Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.9x · EV/EBITDA 10.3x · ROE 12.4%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.2B | $6.2B | $8.7B | $9.7B | $7.5B | $12.7B | $10.3B | $7.9B | $4.8B | $9.1B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $8.4B | $8.5B | $11.1B | $12.2B | $9.6B | $15.1B | $12.6B | $9.8B | $6.8B | $10.3B | $8.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.88 | 20.80 | 18.46 | 24.02 | 10.92 | 16.49 | 18.59 | 18.25 | 12.21 | 19.18 | 17.51 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.38 | 1.39 | 1.89 | 2.10 | 1.59 | 2.65 | 2.84 | 1.37 | 0.87 | 1.72 | 1.45 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.62 | 2.61 | 3.59 | 4.24 | 3.60 | 4.16 | 3.70 | 3.25 | 2.18 | 3.50 | 3.05 |
| P/FCF | 16.78 | 16.97 | 18.34 | 12.16 | 23.42 | 26.86 | 15.21 | 15.61 | 10.47 | 20.93 | 14.27 |
| P/OCF | 12.86 | 13.01 | 13.03 | 9.21 | 13.24 | 18.51 | 12.44 | 12.38 | 7.87 | 15.18 | 11.08 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.91 | 2.42 | 2.63 | 2.04 | 3.15 | 3.47 | 1.70 | 1.24 | 1.95 | 1.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.34 | 10.43 | 11.97 | 15.53 | 9.96 | 15.13 | 17.18 | 11.54 | 9.16 | 12.67 | 11.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.57 | 16.35 | 15.35 | 19.18 | 12.24 | 18.67 | 21.55 | 14.68 | 11.16 | 15.05 | 13.29 |
| EV / FCF | — | 23.19 | 23.49 | 15.23 | 30.06 | 31.90 | 18.61 | 19.44 | 15.04 | 23.66 | 16.61 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.6% | 44.6% | 44.8% | 41.3% | 40.9% | 40.8% | 40.4% | 35.6% | 35.7% | 36.4% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 13.9% | 16.0% | 13.3% | 16.4% | 16.9% | 15.7% | 12.1% | 10.9% | 12.9% | 12.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.7% | 6.7% | 10.2% | 8.7% | 14.5% | 16.1% | 15.3% | 7.5% | 7.1% | 8.9% | 8.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.4% | 12.4% | 20.0% | 18.5% | 26.7% | 26.5% | 21.3% | 18.7% | 16.3% | 19.0% | 17.2% |
| ROA | 4.6% | 4.6% | 7.2% | 6.4% | 9.8% | 10.1% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 6.8% | 8.9% | 8.3% |
| ROIC | 9.8% | 9.8% | 11.5% | 10.3% | 12.0% | 11.6% | 9.0% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 14.0% | 13.4% |
| ROCE | 11.9% | 11.9% | 14.3% | 12.4% | 14.7% | 13.5% | 10.4% | 14.9% | 13.1% | 15.4% | 14.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.17 | 1.23 | 1.33 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.07 | 0.58 | 0.61 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.03 | 3.59 | 2.87 | 2.82 | 3.71 | 2.73 | 3.13 | 1.85 | 1.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.95 | 1.01 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.46 | 0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.80 | 2.80 | 2.63 | 3.12 | 2.20 | 2.39 | 3.14 | 2.27 | 2.78 | 1.46 | 1.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.22 | 5.15 | 3.06 | 6.64 | 5.04 | 3.40 | 3.83 | 4.56 | 2.72 | 2.34 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.52 | 4.52 | 5.45 | 5.45 | 6.60 | 9.62 | 6.96 | 7.11 | 8.21 | 13.85 | 12.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.25 | 1.70 | 1.59 | 1.39 | 1.64 | 1.35 | 1.13 | 1.77 | 1.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 1.13 | 1.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.41 | 2.41 | 2.65 | 2.76 | 2.73 | 2.38 | 2.49 | 5.17 | 5.19 | 5.78 | 6.00 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.96 | 40.74 | 42.15 | 40.33 | 44.12 | 74.07 | 39.56 | 38.04 | 38.36 | 40.32 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 2.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 40.4% | 40.4% | 25.3% | 28.9% | 21.2% | 18.5% | 24.1% | 28.5% | 29.6% | 23.3% | 23.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.8% | 4.8% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 9.2% | 6.1% | 5.4% | 5.5% | 8.2% | 5.2% | 5.7% |
| FCF Yield | 6.0% | 5.9% | 5.5% | 8.2% | 4.3% | 3.7% | 6.6% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 7.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.0% | 4.0% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 7.7% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 14.6% | 2.4% | 5.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.0% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 9.7% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 17.0% | 3.6% | 7.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $121M | $126M | $128M | $131M | $140M | $140M | $141M | $146M | $156M | $158M |
Cyclical demand and leverage
Based on current market data, FBIN trades at a forward P/E of 14.62, which appears to discount the company's historical premium status as investors weigh the impact of persistent revenue contraction against the potential for a recovery in the broader residential housing renovation and repair market cycle.
The current EV/EBITDA multiple of 9.52 suggests that the market is pricing FBIN as a mature, cyclical industrial rather than a high-growth innovation play. This valuation gap relative to pure-play peers like Trex indicates that investors remain skeptical of the company's ability to successfully pivot its product mix toward higher-margin, tech-enabled plumbing and security solutions.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's ROIC has compressed to 1.1% in 2026Q1, a sharp decline from historical levels that suggests the firm is currently struggling to generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of capital in the current high-rate environment.
The deterioration in ROIC is primarily driven by the significant contraction in operating margins, which have fallen to 6.9% as of the most recent quarter. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the recent capital allocation toward connected home acquisitions is creating long-term value or merely diluting the returns of the core, high-moat plumbing business.
According to quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has expanded to 129 days in 2026Q1, reflecting a significant increase in inventory days on hand that suggests the company is facing challenges in aligning its production output with the current, more tepid pace of consumer demand.
The rise in DIO to 159 days indicates that the company may be carrying excess inventory, which ties up liquidity and increases the risk of future write-downs. Investors should monitor whether this inefficiency is a temporary byproduct of the post-spin-off transition or a structural issue in managing the supply chain for the Outdoor & Security segment.
Based on reported figures, the debt-to-equity ratio has risen to 1.26 as of 2026Q1, which, when combined with the volatility in interest coverage ratios, suggests that the company's balance sheet is becoming increasingly sensitive to the ongoing cyclical downturn in the U.S. housing market.
The decline in interest coverage to 231.67—while mathematically high—masks the underlying volatility in operating income, which has made debt service less predictable. The company's reliance on debt to fund operations during periods of negative free cash flow warrants caution, as it limits the financial flexibility needed to navigate a prolonged period of low housing turnover.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to FBIN because it fails to account for the significant non-cash charges and working capital volatility inherent in the post-spin-off manufacturing model, which often obscures the company's true underlying cash-generating capacity during cyclical troughs in the housing renovation market.
Analysts should prioritize EV/EBITDA or P/FCF metrics to better capture the impact of the company's capital-intensive manufacturing base and its current debt load. Relying on P/E ratios in this context risks ignoring the structural changes to the business model and the potential for earnings to be artificially smoothed by accounting adjustments.
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FBIN stock.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 20.9x. The historical average is 21.8x. This places it at the 64th percentile of its historical range.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.2x.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.4%. The historical average is 15.2%.
Based on historical data, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 20.9x. This is at the 64th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.93% with a payout ratio of 40.4%.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has 44.6% gross margin and 13.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.