Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.3x · EV/EBITDA 11.0x · ROE 192.9%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.9B | $16.9B | $28.7B | $16.1B | $12.1B | $14.5B | $14.0B | $12.3B | $11.9B | $8.9B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $14.7B | $19.7B | $31.5B | $19.6B | $15.3B | $17.3B | $16.5B | $13.9B | $13.4B | $10.8B | $3.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.34 | 19.92 | 30.60 | 11.69 | 34.32 | 59.76 | — | 90.56 | 152.60 | 65.30 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.41 | 3.41 | 6.27 | 3.78 | 2.95 | 3.81 | 4.22 | 4.13 | 4.47 | 3.99 | 1.51 |
| P/B Ratio | 56.54 | 78.55 | 41.43 | 258.49 | — | 174.52 | — | 15.78 | 14.43 | 16.29 | 3.91 |
| P/FCF | 7.56 | 10.72 | 22.74 | 16.57 | 13.14 | 25.20 | 20.48 | 19.56 | 25.71 | 26.15 | 8.62 |
| P/OCF | 7.45 | 10.56 | 22.27 | 15.35 | 12.33 | 17.51 | 18.29 | 17.06 | 21.26 | 18.72 | 7.22 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.97 | 6.88 | 4.60 | 3.74 | 4.54 | 4.99 | 4.65 | 5.03 | 4.83 | 1.77 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.99 | 14.72 | 30.60 | 27.21 | 22.05 | 29.79 | 34.84 | 33.73 | 34.87 | 39.50 | 15.56 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.97 | 18.09 | 34.08 | 33.55 | 30.40 | 45.64 | — | 63.65 | 78.06 | 56.75 | 91.62 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.49 | 24.96 | 20.16 | 16.62 | 30.07 | 24.22 | 22.04 | 28.91 | 31.64 | 10.10 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 61.6% | 61.6% | 63.9% | 63.0% | 63.7% | 64.0% | 65.1% | 65.6% | 66.4% | 65.3% | 64.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 22.9% | 19.5% | 12.9% | 12.2% | 10.0% | 8.2% | 6.8% | 5.6% | 3.0% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.7% | 17.7% | 20.5% | 32.3% | 8.6% | 6.4% | -14.9% | 4.6% | 2.9% | 6.1% | -0.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 192.9% | 192.9% | 248.4% | 2210.3% | — | 678.7% | -128.5% | 17.1% | 11.2% | 21.6% | -2.4% |
| ROA | 10.8% | 10.8% | 11.9% | 18.9% | 4.9% | 3.5% | -7.8% | 2.2% | 1.3% | 2.9% | -0.5% |
| ROIC | 26.2% | 26.2% | 19.0% | 12.8% | 13.0% | 10.5% | 8.3% | 6.5% | 4.8% | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| ROCE | 21.4% | 21.4% | 17.2% | 11.7% | 10.5% | 8.4% | 6.5% | 4.8% | 3.7% | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 17.96 | 17.96 | 5.63 | 63.27 | — | 48.82 | — | 3.36 | 2.92 | 4.49 | 1.47 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.89 | 2.89 | 3.79 | 5.48 | 5.74 | 6.98 | 7.00 | 6.37 | 6.28 | 8.99 | 4.98 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 12.93 | 4.05 | 55.90 | — | 33.73 | — | 2.00 | 1.79 | 3.42 | 0.67 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 2.08 | 2.73 | 4.84 | 4.62 | 4.82 | 5.39 | 3.80 | 3.85 | 6.85 | 2.29 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.77 | 2.22 | 3.58 | 3.49 | 4.87 | 3.74 | 2.48 | 3.19 | 5.49 | 1.48 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.19 | 7.19 | 5.84 | 3.26 | 3.44 | 3.01 | -4.43 | 2.37 | 1.74 | 2.29 | 0.62 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.74 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.74 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.45 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.49 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6.13 | 7.27 | 6.57 | 5.36 | 6.08 | 4.60 | 3.69 | 3.62 | 3.01 | 1.58 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.0% | 5.0% | 3.3% | 8.6% | 2.9% | 1.7% | — | 1.1% | 0.7% | 1.5% | — |
| FCF Yield | 13.2% | 9.3% | 4.4% | 6.0% | 7.6% | 4.0% | 4.9% | 5.1% | 3.9% | 3.8% | 11.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 13.4% | 9.5% | 2.4% | 7.9% | 10.7% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 3.2% | 0.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 13.4% | 9.5% | 2.4% | 7.9% | 10.7% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 3.2% | 1.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $136M | $145M | $151M | $161M | $171M | $169M | $182M | $181M | $177M | $80M |
High debt leverage exposure
Based on current market data, GDDY trades at a forward P/E of 11.89, which appears to reflect a conglomerate discount that undervalues the company's transition from a legacy domain registrar to a higher-margin commerce platform when compared to pure-play SaaS peers like HubSpot or Wix.
The current valuation multiples suggest the market is pricing the company as a mature infrastructure provider rather than a high-growth fintech entity. Investors should monitor whether the valuation gap narrows as the market gains confidence in the company's ability to scale its proprietary payment gateway and integrated business applications.
According to historical financial data, ROIC has remained in the low single digits, fluctuating between 3.7% and 7.9% over the last ten quarters, which suggests that aggressive share repurchases have effectively prevented the company from compounding its invested capital base in a meaningful, long-term manner.
The persistent focus on returning capital to shareholders appears to have come at the expense of building a more robust equity base. This strategy warrants further investigation, as it may limit the company's ability to fund future organic growth initiatives or navigate potential sector-specific downturns without relying on external debt.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company maintains a consistent DSO of approximately 6 to 8 days, indicating that the subscription-based revenue model effectively minimizes credit risk and ensures rapid cash collection from its diverse SMB customer base across the core platform.
The low DSO relative to industry norms suggests that the company's automated billing infrastructure is highly efficient at capturing revenue upfront. This operational efficiency is a critical component of the company's ability to maintain robust free cash flow margins despite the inherent cost pressures of domain reselling.
Based on reported figures, the company's debt-to-EBITDA ratio has shown significant volatility, reaching as high as 18.41 in 2024Q1, which indicates that the current capital structure is highly sensitive to interest rate fluctuations and requires careful monitoring of ongoing debt service obligations.
While the company has demonstrated an ability to manage its interest coverage, the high leverage profile leaves little room for operational error. Investors should consider whether the current debt levels are sustainable if the company's growth in higher-margin applications fails to offset potential declines in core domain volume.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to this business model because it fails to account for the significant impact of deferred revenue and non-cash amortization charges, which often obscure the company's true underlying cash-generative power as a subscription-based infrastructure provider.
Analysts should prioritize Unlevered Free Cash Flow (uFCF) over GAAP Net Income to better assess the company's earning power. Relying solely on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's valuation, as it ignores the recurring nature of the domain-to-hosting funnel and the associated cash flow timing.
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GDDY stock.
GoDaddy Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 14.3x. The historical average is 58.1x. This places it at the 13th percentile of its historical range.
GoDaddy Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 27.6x.
GoDaddy Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 192.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 24.9%.
Based on historical data, GoDaddy Inc. is trading at a P/E of 14.3x. This is at the 13th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
GoDaddy Inc. has 61.6% gross margin and 22.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
GoDaddy Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.9x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.