Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -29.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -32.6%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.3B | $614M | $326M | $85M | $40M | $101M | $105M | $160M | $101M | $212M | $221M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.3B | $610M | $319M | $73M | $29M | $41M | $91M | $158M | $-13635300 | $122M | $86M |
| P/E Ratio → | -29.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 20.36 | 10.03 | 10.02 | 2.18 | 0.71 | 1.04 | 1.45 | 2.25 | 0.92 | 2.50 | 1.66 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -32.6% | -32.6% | -174.9% | -57.0% | -53.9% | -51.1% | -8.4% | -51.4% | -48.1% | -51.2% | -71.5% |
| ROA | -21.8% | -21.8% | -108.8% | -47.5% | -46.5% | -44.4% | -7.1% | -46.2% | -44.1% | -47.4% | -30.5% |
| ROIC | -78.1% | -78.1% | -78.9% | -48.1% | -58.9% | -60.8% | -51.6% | -112.9% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -90.2% | -90.2% | -76.3% | -48.7% | -41.4% | -44.6% | -59.6% | -53.2% | -50.4% | -51.9% | -32.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.06 | -0.23 | -0.29 | -0.19 | -0.62 | -0.20 | -0.03 | -1.04 | -1.06 | -1.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | -2575.33 | -11.10 | -22.39 | -20.56 | — | -60.52 |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($937000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.21 | 6.21 | 1.54 | 4.07 | 4.06 | 7.36 | 3.73 | 7.76 | 14.51 | 9.06 | 18.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.21 | 6.21 | 1.54 | 4.07 | 4.06 | 7.36 | 3.73 | 7.76 | 14.59 | 9.15 | 18.51 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.05 | 6.05 | 1.47 | 3.95 | 3.93 | 7.17 | 3.64 | 7.63 | 14.51 | 9.06 | 18.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $80M | $61M | $48M | $47M | $42M | $29M | $29M | $28M | $20M | $15M |
Acute clinical financing insolvency
According to recent market data, Corvus trades at a price-to-book ratio of 17.58, which appears to be a significant premium relative to peers like Nkarta, suggesting that investors are pricing in the potential for future clinical breakthroughs rather than the company's current, highly constrained financial reality.
The elevated P/B ratio indicates that the market is valuing the company's intellectual property and pipeline potential rather than its tangible assets, which remain negligible. This valuation level warrants caution, as it implies a high expectation for successful clinical readouts that may not be supported by the firm's current, precarious cash position.
As reported in financial statements, Corvus has consistently posted negative ROIC figures, with a -8.6% return in 2026Q1, reflecting the structural challenge of funding high-cost clinical development without the benefit of commercial revenue to offset the significant capital invested in its oncology pipeline.
The persistent decay in returns on invested capital highlights the difficulty of achieving profitability in a clinical-stage model where R&D expenditures are non-discretionary. Investors should monitor whether the company can improve these returns through more efficient trial design or if the current trajectory of capital destruction will continue to necessitate dilutive financing.
Based on Corvus's reported figures, the current ratio has fluctuated significantly, reaching 19.81 in 2026Q1, yet this metric is misleading as it masks the company's inability to generate sufficient cash to cover its ongoing operational burn rate and clinical trial obligations.
While the current ratio appears high, it does not account for the rapid depletion of cash reserves, which have fallen to approximately $4.58 million. This suggests that the firm's liquidity position is highly vulnerable to even minor delays in milestone payments or unexpected increases in clinical trial costs.
As evidenced by peer comparison data, Corvus lags behind competitors like Arcus Biosciences in terms of financial stability, with a significantly smaller cash cushion that leaves the company more exposed to the volatility of biotech funding cycles and the necessity for dilutive capital raises.
The gap between Corvus and its peers appears structural, as the company lacks the substantial big-pharma backing that provides other firms with a longer operational runway. This disparity suggests that Corvus may face higher financing costs and greater pressure to achieve positive clinical data in a shorter timeframe than its better-capitalized competitors.
According to financial analysis standards, the current ratio is frequently misapplied to clinical-stage biotechs like Corvus, as it obscures the reality that the company's assets are largely illiquid and its primary obligation is the ongoing, non-discretionary burn required to sustain its clinical trial pipeline.
Investors should instead focus on the 'cash runway' metric, which measures the number of months the company can survive at its current burn rate. Relying on traditional liquidity ratios like the current or quick ratio provides a false sense of security that ignores the existential threat posed by the company's limited cash reserves.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CRVS stock.
Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -29.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -32.6%. The historical average is -60.0%.
Based on historical data, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -29.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.