Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.0x · EV/EBITDA 23.4x · ROE 47.4%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $46.1B | $49.7B | $83.0B | $63.4B | $38.9B | $49.9B | $39.4B | $23.7B | $12.1B | $8.3B | $11.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $55.6B | $59.2B | $86.8B | $66.9B | $42.3B | $52.6B | $41.9B | $26.1B | $11.8B | $8.1B | $11.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.04 | 32.46 | 54.32 | 51.39 | 43.36 | 76.02 | 110.92 | 66.96 | 66.46 | 48.17 | 490.26 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.86 | 4.17 | 7.34 | 6.42 | 4.51 | 6.61 | 6.58 | 4.24 | 2.48 | 1.84 | 2.88 |
| P/B Ratio | 16.78 | 17.55 | 22.71 | 20.70 | 16.44 | 21.70 | 19.50 | 14.07 | 8.38 | 6.05 | 8.01 |
| P/FCF | 31.83 | 34.32 | 54.92 | 51.83 | 46.13 | 59.37 | 135.63 | 61.08 | 36.15 | 32.97 | 124.32 |
| P/OCF | 21.80 | 23.50 | 39.43 | 35.53 | 29.43 | 38.88 | 59.35 | 32.82 | 19.43 | 17.67 | 32.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.96 | 7.67 | 6.77 | 4.90 | 6.96 | 7.01 | 4.66 | 2.43 | 1.80 | 2.86 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.41 | 24.92 | 38.55 | 35.62 | 29.22 | 49.60 | 79.34 | 39.67 | 25.70 | 18.59 | 61.63 |
| EV / EBIT | 27.61 | 29.40 | 43.72 | 40.94 | 34.91 | 62.16 | 124.75 | 54.49 | 35.47 | 27.22 | 147.48 |
| EV / FCF | — | 40.88 | 57.43 | 54.68 | 50.10 | 62.60 | 144.40 | 67.20 | 35.40 | 32.24 | 123.34 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | 25.4% | 26.7% | 26.2% | 23.9% | 22.6% | 17.4% | 20.5% | 18.7% | 16.9% | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | 16.9% | 16.9% | 15.8% | 13.4% | 10.7% | 4.8% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 6.0% | 0.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.9% | 12.9% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 10.4% | 8.7% | 5.9% | 6.3% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 0.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 47.4% | 47.4% | 45.7% | 45.3% | 38.5% | 30.2% | 19.2% | 22.4% | 12.6% | 12.7% | 1.3% |
| ROA | 16.9% | 16.9% | 17.8% | 16.4% | 13.2% | 10.3% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.2% | 8.7% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 15.3% | 15.3% | 20.5% | 19.0% | 16.2% | 12.6% | 5.0% | 12.7% | 16.3% | 16.3% | 1.6% |
| ROCE | 25.4% | 25.4% | 25.5% | 23.9% | 19.7% | 14.7% | 6.0% | 14.2% | 14.6% | 15.6% | 1.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.48 | 3.48 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.58 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 1.69 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.15 | 4.15 | 2.02 | 2.16 | 2.58 | 3.32 | 5.97 | 4.34 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.36 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 1.41 | 1.18 | 1.26 | 1.41 | -0.17 | -0.14 | -0.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1.68 | 1.86 | 2.31 | 2.55 | 4.82 | 3.61 | -0.54 | -0.43 | -0.49 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.56 | 2.51 | 2.86 | 3.97 | 3.22 | 8.77 | 6.11 | -0.75 | -0.74 | -0.97 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.52 | 1.57 | 1.28 | 1.58 | 1.73 | 1.61 | 1.81 | 1.94 | 1.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.48 | 1.53 | 1.24 | 1.54 | 1.70 | 1.57 | 1.76 | 1.88 | 1.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.88 | 0.88 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 0.98 | 1.23 | 1.16 | 1.32 | 1.50 | 1.57 | 1.48 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.33 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.25 | 1.13 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 2.15 | 2.19 | 1.93 |
| Inventory Turnover | 179.76 | 179.76 | 169.51 | 185.34 | 184.27 | 177.91 | 186.94 | 170.29 | 183.44 | 187.32 | 226.79 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 7.59 | 6.81 | 6.23 | 6.54 | 9.37 | 23.62 | 7.07 | 4.67 | 4.06 | 4.26 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 3.1% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 0.2% |
| FCF Yield | 3.1% | 2.9% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 2.2% | 1.7% | 0.7% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 3.0% | 0.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.3% | 4.9% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 2.1% | 0.9% | 0.1% | 0.8% | 1.3% | 3.5% | 7.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.3% | 4.9% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 2.1% | 0.9% | 0.1% | 0.8% | 1.3% | 3.5% | 7.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.5B |
Margin compression and leverage
According to recent market data, CMG trades at a forward P/E of 29.36, which appears increasingly difficult to justify given the deceleration in top-line growth and the recent contraction in operating margins observed in the company's latest quarterly financial statements.
The current valuation multiple suggests that investors are still pricing in a high-growth trajectory that may no longer align with the company's recent operational performance. When compared to peers like Texas Roadhouse, the premium valuation warrants caution, as the market may be underestimating the risks associated with unit-level saturation and potential cannibalization.
Based on reported financial figures, ROIC has trended downward from 6.3% in 2024Q2 to a mere 3.0% in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is struggling to generate adequate returns on its heavy investments in new store construction and digital infrastructure.
This decline in return on invested capital suggests that the marginal utility of new unit expansion is diminishing, likely due to rising construction costs and increased competition for prime real estate. Investors should monitor whether management can reverse this trend or if the current capital allocation strategy is leading to long-term value destruction.
As indicated by quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has shifted from -3 days in 2025Q2 to -12 days in 2026Q1, reflecting significant fluctuations in inventory management and the timing of supplier payments that complicate the company's underlying cash flow predictability.
While a negative cash conversion cycle is typically a sign of operational strength in the restaurant industry, the extreme volatility observed here suggests potential supply chain friction or aggressive management of payables to mask underlying cash flow pressures. This inconsistency warrants further investigation into the sustainability of current working capital practices.
According to recent balance sheet disclosures, the debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 2.18x in 2026Q1 from 1.15x in 2024Q2, signaling a shift toward debt-funded growth that leaves the company with a more vulnerable balance sheet in a high-interest-rate environment.
The rapid increase in leverage, combined with a deteriorating current ratio, suggests that the company's financial cushion is thinning precisely when operational performance is under pressure. This trend may limit management's ability to pivot strategy or weather potential economic downturns without further straining its capital structure.
Market participants frequently over-rely on Comparable Restaurant Sales as the primary indicator of health, which obscures the rising costs of labor and food that are currently eroding the company's net margins, as evidenced by the recent decline in profitability metrics.
Focusing solely on top-line comps ignores the reality that growth in revenue does not necessarily translate to growth in shareholder value if the cost to acquire that revenue is rising faster. Analysts should instead prioritize restaurant-level operating margins and free cash flow conversion to better assess the true earning power of the business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CMG stock.
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 31.0x. The historical average is 50.7x. This places it at the 11th percentile of its historical range.
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 23.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 30.0x.
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 47.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 22.3%.
Based on historical data, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 31.0x. This is at the 11th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has 25.4% gross margin and 16.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.