Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 48.8x · EV/EBITDA 15.2x · ROE 3.6%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.9B | $7.2B | $4.4B | $1.7B | $3.8B | $8.6B | $14.7B | $7.1B | $2.9B | $2.2B | $322M |
| Enterprise Value | $10.8B | $40.4B | $41.0B | $42.0B | $39.9B | $36.4B | $23.0B | $18.3B | $13.5B | $7.0B | $2.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 48.79 | 8.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.61 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 1.10 | 2.56 | 1.73 | 1.02 | 1.37 | 0.30 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.53 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.11 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 12.28 | 2.19 | 2.25 | 0.81 | 1.32 | 7.13 | 45.73 | 24.23 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.63 | 3.97 | 4.21 | 4.27 | 4.65 | 4.02 | 4.43 | 4.83 | 4.32 | 2.65 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.21 | 8.37 | 9.09 | 35.88 | 10.37 | 11.28 | 9.88 | 11.26 | 14.83 | 15.18 | 15.14 |
| EV / EBIT | 50.14 | 27.60 | 35.55 | — | 44.38 | 63.89 | 34.24 | 38.05 | 80.13 | 84.97 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.5% | 20.5% | 21.5% | 19.3% | 20.8% | 22.8% | 27.0% | 25.3% | 22.3% | 25.3% | 25.2% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 13.2% | 11.2% | -24.7% | 5.9% | 7.3% | 11.7% | 11.6% | 6.0% | 5.1% | -4.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.3% | 8.3% | 33.2% | -43.1% | -13.6% | -15.2% | -11.7% | -10.7% | -15.4% | -20.2% | -26.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.6% | 3.6% | 15.6% | -19.4% | -5.2% | -4.7% | -3.7% | -5.6% | -8.6% | -8.8% | -11.0% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 4.6% | -5.7% | -1.7% | -1.8% | -1.5% | -1.7% | -2.5% | -3.1% | -4.1% |
| ROIC | 1.8% | 1.8% | 1.4% | -3.1% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.0% | 0.8% | -0.7% |
| ROCE | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.8% | -3.8% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.9% | -0.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.71 | 1.71 | 1.88 | 2.38 | 1.85 | 1.54 | 0.96 | 1.65 | 2.32 | 1.49 | 1.44 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.85 | 9.85 | 9.87 | 41.04 | 11.63 | 11.71 | 10.56 | 10.45 | 14.06 | 14.45 | 23.19 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.20 | 1.55 | 2.00 | 1.49 | 1.13 | 0.33 | 1.08 | 1.93 | 1.07 | 0.83 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.88 | 6.88 | 8.12 | 34.45 | 9.39 | 8.62 | 3.59 | 6.87 | 11.68 | 10.38 | 13.40 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.60 | -1.11 | 0.48 | 0.34 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.26 | 0.20 | -0.07 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.60 | 2.60 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 1.13 | 1.07 | 2.40 | 1.77 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 1.49 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.60 | 2.60 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 1.13 | 1.07 | 2.36 | 1.74 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 1.41 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.10 | 2.10 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 2.13 | 1.45 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 1.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.70 | 26.73 | 33.42 | 11.66 | 6.24 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 99.48 | 115.36 | 93.33 | 94.17 | 80.89 | 94.15 | 77.91 | 70.18 | 82.35 | 68.73 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 1.2% | 3.2% | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.4% | — | — | 23.8% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.0% | 12.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 3.2% | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 23.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $206M | $184M | $184M | $183M | $182M | $157M | $138M | $124M | $98M | $37M |
High leverage and regulatory
According to recent market data, GDS trades at a forward P/E of 5.79, which stands in stark contrast to the 46.84 TTM P/E, suggesting that investors are pricing in significant earnings recovery expectations that may be disconnected from the company's historical inability to sustain GAAP profitability.
The wide divergence between trailing and forward multiples implies that the market is betting on a rapid inflection in earnings power, likely driven by the maturation of new data center capacity. However, given the company's history of erratic net income, this valuation appears to rely heavily on optimistic assumptions regarding future utilization rates rather than proven operational consistency.
As reported in financial statements, GDS's ROIC has struggled to break above 1.1% in recent quarters, indicating that the company is failing to generate returns on invested capital that exceed its likely cost of capital, a trend that warrants further investigation into its asset deployment strategy.
The persistently low ROIC suggests that the massive capital expenditures required to build out hyperscale campuses are not yet yielding the expected economic value. This inefficiency appears structural, as the company continues to prioritize aggressive capacity expansion over the optimization of existing assets, which may be diluting overall shareholder returns.
Based on reported figures, GDS's DSO has fluctuated between 84 and 124 days over the last ten quarters, which suggests that the company faces significant challenges in converting its long-term service contracts into timely cash inflows compared to more efficient global data center operators.
The extended collection cycle may reflect the bargaining power of large hyperscale customers who dictate payment terms, effectively forcing GDS to act as a financier for their infrastructure needs. This reliance on extended credit terms appears to be a structural drag on liquidity, complicating the company's ability to self-fund its ongoing operational requirements.
As indicated by the latest quarterly data, GDS's debt-to-EBITDA ratio remains high at 27.16, which suggests that the company's ability to service its substantial debt load is precarious and highly sensitive to any volatility in operating cash flow or interest rate fluctuations.
While the debt-to-equity ratio has shown some improvement, the absolute level of leverage relative to EBITDA remains a significant risk factor. Investors should monitor whether the company can successfully refinance its upcoming debt maturities without further diluting equity or incurring prohibitive interest expenses that would further constrain its financial flexibility.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for GDS is Adjusted EBITDA, which frequently obscures the company's true cash-burning nature by excluding significant share-based compensation and the heavy pre-opening expenses associated with its aggressive, capital-intensive international and domestic expansion strategy.
Relying on Adjusted EBITDA as a proxy for operational health is misleading because it ignores the reality that GDS must continuously reinvest massive amounts of capital to maintain its competitive position. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be Free Cash Flow after maintenance CapEx, which better captures the company's actual ability to generate sustainable, distributable cash.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GDS stock.
GDS Holdings Limited's current P/E ratio is 48.8x. The historical average is 8.2x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
GDS Holdings Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 15.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.1x.
GDS Holdings Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 3.6%. The historical average is -4.9%.
Based on historical data, GDS Holdings Limited is trading at a P/E of 48.8x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
GDS Holdings Limited has 20.5% gross margin and 13.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
GDS Holdings Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.