Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -9.1x · EV/EBITDA 17.7x · ROE -9.5%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $162M | $83M | $97M | $161M | $219M | $495M | $406M | $274M | $772M | $569M | $729M |
| Enterprise Value | $293M | $214M | $257M | $315M | $374M | $609M | $596M | $496M | $835M | $594M | $710M |
| P/E Ratio → | -9.09 | — | — | — | 95.27 | 16.76 | 29.69 | 14.57 | 33.17 | 24.46 | 34.27 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 1.36 | 1.21 | 1.94 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.89 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.97 | 2.22 | 2.13 | 1.55 | 4.82 | 4.08 | 6.41 |
| P/FCF | 9.79 | 5.02 | — | — | — | 6.07 | 10.56 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 6.71 | 3.44 | — | 4.16 | — | 5.39 | 8.01 | 40.85 | 24.82 | 19.04 | 36.02 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 1.47 | 1.26 | 1.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.74 | 12.96 | — | 13.94 | 10.09 | 8.30 | 11.31 | 9.61 | 16.73 | 13.37 | 17.87 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | 56.57 | 13.78 | 24.56 | 17.48 | 22.22 | 15.84 | 20.13 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.93 | — | — | — | 7.46 | 15.50 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 53.4% | 53.4% | 49.2% | 50.3% | 52.6% | 54.0% | 51.9% | 53.3% | 54.6% | 55.4% | 56.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -1.6% | -5.9% | -1.5% | 1.0% | 6.3% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 6.5% | 7.9% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.9% | -2.9% | -7.0% | -1.5% | 0.4% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 3.1% | 4.1% | 5.0% | 5.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -9.5% | -9.5% | -21.7% | -4.4% | 1.0% | 14.4% | 7.4% | 11.3% | 15.5% | 18.4% | 20.9% |
| ROA | -3.8% | -3.8% | -9.3% | -1.9% | 0.4% | 5.8% | 2.7% | 5.0% | 9.0% | 12.3% | 15.4% |
| ROIC | -2.1% | -2.1% | -7.7% | -1.9% | 1.3% | 9.2% | 4.7% | 6.8% | 14.4% | 21.5% | 34.7% |
| ROCE | -2.9% | -2.9% | -10.4% | -2.4% | 1.5% | 10.8% | 5.9% | 8.9% | 18.1% | 25.2% | 32.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 1.24 | 1.27 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.91 | 8.91 | — | 8.24 | 5.40 | 2.59 | 4.50 | 4.33 | 1.27 | 0.63 | 0.10 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 1.27 | 0.39 | 0.18 | -0.18 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.93 | 7.93 | — | 6.82 | 4.17 | 1.54 | 3.61 | 4.32 | 1.26 | 0.57 | -0.50 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.91 | — | — | — | 1.39 | 4.94 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.72 | -1.72 | -8.06 | -2.08 | 1.81 | 9.36 | 3.88 | 6.35 | 6.31 | 18.86 | 181.69 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.49 | 1.77 | 1.87 | 1.92 | 2.20 | 2.06 | 2.22 | 2.02 | 2.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.20 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.64 | 0.18 | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.88 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.66 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.68 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.40 | 1.38 | 1.32 | 1.24 | 1.36 | 1.24 | 1.30 | 1.96 | 2.11 | 2.41 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.91 | 2.56 | 1.97 | 2.62 | 2.06 | 1.94 | 2.65 | 2.35 | 2.30 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1.75 | 2.31 | 4.93 | 3.38 | 2.85 | 1.61 | 3.00 | 2.98 | 0.25 | 0.38 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 1.0% | 6.0% | 3.4% | 6.9% | 3.0% | 4.1% | 2.9% |
| FCF Yield | 10.2% | 19.9% | — | — | — | 16.5% | 9.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $35M | $33M | $33M | $33M | $33M | $33M | $32M | $32M | $32M | $32M |
Liquidity and solvency pressure
According to recent market data, DLTH trades at a P/S ratio of 0.28, which suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's future revenue potential compared to more stable retail peers like Boot Barn, which commands a significantly higher valuation multiple in the current market environment.
The negative TTM P/E ratio of -9.00 highlights the company's current inability to generate consistent bottom-line earnings, rendering traditional earnings-based valuation metrics largely irrelevant. Investors appear to be pricing the stock as a distressed turnaround play, where the primary focus is on the company's ability to stabilize its top-line rather than its historical growth trajectory.
Based on reported financial figures, DLTH's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -2.0% in 2026Q3, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it, a stark contrast to the positive returns typically expected from established specialty apparel retailers.
The consistent decline in ROIC over the last ten quarters suggests that the capital invested in physical retail expansion and inventory is failing to generate adequate returns. This trend implies that the company's current business model may be structurally over-capitalized relative to its ability to drive profitable sales growth.
As reported in recent financial statements, DLTH's days inventory outstanding reached an elevated 1323 days in 2026Q3, signaling significant inefficiencies in inventory turnover that tie up critical cash and increase the risk of future markdowns compared to more agile, inventory-light retail competitors.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, which spiked to 788 days in the most recent quarter, reveals a fundamental disconnect between procurement and sales velocity. This inefficiency suggests that the company's supply chain and inventory management processes are not currently optimized for a contracting demand environment.
According to the company's latest balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to 1.10, indicating that DLTH is increasingly reliant on debt financing to sustain operations as its interest coverage ratio has deteriorated to a negative 7.18, signaling heightened risk for debt service sustainability.
The escalation in leverage during a period of revenue contraction suggests that the company is using debt to bridge operational gaps rather than for growth initiatives. This trend warrants close monitoring, as the lack of positive interest coverage may limit the company's future access to affordable capital.
As noted in recent institutional research, the P/S ratio is frequently misapplied to DLTH, as it obscures the company's high fixed-cost structure and the diminishing returns on its direct-response marketing spend, which are more critical to understanding the firm's true economic health than top-line revenue alone.
Investors should instead focus on store-level four-wall EBITDA and customer acquisition cost metrics to gauge the viability of the business model. Relying on revenue multiples ignores the reality that the company's current cost structure requires a higher sales threshold to reach break-even than the market currently accounts for.
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DLTH stock.
Duluth Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -9.1x. The historical average is 33.0x.
Duluth Holdings Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 17.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.7x.
Duluth Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -9.5%. The historical average is 16.4%.
Based on historical data, Duluth Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of -9.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Duluth Holdings Inc. has 53.4% gross margin and -1.6% operating margin.
Duluth Holdings Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.