Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2020–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8580 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $74M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -155.1% | -155.1% | -44.0% | -42.4% | -40.9% | -29.7% |
| Operating Margin | -235.9% | -235.9% | -128.8% | -5.8% | -99.6% | -75.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -309.4% | -309.4% | -207.1% | 15.4% | -103.0% | -292.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -73.9% | 3.7% | -33.6% | -101.8% |
| ROA | -198.1% | -198.1% | -42.4% | 3.1% | -22.9% | -60.5% |
| ROIC | -2707.4% | -2707.4% | -23.3% | -1.1% | -35.2% | — |
| ROCE | -306.2% | -306.2% | -30.2% | -1.3% | -28.3% | -22.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 5.89 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 12.42 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 4.65 | 0.15 | -0.44 | -0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 11.73 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.47 | -7.47 | -20.96 | -39.63 | -28.78 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.57 | 1.31 | 4.36 | 1.75 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.43 | 0.43 | 1.08 | -11.51 | 3.69 | 1.06 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 1.09 | 3.20 | 0.84 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.10 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.32 | 6.32 | 2.48 | 2.85 | 2.71 | 1.25 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 114.88 | 129.95 | 184.53 | 126.96 | 91.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $21M | $27M | $16M | $10M |
Immediate insolvency and dilution
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's gross margin of -37.2% in 2024Q2 highlights a structural inability to cover production costs, suggesting that the current manufacturing process remains fundamentally uneconomic despite the company's success in securing high-profile Tier 1 automotive supply contracts.
The persistent negative gross margin indicates that variable costs, including raw materials and high scrap rates, significantly exceed the revenue generated per unit. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve the necessary scale to reach positive contribution margins, as current figures suggest the business is effectively subsidizing its customers' weight-reduction initiatives.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's ROIC of -16.0% in 2024Q2 reflects a significant destruction of invested capital, a trend that appears to be driven by the high fixed-cost burden of the Mega-line technology relative to the current low volume of output.
The inability to generate a positive return on invested capital suggests that the company's capital-intensive manufacturing strategy has yet to reach the critical threshold required for efficiency. This negative trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's proprietary technology can ever achieve the yields necessary to justify its substantial asset base.
According to recent filings, the company's DSO of 138 days and DIO of 85 days in 2024Q2 reveal significant inefficiencies in the cash conversion cycle, suggesting that the firm faces substantial challenges in managing its inventory and collecting payments from its OEM customer base.
These elevated metrics imply that capital is being trapped in the production process for extended periods, further exacerbating the company's liquidity constraints. The lack of a clear trend toward shortening these cycles suggests that operational leverage remains elusive and that the company's working capital management is currently a drag on cash flow.
As indicated by the 2024Q2 current ratio of 1.12, the company maintains a precarious liquidity position that provides little buffer against operational volatility, especially given the high cash burn rate and the company's reliance on external financing to sustain its capital-intensive manufacturing operations.
The quick ratio of 0.83 further underscores the company's dependence on inventory liquidation to meet short-term obligations, which is a risky position for a firm with high scrap rates. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional funding, as the current cash position appears insufficient to support long-term growth objectives.
The most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the Price-to-Sales ratio, which obscures the company's deeply negative gross margins and the fact that each additional dollar of revenue currently increases the firm's total cash burn rather than contributing to operational profitability.
Investors should instead focus on the 'Contribution Margin per Unit' or 'Manufacturing Yield' as primary indicators of business health. Relying on revenue multiples in this context is misleading because it ignores the fundamental cost structure imbalance that currently prevents the company from achieving a sustainable path to profitability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CREVW stock.
Based on historical data, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant has -155.1% gross margin and -235.9% operating margin.