Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -111.5%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $112M | $84M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $154M | $126M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.49 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 115.33 | 86.54 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 129.23 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -42.3% | -42.3% | -350.0% | -249.3% | -195.0% | -2241.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3161.2% | -3161.2% | -669.1% | -913.6% | -705.2% | -8729.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -15390.4% | -15390.4% | -1127.3% | -1382.1% | -753.0% | -8940.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -111.5% | -111.5% | -111651.6% | — | -986.7% | -636.5% |
| ROA | -79.2% | -79.2% | -321.0% | -201.0% | -183.3% | -274.4% |
| ROIC | -14.9% | -14.9% | -1652.2% | -360.4% | -412.9% | — |
| ROCE | -19.2% | -19.2% | -1699.3% | — | -643.3% | -481.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 | 0.19 | 19.89 | — | 29.85 | 0.37 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.15 | -33.92 | — | 12.55 | -0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -13.68 | -13.68 | -69.70 | -8.07 | -14.15 | -438.79 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.27 | 0.27 | 1.09 | 0.48 | 0.97 | 1.68 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.78 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 1.34 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.47 | 0.20 | 0.53 | 0.86 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.01 | 4.01 | 12.48 | 1.27 | 2.38 | 4.76 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 116.84 | 7.98 | 22.76 | 69.44 | 20.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 85.6% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 85.6% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $38724 | $160 | $16 | $12 |
Liquidity and capital exhaustion
As reported in recent financial filings, EMPD trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 103.79, a figure that appears disconnected from the company's 75.85% revenue decline and suggests that market participants are pricing the entity as a speculative digital asset proxy rather than a functional manufacturing business.
The extreme P/S multiple indicates that investors are likely ignoring the underlying powersports business in favor of the company's Bitcoin treasury strategy. This valuation approach warrants caution, as it assumes the firm can maintain its public listing and access capital markets despite the absence of positive earnings or a clear path to operational profitability.
Based on the company's reported figures, the gross margin of -42.31% highlights a fundamental inability to cover production costs, while the operating margin of -3161.23% confirms that corporate overhead remains vastly disproportionate to the firm's current revenue-generating capacity in the recreational vehicle sector.
These margins suggest that the legacy mobility business is currently a value-destroying operation rather than a source of cash flow. Investors should monitor whether management can achieve any semblance of unit-level profitability, as the current trajectory implies that every dollar of revenue generated further depletes the company's limited cash reserves.
According to quarterly statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has exhibited extreme volatility, swinging from -984 days in 2026Q1 to 387 days in 2025Q3, which reflects a lack of control over inventory and payables as the firm attempts to pivot its core business model.
The inability to maintain a stable cash conversion cycle suggests that the company is struggling to manage its supply chain and dealer relationships effectively. This inefficiency, combined with the collapse in asset turnover, indicates that the firm's operational infrastructure is not currently optimized for either manufacturing or digital asset management.
As indicated by the provided financial statements, the company's cash reserves have dwindled to approximately $9 million, a level that appears insufficient given the persistent and extreme operating losses that have characterized the firm's recent performance across all observed fiscal quarters.
The current ratio of 2.03 may provide a false sense of security, as it likely includes inventory that may be difficult to liquidate at book value. Without a significant change in the burn rate or an infusion of external capital, the company's liquidity position appears highly vulnerable to further operational shocks.
The price-to-book ratio of 0.25 is frequently misapplied to EMPD, as it suggests the company is undervalued relative to its assets, while failing to account for the fact that these assets are largely comprised of volatile digital holdings and potentially impaired manufacturing inventory.
Investors should prioritize cash burn rates and liquidity runway over traditional book value metrics, which do not reflect the company's inability to generate sustainable cash flow. Relying on P/B in this context obscures the reality that the firm's equity is being rapidly eroded by persistent operational losses.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EMPD stock.
Empery Digital Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Empery Digital Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -111.5%. The historical average is -111.5%.
Based on historical data, Empery Digital Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Empery Digital Inc. has -42.3% gross margin and -3161.2% operating margin.