Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -96.4%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $27M | $40M | $50M | $50M | $68M | $182M | $309M | $124M | $248M | $179M | $139M |
| Enterprise Value | $50M | $63M | $73M | $54M | $64M | $143M | $239M | $129M | $236M | $172M | $138M |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.73 | 1.07 | 1.39 | 1.59 | 1.95 | 4.53 | 7.84 | 5.45 | 12.26 | 13.41 | 16.89 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.53 | 6.74 | 4.46 | 2.13 | 1.91 | 2.90 | 3.91 | 36.33 | 14.66 | 17.49 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.69 | 2.06 | 1.73 | 1.83 | 3.57 | 6.06 | 5.64 | 11.64 | 12.87 | 16.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71.5% | 71.5% | 69.9% | 70.6% | 59.8% | 72.5% | 72.0% | 67.7% | 63.0% | 58.8% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | -38.4% | -38.4% | -46.2% | -102.8% | -90.9% | -56.7% | -26.3% | -83.3% | -77.0% | -73.6% | -140.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -22.1% | -22.1% | -58.2% | -94.1% | -94.6% | -61.2% | -19.9% | -84.6% | -85.0% | -63.2% | -145.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -96.4% | -96.4% | -120.5% | -99.7% | -67.0% | -34.6% | -19.0% | -189.3% | -126.6% | -172.9% | -308.6% |
| ROA | -17.9% | -17.9% | -41.2% | -50.2% | -43.0% | -27.4% | -13.4% | -64.1% | -60.5% | -50.1% | -114.0% |
| ROIC | -33.6% | -33.6% | -39.7% | -81.3% | -84.8% | -103.1% | -93.9% | -232.5% | -314.2% | -694.6% | -826.3% |
| ROCE | -39.5% | -39.5% | -43.1% | -69.3% | -48.7% | -29.2% | -21.3% | -86.9% | -73.4% | -99.1% | -194.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.93 | 4.93 | 2.42 | 0.79 | 0.52 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4.84 | 0.59 | 0.97 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.87 | 2.13 | 0.18 | -0.11 | -0.61 | -0.89 | 1.26 | -0.73 | -0.71 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -2.29 | -2.29 | -15.02 | -189.39 | — | — | -8.63 | -18.70 | -11.20 | -11.20 | -51.12 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.20 | 1.77 | 3.48 | 4.70 | 8.12 | 2.10 | 4.32 | 2.64 | 1.29 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.92 | 1.51 | 3.12 | 4.35 | 7.86 | 1.89 | 4.20 | 2.54 | 1.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.97 | 2.28 | 3.81 | 7.03 | 1.23 | 3.42 | 2.21 | 0.86 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.83 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.85 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.92 | 2.48 | 4.03 | 2.32 | 4.13 | 3.48 | 8.99 | 6.94 | 4.74 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 74.35 | 75.06 | 71.12 | 59.61 | 41.16 | 47.73 | 71.62 | 71.07 | 60.17 | 63.76 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.2% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $62M | $54M | $45M | $44M | $43M | $39M | $32M | $31M | $28M | $25M |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
According to recent market data, CTSO trades at a P/S multiple of 0.68, which significantly trails established medical technology peers and suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's valuation due to the binary nature of its ongoing US regulatory approval process for the DrugSorb-ATR system.
The current valuation appears to reflect a market that is pricing in the high probability of future equity dilution rather than the long-term potential of the adsorbent polymer platform. This multiple is notably lower than peers like LeMaitre Vascular, implying that the market views CTSO as a speculative clinical-stage entity rather than a commercial-stage medical device manufacturer.
As reported in financial statements, CTSO has consistently generated negative ROIC figures, with the most recent quarter showing -10.1%, indicating that the company is currently destroying shareholder value as it continues to fund extensive clinical trials without achieving the necessary commercial scale to generate positive returns.
The persistent inability to achieve positive ROIC suggests that the capital invested in R&D and regulatory infrastructure has yet to translate into a self-sustaining economic engine. Investors should monitor whether the transition from clinical development to commercialization can reverse this trend, as current returns remain well below the cost of capital.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 137 days in 2026Q1, which highlights the operational challenges of managing inventory and receivables while attempting to scale a specialized medical device business in the competitive European critical care market.
The high DIO, which reached 161 days in the most recent quarter, suggests that the company may be carrying excess inventory or facing slower-than-expected sales velocity for its adsorbent cartridges. This inefficiency ties up critical liquidity that the firm cannot afford to lose given its current cash-constrained position.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 8.64 as of 2026Q1, a dramatic increase from 0.79 in 2023Q4, which indicates that the firm is increasingly reliant on debt financing to bridge the gap between its operational cash burn and its clinical development milestones.
This rapid rise in leverage warrants close monitoring, as the company's negative interest coverage ratio suggests that debt service is becoming increasingly difficult to manage. The reliance on debt in a pre-profit state creates a precarious financial structure that leaves little room for operational error.
Investors frequently misapply the P/S ratio to CTSO, which obscures the company's underlying cash burn and the binary nature of its regulatory risk, as this metric fails to account for the high R&D intensity required to maintain the firm's competitive position in the extracorporeal blood purification market.
A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the cash runway or the burn-to-liquidity ratio, which better captures the immediate threat of dilution. Relying on revenue multiples ignores the reality that the company's terminal value is tied to regulatory success rather than current sales volume.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CTSO stock.
Cytosorbents Corporation's current P/E ratio is -3.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Cytosorbents Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -96.4%. The historical average is -154.6%.
Based on historical data, Cytosorbents Corporation is trading at a P/E of -3.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cytosorbents Corporation has 71.5% gross margin and -38.4% operating margin.