588M | $752M | $722M | $343M | $615M | $631M | $979M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.0B | $880M | $799M | $741M | $879M | $465M | $220M | $702M | $649M | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.82 | 10.77 | 11.52 | 7.40 | 7.45 | 7.35 | 8.22 | 18.87 | 11.01 | 17.96 | 19.94 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.15 | 1.83 | 1.66 | 1.48 | 2.44 | 2.81 | 1.29 | 2.25 | 2.44 | 4.03 | 5.29 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.21 | 1.02 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 1.18 | 1.12 | 0.60 | 1.09 | 1.14 | 1.74 | 2.11 |
| P/FCF | 4.70 | 3.99 | 13.85 | 5.58 | 5.17 | 7.93 | 6.15 | 10.75 | 8.66 | 12.11 | 19.08 |
| P/OCF | 4.65 | 3.94 | 13.18 | 5.46 | 5.11 | 7.70 | 5.70 | 10.46 | 8.24 | 11.99 | 18.85 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.98 | 1.86 | 1.86 | 2.85 | 1.81 | 0.83 | 2.57 | 2.51 | 4.50 | 6.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.03 | 7.74 | 8.41 | 6.11 | 5.74 | 3.07 | 3.13 | 12.34 | 6.82 | 10.10 | 12.55 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.50 | 8.15 | 9.02 | 6.47 | 6.25 | 3.43 | 3.71 | 14.82 | 7.73 | 11.46 | 14.60 |
| EV / FCF | — | 4.32 | 15.57 | 7.03 | 6.05 | 5.11 | 3.95 | 12.27 | 8.90 | 13.52 | 22.27 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 57.5% | 53.3% | 61.7% | 88.0% | 101.1% | 66.7% | 63.0% | 77.8% | 86.3% | 93.4% |
| Operating Margin | 24.3% | 24.3% | 20.6% | 28.8% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 22.4% | 17.3% | 32.4% | 39.3% | 42.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.1% | 17.1% | 14.5% | 20.1% | 32.9% | 38.4% | 15.9% | 12.0% | 22.4% | 22.5% | 26.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0% | 10.0% | 8.7% | 12.0% | 15.8% | 16.2% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 10.4% | 10.0% | 11.0% |
| ROA | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| ROIC | 7.4% | 7.4% | 5.8% | 7.6% | 10.0% | 11.0% | 5.5% | 4.7% | 8.1% | 8.4% | 8.7% |
| ROCE | 10.9% | 10.9% | 8.9% | 12.6% | 16.0% | 15.1% | 7.4% | 6.6% | 12.4% | 15.5% | 14.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.48 | 0.63 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.47 | 2.47 | 4.14 | 3.75 | 3.13 | 2.33 | 3.82 | 3.66 | 1.82 | 2.47 | 3.21 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.20 | -0.40 | -0.21 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.93 | 1.26 | 0.83 | -1.69 | -1.74 | 1.52 | 0.18 | 1.05 | 1.80 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.33 | 1.72 | 1.45 | 0.87 | -2.82 | -2.20 | 1.52 | 0.24 | 1.40 | 3.19 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 0.77 | 3.89 | 6.27 | 1.38 | 0.67 | 1.57 | 2.93 | 4.89 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.4% | 4.0% | 4.3% | 5.2% | 3.8% | 2.3% | 4.6% | 4.8% | 4.9% | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 42.9% | 42.9% | 48.8% | 38.1% | 28.2% | 16.7% | 37.8% | 90.8% | 53.4% | 47.2% | 45.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.8% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 13.5% | 13.4% | 13.6% | 12.2% | 5.3% | 9.1% | 5.6% | 5.0% |
| FCF Yield | 21.3% | 25.1% | 7.2% | 17.9% | 19.3% | 12.6% | 16.3% | 9.3% | 11.6% | 8.3% | 5.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.0% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 1.2% | 5.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.4% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 5.9% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 5.3% | 6.0% | 10.6% | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $30M | $30M | $30M | $30M | $30M | $30M | $31M | $32M | $32M | $32M |
CRE concentration and funding
According to current market data, HAFC trades at a P/B ratio of 1.23, which suggests that investors are pricing the bank at a premium to its tangible book value despite the broader sector's volatility and the bank's specific exposure to commercial real estate lending cycles.
The current P/B multiple appears to reflect a market expectation for moderate ROTCE, though it remains lower than high-performing peers like PFBC. This valuation suggests that the market views HAFC as a stable, relationship-driven franchise rather than a high-growth entity, warranting further investigation into whether the current discount to peers is justified by its CRE concentration.
Based on reported financial figures, HAFC's ROE has remained constrained within a 2.0% to 2.9% range over the last ten quarters, indicating that the bank's profitability is currently limited by a narrow net interest margin and a reliance on volatile non-interest income streams.
The decomposition of ROE suggests that the bank's profitability is heavily dependent on asset utilization, as leverage remains conservative at an equity-to-assets ratio of 0.10. Investors should monitor whether the recent pivot toward C&I lending can improve the quality of earnings and reduce the bank's historical reliance on lumpy SBA fee income.
As reported in recent financial statements, HAFC has maintained an efficiency ratio fluctuating between 31.7% and 40.4%, which suggests that while the bank exercises disciplined cost control, its net interest margin remains stagnant at 0.8% due to persistent funding cost pressures in a competitive environment.
The stability of the efficiency ratio indicates that management is successfully managing operating expenses, yet this operational efficiency is currently insufficient to offset the compression in net interest margins. The bank's inability to expand its NIM suggests that funding costs are likely tracking closely with asset yields, limiting the potential for operating leverage.
Based on the provided quarterly data, HAFC has maintained a consistent equity-to-assets ratio of approximately 0.10, which indicates a robust capital position that provides a significant buffer against potential credit losses within its concentrated commercial real estate and small business loan portfolios.
This conservative capital structure appears to be a strategic choice, allowing the bank to navigate economic cycles without the need for external capital raises. While this approach limits the potential for aggressive balance sheet expansion, it provides a stable foundation for consistent dividend payments and long-term shareholder value preservation.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to HAFC, as it fails to account for the significant non-cash fluctuations in provisions for credit losses and the lumpy nature of SBA gain-on-sale income, which can distort quarterly earnings and lead to misleading conclusions about the bank's core profitability.
Investors should prioritize P/TBV and ROE over P/E, as these metrics better reflect the bank's underlying capital efficiency and franchise value. Relying on P/E ignores the impact of CECL-related provisioning volatility, which can artificially depress earnings in periods of economic uncertainty, thereby obscuring the true earnings power of the institution.
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HAFC stock.
Hanmi Financial Corporation's current P/E ratio is 12.8x. The historical average is 12.7x. This places it at the 48th percentile of its historical range.
Hanmi Financial Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 9.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.5x.
Hanmi Financial Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.0%. The historical average is 5.4%.
Based on historical data, Hanmi Financial Corporation is trading at a P/E of 12.8x. This is at the 48th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hanmi Financial Corporation's current dividend yield is 3.38% with a payout ratio of 42.9%.
Hanmi Financial Corporation has 57.5% gross margin and 24.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Hanmi Financial Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.