Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.8x · EV/EBITDA 14.5x · ROE 10.2%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.4B | $3.0B | $4.9B | $4.9B | $5.5B | $6.5B | $5.8B | $6.9B | $5.9B | $5.1B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.8B | $3.4B | $4.8B | $4.9B | $5.5B | $6.1B | $5.5B | $6.6B | $5.5B | $4.4B | $3.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.76 | 17.00 | 21.97 | 19.45 | 17.69 | 18.28 | 53.94 | 20.74 | 22.07 | 48.24 | 21.43 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 1.46 | 1.40 | 1.59 | 2.07 | 2.33 | 2.26 | 2.11 | 2.05 | 1.73 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.05 | 1.76 | 2.76 | 2.52 | 2.85 | 3.25 | 3.18 | 3.71 | 3.50 | 3.06 | 2.60 |
| P/FCF | 15.47 | 13.92 | 11.39 | 8.40 | — | 20.24 | 23.59 | 42.38 | 26.43 | 17.60 | 18.29 |
| P/OCF | 11.85 | 10.66 | 10.00 | 7.68 | — | 18.26 | 21.13 | 24.04 | 20.44 | 14.85 | 14.96 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.01 | 1.43 | 1.42 | 1.58 | 1.95 | 2.18 | 2.17 | 1.96 | 1.78 | 1.51 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.47 | 13.19 | 14.78 | 13.42 | 10.70 | 10.76 | 19.26 | 12.80 | 13.40 | 13.60 | 8.31 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.50 | 16.86 | 17.83 | 14.74 | 12.75 | 13.53 | 29.84 | 16.74 | 15.62 | 16.70 | 13.88 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.88 | 11.19 | 8.50 | — | 19.06 | 22.09 | 40.83 | 24.48 | 15.26 | 15.90 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.2% | 50.2% | 50.2% | 49.6% | 49.4% | 51.6% | 48.9% | 49.8% | 49.5% | 47.0% | 46.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 6.0% | 8.0% | 8.9% | 11.3% | 14.4% | 5.5% | 13.0% | 12.5% | 10.7% | 10.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.2% | 5.2% | 6.6% | 7.2% | 9.0% | 11.3% | 4.3% | 10.9% | 9.6% | 4.3% | 8.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.2% | 10.2% | 12.0% | 13.0% | 15.9% | 18.5% | 5.9% | 18.7% | 16.1% | 6.5% | 12.8% |
| ROA | 6.0% | 6.0% | 7.6% | 8.4% | 10.0% | 11.8% | 3.7% | 12.5% | 11.7% | 5.0% | 9.9% |
| ROIC | 8.0% | 8.0% | 11.0% | 12.0% | 16.9% | 22.0% | 6.7% | 20.8% | 23.6% | 19.5% | 18.3% |
| ROCE | 9.3% | 9.3% | 11.9% | 13.3% | 16.4% | 18.9% | 6.0% | 19.3% | 19.7% | 15.4% | 16.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.24 | — | — | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.32 | 3.32 | 1.37 | 1.11 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 1.48 | 0.84 | — | — | 0.03 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.25 | -0.05 | 0.03 | -0.03 | -0.19 | -0.20 | -0.14 | -0.26 | -0.41 | -0.34 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.63 | 1.63 | -0.25 | 0.16 | -0.10 | -0.67 | -1.31 | -0.48 | -1.07 | -2.08 | -1.25 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.96 | -0.19 | 0.10 | — | -1.18 | -1.50 | -1.55 | -1.96 | -2.34 | -2.39 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 612.98 | 247.78 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.59 | 2.59 | 2.62 | 3.38 | 2.89 | 3.11 | 3.36 | 2.97 | 3.08 | 3.64 | 3.89 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.72 | 2.13 | 1.50 | 2.16 | 2.35 | 2.01 | 2.17 | 2.63 | 2.55 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 1.28 | 0.58 | 1.31 | 1.43 | 1.09 | 1.22 | 1.69 | 1.52 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.16 | 1.13 | 1.19 | 1.14 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 1.04 | 1.18 | 1.11 | 1.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.43 | 2.35 | 1.70 | 2.35 | 2.30 | 2.52 | 2.71 | 2.85 | 2.60 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 43.32 | 45.24 | 44.28 | 57.69 | 56.95 | 66.09 | 58.57 | 58.53 | 54.00 | 51.24 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.9% | 2.2% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 37.0% | 37.0% | 31.2% | 29.2% | 24.1% | 19.4% | 15.9% | 19.7% | 23.4% | 48.4% | 25.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.1% | 5.9% | 4.6% | 5.1% | 5.7% | 5.5% | 1.9% | 4.8% | 4.5% | 2.1% | 4.7% |
| FCF Yield | 6.5% | 7.2% | 8.8% | 11.9% | — | 4.9% | 4.2% | 2.4% | 3.8% | 5.7% | 5.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 6.0% | 6.7% | 6.5% | 3.8% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 1.8% | 3.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.9% | 8.8% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 6.6% | 3.6% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 4.5% | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $55M | $59M | $61M | $63M | $66M | $67M | $68M | $70M | $70M | $71M |
Seasonal Inventory Liquidity Risk
Based on recent market data, COLM trades at a forward P/E of 16.77, which appears to reflect a market consensus that the company is a mature, low-growth entity rather than a high-momentum apparel player, especially when compared to the premium multiples commanded by growth-oriented peers like Deckers Outdoor.
The current valuation suggests investors are pricing in limited top-line expansion, as the PEG ratio of 1.34 indicates that the market is not assigning a significant premium for future earnings growth. This valuation warrants caution, as any further deceleration in revenue could lead to multiple compression toward the lower end of the historical range.
As reported in financial statements, COLM's ROIC has struggled to maintain momentum, hovering near 1.6% in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company is currently failing to compound capital effectively compared to the double-digit returns generated by more efficient operators within the broader consumer apparel sector.
The persistent gap between gross margins and ROIC indicates that high operating expenses and inefficient asset utilization are eroding the returns on invested capital. Investors should monitor whether management can improve capital allocation, as the current low returns may indicate that the business is over-capitalized for its current growth trajectory.
According to recent quarterly filings, COLM's cash conversion cycle remains elevated at 126 days in 2026Q1, primarily driven by high days inventory outstanding, which highlights the structural difficulty of managing seasonal product lines without incurring significant carrying costs that weigh on overall operational efficiency.
The reliance on long inventory cycles suggests that the company is highly vulnerable to shifts in consumer demand, as excess stock must be cleared through lower-margin channels. This inefficiency appears to be a structural feature of the business model rather than a temporary issue, limiting the company's ability to optimize cash flow.
Based on the most recent balance sheet data, COLM maintains a robust current ratio of 3.07, providing a substantial liquidity cushion that appears designed to absorb the intense working capital swings inherent in its seasonal business model, as evidenced by the company's consistent ability to meet short-term obligations.
While this liquidity position is undeniably strong, it may also indicate an overly conservative approach to capital management that leaves significant cash idle on the balance sheet. This fortress-like stance provides safety during downturns but may be hindering the company's ability to generate higher returns for shareholders.
A critical review of the company's financial profile suggests that the P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for COLM, as it obscures the significant impact of seasonal working capital volatility and non-operational interest income on the company's reported net earnings and overall valuation.
Investors should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, which better account for the company's cash-heavy balance sheet and the cyclical nature of its inventory-driven cash flows. Relying solely on P/E risks misinterpreting the company's true earning power by failing to adjust for the structural distortions caused by its seasonal business cycle.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying COLM stock.
Columbia Sportswear Company's current P/E ratio is 19.8x. The historical average is 21.0x. This places it at the 61th percentile of its historical range.
Columbia Sportswear Company's current EV/EBITDA is 14.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.6x.
Columbia Sportswear Company's return on equity (ROE) is 10.2%. The historical average is 15.7%.
Based on historical data, Columbia Sportswear Company is trading at a P/E of 19.8x. This is at the 61th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Columbia Sportswear Company's current dividend yield is 1.87% with a payout ratio of 37.0%.
Columbia Sportswear Company has 50.2% gross margin and 6.0% operating margin.
Columbia Sportswear Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.