Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -23.3%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $163M | $75M | $142M | $124M | $251M | $218M | $173M | $211M | $204M | $215M | $182M |
| Enterprise Value | $-496907704 | $-584472080 | $-220093640 | $113M | $352M | $6M | $-9225750 | $231M | $112M | $231M | $207M |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.37 | — | 14.02 | 17.94 | 9.46 | 8.42 | 8.50 | 14.77 | 14.42 | 18.28 | 12.94 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.83 | 0.38 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 1.72 | 1.81 | 1.41 | 2.14 | 2.48 | 2.88 | 2.72 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.61 | 0.33 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 1.07 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.27 | 1.39 | 1.49 | 1.46 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 4.63 | 18.37 | 7.34 | 8.98 | 9.92 | 12.31 | 8.85 | 39.41 | 10.06 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 4.21 | 5.72 | 6.82 | 8.24 | 7.28 | 7.26 | 7.60 | 17.53 | 8.20 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -2.98 | -0.90 | 0.59 | 2.41 | 0.05 | -0.07 | 2.34 | 1.35 | 3.09 | 3.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | -10.77 | 7.12 | 8.69 | 0.16 | -0.31 | 11.04 | 5.32 | 10.69 | 8.85 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | -13.75 | 9.54 | 9.67 | 0.18 | -0.36 | 12.92 | 6.31 | 12.06 | 9.76 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | -7.17 | 16.78 | 10.28 | 0.26 | -0.53 | 13.49 | 4.83 | 42.29 | 11.46 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -6.2% | -6.2% | 37.4% | 46.8% | 72.4% | 79.9% | 66.8% | 64.7% | 72.4% | 75.6% | 79.3% |
| Operating Margin | -35.0% | -35.0% | 6.5% | 6.2% | 25.0% | 28.5% | 20.7% | 18.1% | 21.4% | 25.6% | 31.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -28.6% | -28.6% | 5.1% | 4.8% | 19.8% | 22.6% | 16.5% | 14.4% | 17.2% | 15.7% | 21.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -23.3% | -23.3% | 4.9% | 3.8% | 12.6% | 13.6% | 11.8% | 9.1% | 9.8% | 8.8% | 11.6% |
| ROA | -1.4% | -1.4% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | -11.8% | -11.8% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 7.9% | 9.1% | 7.0% | 6.2% | 7.0% | 7.9% | 9.7% |
| ROCE | -3.0% | -3.0% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 13.3% | 13.4% | 10.6% | 8.5% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 1.10 | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.23 | 0.37 | 0.35 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 9.88 | 17.30 | 4.53 | 1.27 | 3.98 | 4.14 | 1.65 | 2.45 | 1.84 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -2.92 | -1.42 | -0.04 | 0.43 | -0.95 | -1.02 | 0.12 | -0.63 | 0.11 | 0.20 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -17.72 | -0.67 | 2.48 | -5.41 | -6.22 | 0.97 | -4.43 | 0.73 | 1.08 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -11.80 | -1.59 | 2.94 | -8.72 | -10.45 | 1.18 | -4.02 | 2.88 | 1.40 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.54 | -0.54 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 1.55 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 0.83 | 1.33 | 2.10 |
Net cash position: cash ($846M) exceeds total debt ($186M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 120.47 | 120.47 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 120.47 | 120.47 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 118.79 | 118.79 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 41.2% | 79.9% | 23.7% | 23.4% | 30.7% | 40.7% | 39.7% | 44.3% | 34.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 7.1% | 5.6% | 10.6% | 11.9% | 11.8% | 6.8% | 6.9% | 5.5% | 7.7% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 21.6% | 5.4% | 13.6% | 11.1% | 10.1% | 8.1% | 11.3% | 2.5% | 9.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $14M | $13M | $11M | $11M | $11M | $11M | $11M | $11M | $10M | $10M |
Asset quality and margin compression
As reported in recent financial statements, FGBI trades at a P/B of 0.66, a significant discount to regional peers, which suggests that the market is pricing in a terminal lack of profitability rather than a temporary cyclical downturn in the bank's core Gulf South operations.
The current valuation implies that investors have little confidence in the bank's ability to achieve a return on tangible equity that exceeds its cost of capital. This deep discount appears to be a rational response to the persistent negative earnings profile and the lack of a clear path toward margin expansion.
Based on the provided quarterly data, FGBI's ROE has been severely pressured, bottoming out at -18.6% in 2025Q3, which highlights a fundamental breakdown in the bank's ability to generate positive returns from its current asset base and multi-state branch network footprint.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the bank's profitability is being eroded by a combination of razor-thin net interest margins and high operating costs. The inability to leverage the balance sheet effectively suggests that the current business model is failing to translate scale into sustainable shareholder value.
According to recent regulatory filings, FGBI's net interest margin has stagnated between 0.5% and 0.6% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the bank is struggling to manage funding costs effectively in a high-rate environment while maintaining its complex, multi-state operational structure.
The efficiency ratio, which spiked to 54.2% in 2025Q3, underscores the difficulty of managing a fixed-cost base that does not scale with the bank's declining revenue. This suggests that the bank may need to rationalize its branch footprint to align operating expenses with its current, diminished earning capacity.
As evidenced by the equity-to-assets ratio hovering between 6% and 7% over the last ten quarters, FGBI's capital base appears increasingly vulnerable to further asset quality deterioration, leaving little room for error in the bank's current, high-risk commercial real estate and C&I loan portfolios.
While the bank maintains a significant cash position, the thin equity cushion suggests that any further credit losses could rapidly erode tangible common equity. Investors should monitor whether management prioritizes capital preservation over the current dividend, which appears increasingly unsustainable given the bank's recent net losses.
The P/E ratio is a fundamentally misapplied metric for FGBI, as the bank's recent net losses and volatile provisioning render earnings-based multiples meaningless, potentially obscuring the deeper, structural issues within the bank's balance sheet and its inability to generate consistent, recurring interest income.
Analysts should instead focus on the Price-to-Tangible-Book-Value (P/TBV) ratio, which provides a more reliable assessment of the bank's liquidation value and capital strength. Relying on P/E in this context risks misinterpreting the bank's current financial distress as a temporary earnings dip rather than a more permanent impairment.
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FGBI stock.
First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.4x. The historical average is 11.4x.
First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -23.3%. The historical average is 8.3%.
Based on historical data, First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.41%.
First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. has -6.2% gross margin and -35.0% operating margin.