Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2021–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $1.2B | $248M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $31M | $1.3B | $272M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.60 | 3223.41 | 78.37 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 253.35 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3299.73 | 86.14 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -894.8% | -894.8% | -123.8% | -41.8% | -23.5% |
| Operating Margin | -7526.2% | -7526.2% | -251.2% | -120.5% | -60.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -7782.5% | -7782.5% | -235.4% | -143.3% | -64.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -761.1% | — | -347.3% |
| ROA | -93.9% | -93.9% | -18.1% | -19.9% | -19.3% |
| ROIC | -113.1% | -113.1% | -27.4% | -23.2% | — |
| ROCE | -202.2% | -202.2% | -31.8% | -29.4% | -34.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 25.11 | — | 10.75 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 25.11 | — | 10.74 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -51.76 | -51.76 | -72.63 | -17.53 | -17.49 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.59 | 0.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.37 | 0.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.30 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.70 | 2.70 | 2.52 | 2.53 | 3.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1156.93 | 243.23 | 224.28 | 113.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $738201 | $18268 | $39102 | $39102 |
Imminent liquidity insolvency risk
According to current market data, the company trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 3.29, which appears disconnected from its negative earnings profile and suggests that investors are pricing the equity as a speculative option rather than a viable industrial manufacturing entity with sustainable long-term growth prospects.
The lack of a meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA ratio underscores the company's inability to generate positive operating income, rendering traditional valuation metrics largely irrelevant. Investors should monitor whether the current P/S multiple reflects a mispricing of the company's niche intellectual property or merely a lack of liquidity in the stock.
Based on reported financial figures, the company's ROIC has plummeted to -111.1% in 2024Q4, illustrating a severe and persistent inability to generate returns on invested capital that would justify the massive capital expenditures previously sunk into its manufacturing facilities and specialized battery production infrastructure.
The consistent negative trend in ROIC suggests that the company is destroying shareholder value with every dollar of capital deployed. This decay appears structural, as the firm has failed to achieve the necessary scale to offset the high depreciation and maintenance costs associated with its industrial equipment.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has ballooned to 466 days in 2024Q4, highlighting a profound inefficiency in managing inventory and receivables that further exacerbates the firm's already precarious liquidity position and inability to convert production into actual cash inflows.
The extremely high DSO of 446 days suggests that the company is struggling to collect payments from its industrial customers, which may indicate weak bargaining power or poor credit quality of its client base. This inefficiency in working capital management effectively traps the little cash the company has, leaving it unable to fund day-to-day operations.
According to the most recent balance sheet data, the company's current ratio of 0.51 and quick ratio of 0.44 indicate that current assets are insufficient to cover short-term liabilities, leaving the firm in a highly vulnerable position as it faces an imminent liquidity crisis with minimal cash reserves.
The reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations is particularly concerning given the company's negative gross margins, which suggest that the inventory may be worth significantly less than its carrying value. Investors should view this liquidity profile as a primary indicator of potential insolvency in the near term.
The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to this business model, as it obscures the company's inability to convert revenue into gross profit, thereby masking the fundamental reality that every additional unit of sales currently serves to increase the total cash burn rather than improve the bottom line.
Analysts should instead focus on the cash-to-burn ratio and the gross margin trajectory, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the company's survival probability. Relying on revenue multiples in a distressed industrial context ignores the reality that the company's cost structure is currently uncoupled from its commercial output.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ELPW stock.
Elong Power Holding Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Elong Power Holding Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Elong Power Holding Limited has -894.8% gross margin and -7526.2% operating margin.