Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2020–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $985669 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $76M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -155.1% | -155.1% | -44.0% | -42.4% | -40.9% | -29.7% |
| Operating Margin | -235.9% | -235.9% | -128.8% | -5.8% | -99.6% | -75.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -309.4% | -309.4% | -207.1% | 15.4% | -103.0% | -292.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -73.9% | 3.7% | -33.6% | -101.8% |
| ROA | -198.1% | -198.1% | -42.4% | 3.1% | -22.9% | -60.5% |
| ROIC | -2707.4% | -2707.4% | -23.3% | -1.1% | -35.2% | — |
| ROCE | -306.2% | -306.2% | -30.2% | -1.3% | -28.3% | -22.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 5.89 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 12.42 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 4.65 | 0.15 | -0.44 | -0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 11.73 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.47 | -7.47 | -20.96 | -39.63 | -28.78 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.57 | 1.31 | 4.36 | 1.75 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.43 | 0.43 | 1.08 | -11.51 | 3.69 | 1.06 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 1.09 | 3.20 | 0.84 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.10 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.32 | 6.32 | 2.48 | 2.85 | 2.71 | 1.25 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 114.88 | 129.95 | 184.53 | 126.96 | 91.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $21M | $27M | $16M | $10M |
Existential liquidity and solvency
According to current market data, CREV trades at a P/S multiple of 0.02, a valuation level that suggests investors are heavily discounting the company's ability to achieve long-term manufacturing viability rather than pricing it as a traditional automotive component manufacturer with stable earnings potential.
The extremely low P/S ratio reflects a market sentiment that views the company's current revenue as secondary to its massive cash burn and capital requirements. This valuation implies that the market is pricing in a binary outcome, where the company either achieves a breakthrough in manufacturing scale or faces a total loss of equity value.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -16.0% in 2024Q2, which indicates that the capital invested in automated manufacturing infrastructure is currently failing to generate any economic return for shareholders compared to historical industry benchmarks.
The persistent decay in ROIC highlights the fundamental challenge of scaling a high-fixed-cost manufacturing process that has not yet reached the necessary volume to amortize its asset base. This trend suggests that further capital injections may continue to be value-destructive unless the company can drastically improve its yield rates.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's DSO of 138 days and DIO of 85 days in 2024Q2 reveal significant inefficiencies in the cash conversion cycle, which further exacerbates the strain on the company's limited liquidity position during this critical scaling phase.
The extended collection and inventory holding periods suggest that the company lacks the bargaining power typically seen in mature Tier-1 automotive suppliers. This inefficiency forces the company to tie up precious cash in working capital, leaving less room for operational flexibility in a high-burn environment.
Based on the 2024Q2 data, the current ratio of 1.12 provides only a marginal buffer against short-term liabilities, which appears increasingly vulnerable when contrasted with the company's historical volatility and the significant cash burn required to maintain its specialized automated production lines.
The liquidity position is particularly concerning given the company's reliance on non-liquid assets and the absence of a robust cash cushion. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional financing, as the current ratio suggests little room for error in the event of a production delay or supply chain disruption.
The P/S ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model, as it obscures the company's underlying cost-price mismatch and fails to account for the fact that revenue growth is currently driving higher losses rather than providing meaningful operating leverage.
Using revenue multiples for a company in a pre-scale manufacturing phase ignores the critical importance of 'First Time Through' yield rates and capacity utilization. Analysts should instead focus on unit-level contribution margins and cash-burn-to-milestone ratios to better assess the company's progress toward a sustainable business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CREV stock.
Based on historical data, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares has -155.1% gross margin and -235.9% operating margin.