Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 7.7x · EV/EBITDA 6.6x · ROE 12.1%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $445M | $496M | $524M | $360M | $292M | $376M | $230M | $285M | $257M | $242M | $189M |
| Enterprise Value | $811M | $861M | $846M | $659M | $629M | $612M | $449M | $392M | $476M | $423M | $325M |
| P/E Ratio → | 7.73 | 8.58 | 5.54 | 8.42 | 14.64 | 4.46 | — | 14.34 | 13.77 | 14.07 | 16.59 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.07 | 3.42 | 4.36 | 5.46 | 8.83 | 3.85 | 28.38 | 8.83 | 8.95 | 9.92 | 9.07 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.93 | 1.03 | 1.09 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 1.18 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 1.09 | 1.10 | 0.94 |
| P/FCF | 10.20 | 11.36 | 161.68 | — | — | — | — | 30.84 | — | — | 3.14 |
| P/OCF | 10.20 | 11.36 | 161.68 | — | — | — | — | 30.84 | — | — | 3.14 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.95 | 7.04 | 10.02 | 19.05 | 6.27 | 55.42 | 12.14 | 16.53 | 17.34 | 15.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.63 | 7.04 | 8.93 | 15.45 | 31.59 | 7.26 | — | 19.75 | 25.50 | 24.65 | 28.60 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.08 | 10.71 | 8.93 | 15.45 | 31.59 | 7.26 | — | 19.75 | 25.50 | 24.65 | 28.60 |
| EV / FCF | — | 19.74 | 261.19 | — | — | — | — | 42.41 | — | — | 5.42 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | 87.3% | 81.9% | 68.3% | 60.7% | 88.2% | -23.3% | 75.1% | 79.6% | 87.4% | 86.1% |
| Operating Margin | 55.5% | 55.5% | 78.8% | 64.8% | 60.3% | 86.4% | -23.1% | 61.5% | 64.8% | 70.4% | 54.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 40.1% | 40.1% | 78.8% | 64.8% | 60.3% | 86.4% | -23.1% | 61.5% | 64.8% | 70.4% | 54.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.1% | 12.1% | 21.3% | 11.8% | 6.3% | 30.5% | -0.8% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 5.8% |
| ROA | 6.8% | 6.8% | 12.4% | 6.2% | 3.2% | 16.4% | -0.4% | 4.8% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 3.2% |
| ROIC | 7.2% | 7.2% | 9.4% | 4.7% | 2.5% | 12.5% | -0.3% | 3.6% | 3.2% | 3.4% | 2.2% |
| ROCE | 9.4% | 9.4% | 12.8% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 20.0% | -0.5% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 6.4% | 4.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.49 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.71 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.25 | 3.25 | 3.43 | 7.05 | 17.04 | 2.81 | — | 6.18 | 11.80 | 10.84 | 12.55 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 1.07 | 0.74 | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.68 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.99 | 2.99 | 3.40 | 7.02 | 16.94 | 2.80 | — | 5.39 | 11.69 | 10.55 | 12.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.38 | 99.52 | — | — | — | — | 11.57 | — | — | 2.27 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.02 | 4.02 | 4.36 | 2.05 | 1.54 | 7.32 | -0.19 | 2.47 | 3.18 | 5.59 | 3.92 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.90 | 9.90 | 2.63 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.15 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.90 | 9.90 | 2.63 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 7.48 | 7.48 | 0.52 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 12.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 95.5% | 95.5% | 45.5% | 83.0% | 137.2% | 30.8% | — | 123.7% | 122.3% | 124.8% | 171.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 12.9% | 11.7% | 18.0% | 11.9% | 6.8% | 22.4% | — | 7.0% | 7.3% | 7.1% | 6.0% |
| FCF Yield | 9.8% | 8.8% | 0.6% | — | — | — | — | 3.2% | — | — | 31.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 12.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $23M | $22M | $19M | $17M | $17M | $16M | $15M | $14M | $13M | $12M |
NAV Volatility and Leverage
According to current market data, GLAD trades at a P/B of 0.89 and a P/E of 7.44, suggesting that investors are pricing in significant credit risk despite the 12.9% dividend yield, as the market remains cautious about the long-term stability of the firm's underlying asset valuations.
The valuation multiples appear to reflect a discount to book value, which is common for BDCs with external management structures that the market views as less efficient than internal peers. Investors should monitor whether the forward P/E of 9.53 indicates an expectation of earnings compression as the firm navigates a potentially more challenging credit environment for its lower middle market borrowers.
Based on reported figures, GLAD's ROIC has fluctuated between 0.5% and 3.1% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the firm struggles to consistently compound capital, likely due to the lumpy nature of equity kickers and the inherent volatility of its Level 3 asset portfolio.
The low and erratic ROIC suggests that the firm's core lending activities may not be generating sufficient excess returns to justify the risks taken in the lower middle market. This performance warrants further investigation into whether the management team is effectively allocating capital or if the portfolio is suffering from periodic impairments that erode shareholder value.
As reported in financial statements, GLAD's asset turnover remains extremely low at approximately 0.03, reflecting the passive nature of its debt-heavy investment portfolio and the limited velocity at which the firm recycles capital into new, income-generating opportunities within its target market segment.
The lack of meaningful asset turnover suggests that the firm's growth is heavily dependent on external capital raises rather than internal cash generation. Investors should monitor the DSO trends, which have swung between 20 and 51 days, as these fluctuations may indicate variability in the timing of interest collections from smaller, less liquid borrowers.
According to recent SEC filings, GLAD's debt-to-equity ratio has oscillated between 0.37 and 0.86, demonstrating an opportunistic approach to leverage that appears to prioritize short-term flexibility over the maintenance of a stable, predictable capital structure for its long-term debt service obligations.
While the current low leverage may provide a buffer, the volatility in interest coverage ratios, which have ranged from 1.00 to 5.87, suggests that the firm's ability to service debt is highly sensitive to the performance of its underlying portfolio. This inconsistency may indicate that the firm is not fully utilizing its balance sheet to optimize returns during favorable cycles.
Based on the provided data, the 12.9% dividend yield is the most commonly misapplied metric for GLAD, as it obscures the underlying volatility of net investment income and the potential for NAV erosion that often accompanies high-yield BDC distributions in the lower middle market.
Investors often mistake the high yield for a measure of safety, failing to account for the fact that distributions are frequently supported by non-cash income or capital recycling rather than consistent, high-quality cash flow. A more appropriate metric for assessing the firm's health would be the 'Net Investment Income' coverage ratio, adjusted for PIK income and non-recurring fair value gains.
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GLAD stock.
Gladstone Capital Corporation's current P/E ratio is 7.7x. The historical average is 24.3x. This places it at the 15th percentile of its historical range.
Gladstone Capital Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 6.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 27.2x.
Gladstone Capital Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 12.1%. The historical average is 7.1%.
Based on historical data, Gladstone Capital Corporation is trading at a P/E of 7.7x. This is at the 15th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Gladstone Capital Corporation's current dividend yield is 12.43% with a payout ratio of 95.5%.
Gladstone Capital Corporation has 87.3% gross margin and 55.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Gladstone Capital Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.