Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.0x · EV/EBITDA 8.7x · ROE 11.8%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $53M | $83M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $38M | $69M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.03 | 21.07 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.45 | 0.71 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.44 | 2.52 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 24.35 | 38.34 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 23.94 | 37.69 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.58 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.73 | 15.67 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.30 | 20.29 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 31.58 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 52.7% | 52.7% | 51.3% | 57.6% | 52.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 2.9% | 5.7% | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.4% | 3.4% | 5.7% | 2.3% | 1.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.8% | 11.8% | 27.7% | 15.5% | 8.8% |
| ROA | 8.0% | 8.0% | 15.4% | 7.3% | 4.3% |
| ROIC | 14.8% | 14.8% | 48.4% | 21.0% | 18.9% |
| ROCE | 10.0% | 10.0% | 27.8% | 12.7% | 13.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.44 | -0.53 | -0.61 | -0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.35 | -3.35 | -1.96 | -3.78 | -2.75 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -6.76 | -6.60 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($15M) exceeds total debt ($521581)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.82 | 2.82 | 2.46 | 1.56 | 1.73 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.82 | 2.82 | 2.46 | 1.56 | 1.73 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.11 | 0.53 | 0.50 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.50 | 2.83 | 3.02 | 2.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 32.23 | 32.44 | 39.51 | 54.61 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.3% | 4.7% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 2.6% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $52M | $50M | $50M | $50M |
High user acquisition dependency
Based on current market data, GMHS trades at a P/S multiple of 0.49, which, when viewed alongside the reported -18.72% revenue contraction, suggests that investors are pricing the firm as a declining asset rather than a growth-oriented technology entity within the competitive mobile gaming sector.
The P/E ratio of 13.13 appears deceptively attractive, yet it likely masks the lack of sustainable earnings growth and the high volatility of the underlying publishing business. Investors should monitor whether this valuation floor holds as the company struggles to replace aging titles with new, high-performing content.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching 6.1% in 2025Q4 but showing negative trends in prior periods, which indicates that GMHS is failing to consistently compound capital due to the high costs of maintaining its third-party publishing pipeline.
The inability to maintain a stable, positive ROIC suggests that the firm's reinvestment strategy is not generating sufficient returns to justify its cost of capital. This volatility warrants further investigation into whether management's capital allocation is hampered by the diminishing returns of its current user acquisition model.
According to historical data, the company's DSO has reached 139 days, a significant increase that suggests GMHS is facing mounting difficulties in collecting payments from its distribution partners, thereby straining the firm's ability to recycle cash efficiently back into its core user acquisition activities.
The extended collection cycle relative to industry norms implies that the company lacks leverage over its distribution channels, potentially forcing it to rely on its cash reserves to bridge operational gaps. This inefficiency appears to be a structural drag on the company's ability to scale its publishing operations.
Based on the 2025Q4 balance sheet, the company maintains a current ratio of 2.82, which provides a superficial sense of security despite the underlying volatility in cash flows and the persistent pressure on operating margins observed in recent quarterly reporting periods across the firm's portfolio.
While the liquidity position appears robust on paper, the lack of consistent free cash flow generation suggests that this buffer is not being replenished by core operations. Investors should monitor whether this cash is being preserved for survival rather than strategic growth, given the current revenue contraction.
As indicated by the company's reliance on ad-arbitrage, the P/E ratio is a fundamentally flawed metric for GMHS, as it fails to account for the high-variable-cost nature of user acquisition that renders traditional earnings-based valuation models largely irrelevant for this specific mobile publishing business model.
Analysts should instead focus on the LTV/CAC ratio or adjusted EBITDA, which better reflect the true economic take-rate of the firm's publishing activities. Relying on P/E ignores the reality that the company's earnings are highly sensitive to external ad-spend fluctuations and are not indicative of long-term profitability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GMHS stock.
Gamehaus Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 12.0x. The historical average is 21.1x.
Gamehaus Holdings Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.7x.
Gamehaus Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 11.8%. The historical average is 15.9%.
Based on historical data, Gamehaus Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of 12.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Gamehaus Holdings Inc. has 52.7% gross margin and 2.9% operating margin.
Gamehaus Holdings Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.