Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.4x · EV/EBITDA -4.3x · ROE -11.2%. (2008–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $752M | $706M | $570M | $520M | $852M | $2.0B | $3.0B | $1.2B | $4.3B | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $-604644686 | $-650406810 | $-963280720 | $-95358000 | $82M | $694M | $1.5B | $243M | $3.3B | $2.4B | $564M |
| P/E Ratio → | -7.41 | — | — | 76.15 | 13.29 | 42.64 | 132.86 | 12.39 | 36.48 | 37.43 | 29.44 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.59 | 1.40 | 2.39 | 1.12 | 4.07 | 3.56 | 1.65 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.09 | 1.87 | 2.97 | 1.34 | 4.76 | 4.19 | 1.75 |
| P/FCF | 11.38 | 10.69 | 80.26 | 24.09 | 4.41 | 18.26 | 19.95 | 11.08 | 22.80 | 18.41 | 16.79 |
| P/OCF | 5.42 | 5.09 | 7.00 | 5.33 | 3.07 | 11.98 | 14.32 | 6.52 | 17.26 | 14.68 | 10.45 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.31 | -0.56 | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 1.22 | 0.22 | 3.09 | 2.63 | 0.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | -4.30 | -4.62 | -11.60 | -0.90 | 0.47 | 4.59 | 13.16 | 1.19 | 16.34 | 13.61 | 4.49 |
| EV / EBIT | -10.95 | -11.78 | — | -4.85 | 0.87 | 10.46 | 52.15 | 2.01 | 26.29 | 22.87 | 9.17 |
| EV / FCF | — | -9.85 | -135.75 | -4.42 | 0.42 | 6.33 | 10.18 | 2.18 | 17.35 | 13.59 | 7.92 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 24.5% | 33.6% | 41.3% | 49.9% | 54.4% | 57.9% | 64.0% | 61.7% | 59.9% | 62.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 2.7% | -0.1% | 1.5% | 6.5% | 4.6% | 2.4% | 11.1% | 12.2% | 12.1% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -4.8% | -4.8% | -1.5% | 0.4% | 4.4% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 9.0% | 11.1% | 9.5% | 5.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -11.2% | -11.2% | -3.1% | 0.8% | 6.9% | 4.6% | 2.4% | 10.9% | 14.2% | 11.9% | 6.2% |
| ROA | -1.7% | -1.7% | -0.5% | 0.1% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 4.2% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 2.4% |
| ROIC | 4.4% | 4.4% | -0.1% | 1.9% | 7.4% | 4.7% | 2.2% | 9.4% | 10.8% | 10.1% | 6.1% |
| ROCE | 5.9% | 5.9% | -0.2% | 2.7% | 9.9% | 6.3% | 2.9% | 12.5% | 14.4% | 13.3% | 8.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.15 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 0.80 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.52 | -1.75 | -0.72 | -0.99 | -1.22 | -1.45 | -1.07 | -1.14 | -1.10 | -0.92 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -9.64 | -9.64 | -18.46 | -5.82 | -4.40 | -8.64 | -12.63 | -4.85 | -5.14 | -4.83 | -5.02 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -20.54 | -216.01 | -28.51 | -3.98 | -11.93 | -9.77 | -8.91 | -5.45 | -4.82 | -8.87 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.97 | 8.97 | -1.30 | — | 369.10 | 442.16 | 38.52 | — | 24.85 | 17.72 | 6.75 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.4B) exceeds total debt ($65M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 0.76 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 1.3% | 7.5% | 2.3% | 0.8% | 8.1% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 3.4% |
| FCF Yield | 8.8% | 9.4% | 1.2% | 4.2% | 22.7% | 5.5% | 5.0% | 9.0% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 6.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $55M | $54M | $53M | $54M | $55M | $54M | $53M | $54M | $53M | $51M |
Regulatory and margin compression
Based on reported figures, Green Dot trades at a P/S multiple of 0.36, which suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's future earnings potential compared to broader financial services peers, likely due to the persistent volatility in its bottom-line performance and ongoing platform migration costs.
The negative TTM P/E ratio of -7.46 highlights the current lack of consistent profitability, making traditional earnings-based valuation metrics less useful for investors. The forward P/E of 8.06 implies that the market is pricing in a recovery, yet this valuation appears contingent on management successfully navigating the transition to a more efficient operating model without further margin erosion.
As reported in financial statements, Green Dot's ROIC has been highly inconsistent, fluctuating from a positive 5.4% in 2026Q1 to a negative 2.5% in 2025Q3, which indicates that the company is currently struggling to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital during this intensive technological transition phase.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the capital being deployed into platform modernization is not yet yielding the expected operational efficiencies. Investors should monitor whether the recent improvement in ROIC to 5.4% represents a sustainable trend or merely a seasonal anomaly driven by the tax processing cycle.
According to recent SEC filings, Green Dot's DSO has shown significant volatility, ranging from 7 to 21 days over the last ten quarters, reflecting the heavy influence of seasonal tax-related transaction volumes on the company's ability to convert its service delivery into realized cash inflows.
The lack of a stable cash conversion cycle suggests that the company's working capital requirements are highly sensitive to the timing of its B2B and tax segment activities. This variability complicates the assessment of operational efficiency, as the reported turnover metrics are often distorted by the high-volume, low-margin nature of its BaaS partnerships.
Based on reported figures, Green Dot maintains a modest debt-to-equity ratio of 0.07 as of 2026Q1, which indicates that the company has successfully avoided excessive reliance on external debt financing despite the significant capital demands of its ongoing multi-year technology platform migration and infrastructure modernization efforts.
The company's ability to maintain such low leverage while navigating periods of negative net income suggests a strong balance sheet foundation. This conservative approach provides the necessary flexibility to absorb potential regulatory shocks or further operational losses without the immediate need for dilutive capital raises.
Data from recent filings suggests that investors frequently misapply top-line revenue growth as a proxy for business health, failing to account for the fact that much of this expansion is driven by low-margin B2B partnerships that do not necessarily translate into sustainable net income for shareholders.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for this business model is the Price-to-Sales (P/S) multiple, which obscures the underlying margin compression caused by the shift toward lower-margin BaaS volumes. Analysts should instead focus on the spread between interchange revenue and retail partner commissions to better assess the true earning power of the company's integrated bank-and-tech stack.
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GDOT stock.
Green Dot Corporation's current P/E ratio is -7.4x. The historical average is 39.6x.
Green Dot Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is -4.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.5x.
Green Dot Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -11.2%. The historical average is 35.0%.
Based on historical data, Green Dot Corporation is trading at a P/E of -7.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Green Dot Corporation has 24.5% gross margin and 2.7% operating margin.
Green Dot Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.