Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 24.5x · EV/EBITDA 13.2x · ROE 20.2%. (2020–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 24.53 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.11 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.37 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 9999.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 9999.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.18 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 16.33 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 14.8% | 16.5% | 25.5% | 39.3% | 50.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 5.8% | 7.0% | 17.3% | 32.1% | 33.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.2% | 5.2% | 6.0% | 14.9% | 27.2% | 30.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 20.2% | 20.2% | 26.1% | 146.7% | 279.4% | 111.9% |
| ROA | 9.7% | 9.7% | 13.8% | 57.4% | 60.3% | 25.8% |
| ROIC | 37.4% | 37.4% | 49.6% | 329.0% | 389.2% | 94.1% |
| ROCE | 22.2% | 22.2% | 30.2% | 164.7% | 329.5% | 121.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.03 | 0.11 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.10 | 0.09 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.59 | -0.51 | -0.57 | -0.78 | -0.03 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.38 | -2.38 | -1.52 | -0.51 | -0.21 | -0.02 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -4644.36 | -9.15 | -0.90 | -0.12 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 274.92 | 274.92 | 90.99 | 6106.69 | 96752.53 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($8M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.43 | 1.43 | 1.60 | 1.50 | 1.25 | 1.30 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.43 | 1.43 | 1.60 | 1.50 | 1.25 | 1.30 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.20 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.53 | 2.08 | 3.17 | 2.29 | 0.84 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 126.44 | 71.20 | 14.81 | 128.09 | 427.89 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | 18.4% | 107.6% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M |
Negative cash flow conversion
According to recent financial filings, GLE's ROIC has plummeted from 14.1% in 2024Q3 to -1.3% by 2025Q2, signaling a rapid decay in the company's ability to generate returns on its invested capital as operational losses mount and asset intensity increases following recent acquisition activity.
The sharp reversal in ROIC suggests that the capital deployed into the business is currently failing to generate economic value, likely exacerbated by the integration of new assets that have yet to contribute to earnings. Investors should monitor whether this trend reflects a structural decline in the profitability of the core ICT service model or merely a temporary drag from recent inorganic expansion.
As reported in quarterly statements, GLE's asset turnover has declined to 0.13 in 2025Q2, while DSO remains exceptionally high at 495 days, indicating significant friction in converting project-based service delivery into actual cash inflows within the competitive Hong Kong technology services landscape.
The extremely high DSO suggests that the company may be facing substantial collection delays or is forced to offer extended payment terms to maintain its client base. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a primary driver of the company's current cash burn, as the gap between revenue recognition and cash receipt continues to widen.
Based on the latest balance sheet data, GLE reports a current ratio of 10.01, yet this figure appears misleadingly high as it fails to account for the company's negative operating cash flow and the persistent difficulty in liquidating contract assets into usable cash for ongoing operations.
While the nominal liquidity position appears robust, the lack of cash generation suggests that the current assets are heavily weighted toward non-liquid contract receivables rather than cash equivalents. This warrants further investigation into the quality of these assets, as their inability to fund operations under stress could leave the company vulnerable despite the high headline ratio.
Investors frequently misapply the current ratio to GLE, as the metric obscures the company's underlying inability to convert long-dated contract assets into cash, which is a critical flaw for a firm operating with negative free cash flow and high working capital requirements.
The current ratio provides a false sense of security by including potentially illiquid contract assets in the numerator, which may not be readily available to cover short-term liabilities. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the cash-to-current-liabilities ratio, which strips away the noise of uncollected receivables and provides a clearer view of the company's immediate solvency.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GLE stock.
Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares's current P/E ratio is 24.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares's current EV/EBITDA is 13.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is 20.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 116.8%.
Based on historical data, Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares is trading at a P/E of 24.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares has 14.8% gross margin and 5.8% operating margin.