Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -83.0x · EV/EBITDA 8.0x · ROE -5.2%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.2B | $4.6B | $6.6B | $5.8B | $6.7B | $8.2B | $4.3B | $3.0B | $1.8B | $913M | $506M |
| Enterprise Value | $7.7B | $6.1B | $8.1B | $7.6B | $9.1B | $8.9B | $4.5B | $3.3B | $1.8B | $740M | $359M |
| P/E Ratio → | -83.03 | — | 6.90 | 7.30 | 12.45 | 11.26 | 13.74 | 25.08 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.54 | 1.15 | 1.60 | 1.46 | 1.89 | 3.53 | 3.10 | 2.44 | 1.63 | 0.89 | 0.49 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.22 | 3.58 | 3.57 | 3.98 | 8.22 | 580.17 | 14.78 | 22.79 | 11.83 | 2.48 | 1.27 |
| P/FCF | 9.46 | 7.03 | 7.10 | 7.10 | 13.47 | 15.98 | 19.10 | 56.32 | 17.40 | 10.73 | 28.83 |
| P/OCF | 8.77 | 6.53 | 6.60 | 6.22 | 11.15 | 14.40 | 16.09 | 33.42 | 15.57 | 9.29 | 12.74 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.51 | 1.97 | 1.93 | 2.57 | 3.86 | 3.27 | 2.67 | 1.63 | 0.72 | 0.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.98 | 6.33 | 7.40 | 6.94 | 10.25 | 12.48 | 18.74 | 21.53 | 19.22 | 14.66 | 12.86 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.69 | 6.89 | 7.92 | 7.36 | 10.68 | 13.01 | 21.20 | 25.72 | 26.81 | 38.83 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.28 | 8.75 | 9.37 | 18.29 | 17.45 | 20.15 | 61.64 | 17.34 | 8.69 | 20.42 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 57.0% | 58.8% | 55.0% | 52.3% | 61.4% | 54.1% | 50.1% | 51.5% | 50.5% | 48.3% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 22.0% | 24.9% | 26.4% | 23.9% | 29.5% | 15.4% | 10.5% | 5.8% | 1.7% | -0.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.0% | -2.0% | 23.2% | 20.0% | 15.2% | 31.4% | 22.6% | 9.7% | 4.6% | 1.0% | -1.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -5.2% | -5.2% | 57.8% | 69.8% | 129.8% | 476.3% | 148.1% | 84.7% | 19.5% | 2.7% | -4.0% |
| ROA | -1.8% | -1.8% | 20.1% | 17.3% | 17.9% | 54.5% | 33.7% | 19.8% | 10.0% | 1.8% | -2.8% |
| ROIC | 21.7% | 21.7% | 23.0% | 24.1% | 32.0% | 79.4% | 34.1% | 34.4% | 27.8% | 5.8% | -1.7% |
| ROCE | 23.5% | 23.5% | 25.5% | 26.8% | 33.9% | 68.9% | 32.7% | 33.6% | 18.8% | 4.3% | -1.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.93 | 1.37 | 3.17 | 68.42 | 1.29 | 2.98 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.56 | 1.81 | 2.92 | 1.35 | 1.54 | 2.58 | 1.30 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.15 | 0.83 | 1.27 | 2.94 | 53.28 | 0.81 | 2.15 | -0.04 | -0.47 | -0.37 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.39 | 1.68 | 2.70 | 1.05 | 0.98 | 1.86 | -0.06 | -3.44 | -5.30 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.25 | 1.65 | 2.27 | 4.82 | 1.47 | 1.05 | 5.32 | -0.05 | -2.04 | -8.41 |
| Interest Coverage | 10.05 | 10.05 | 9.33 | 6.43 | 6.28 | 31.67 | 31.70 | 14.82 | 69.23 | 21.92 | -7.63 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 | 1.18 | 1.30 | 1.60 | 1.72 | 1.69 | 1.65 | 2.06 | 2.71 | 2.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 0.98 | 1.39 | 1.88 | 1.87 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.68 | 1.11 | 1.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 1.50 | 1.24 | 1.67 | 2.32 | 1.88 | 1.83 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.72 | 4.72 | 4.75 | 4.64 | 3.59 | 4.18 | 3.63 | 3.57 | 4.24 | 3.88 | 3.65 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 30.09 | 25.26 | 30.51 | 33.80 | 34.27 | 42.80 | 35.07 | 36.35 | 34.89 | 33.79 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 2.4% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 14.5% | 13.7% | 8.0% | 8.9% | 7.3% | 4.0% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.6% | 14.2% | 14.1% | 14.1% | 7.4% | 6.3% | 5.2% | 1.8% | 5.7% | 9.3% | 3.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 9.4% | 12.7% | 8.6% | 3.3% | 0.2% | 12.5% | 4.0% | 4.9% | 13.9% | 5.5% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.4% | 12.7% | 8.6% | 3.3% | 0.2% | 12.5% | 4.0% | 5.0% | 15.1% | 6.8% | 2.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $54M | $60M | $62M | $62M | $64M | $69M | $72M | $68M | $72M | $74M |
Acquisition integration and leverage
According to current market data, Crocs trades at a forward P/E of 9.35, which suggests that investors are pricing in significant long-term stagnation despite the company's historical ability to maintain premium pricing power through its unique, resin-based footwear and accessory ecosystem.
The disconnect between the negative trailing P/E of -85.17 and the forward multiple indicates that the market is heavily discounting the impact of recent non-operating charges. This valuation appears to reflect a 'value trap' concern, where the market remains unconvinced that the HEYDUDE integration will return to historical growth trajectories.
Based on reported figures, ROIC has fluctuated between 3.9% and 7.1% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company is struggling to consistently compound returns on its invested capital following the capital-intensive acquisition of the HEYDUDE brand.
The volatility in ROIC suggests that management's capital allocation strategy is currently hampered by integration costs and asset impairments. Investors should monitor whether the company can stabilize these returns above its cost of capital as the product mix shifts toward more complex, multi-component footwear designs.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has remained elevated, peaking at 73 days in 2025Q3, which highlights the company's ongoing reliance on aggressive inventory management to support its seasonal footwear and accessory distribution channels across global markets.
The persistent DIO levels, which have hovered around 80-89 days, suggest that inventory turnover is not keeping pace with the company's historical standards. This inefficiency may indicate that the current product mix is facing slower sell-through rates, necessitating a more cautious approach to future inventory procurement.
According to recent quarterly balance sheet data, the D/E ratio has declined from a peak of 1.37 in 2023Q4 to 0.28 in 2026Q1, suggesting a rapid, albeit potentially aggressive, effort to reduce debt burdens following the HEYDUDE acquisition.
While the reduction in debt is a positive signal for solvency, the rapid shift warrants further investigation into whether this was achieved through organic cash flow or by sacrificing necessary growth investments. The interest coverage ratio, which remains in the single digits, suggests that debt service remains manageable but sensitive to any further earnings volatility.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model, as it is heavily distorted by non-recurring impairment charges and acquisition-related accounting adjustments that do not reflect the underlying cash-generating power of the core footwear operations.
Analysts should prioritize EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to better capture the operational reality of the business, as these metrics strip away the noise of non-operating items. Relying on P/E in this context likely leads to an inaccurate assessment of the company's true valuation and its ability to navigate current cyclical headwinds.
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CROX stock.
Crocs, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -83.0x. The historical average is 27.1x.
Crocs, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.8x.
Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -5.2%. The historical average is 61.9%.
Based on historical data, Crocs, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -83.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Crocs, Inc. has 57.0% gross margin and 22.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Crocs, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.