Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -142.3%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | $16M | $57M | — | $4M | — | $1M | $2M | $372047 | — | $322634 |
| Enterprise Value | $-745129 | $14M | $56M | — | $4M | — | $1M | $2M | $462245 | — | $394458 |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.44 | — | 1034.62 | — | 16.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.17 | 1.74 | 6.59 | — | 5.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.38 | 5.42 | 71.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 503.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 503.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.50 | 6.55 | — | 5.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 334.43 | — | 22.43 | — | 8.23 | 15.27 | 6.15 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 335.14 | — | 22.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 500.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 4.8% | 4.8% | 12.2% | -0.9% | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -29.2% | -29.2% | 2.0% | -76.0% | 25.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -28.9% | -28.9% | 0.6% | -75.4% | 19.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -142.3% | -142.3% | 21.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -132.4% | -132.4% | 8.8% | -199.2% | 647.9% | -370.1% | -435.1% | -800.3% | -2314.5% | 223.0% | -638.9% |
| ROIC | -104.2% | -104.2% | 48.5% | — | — | — | -656.2% | -1084.9% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -141.1% | -141.1% | 65.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.01 | — | 1.02 | 1.18 | 2.05 | 1.57 | 1.23 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.77 | -0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -2.45 | — | 0.97 | 1.12 | 2.02 | 1.54 | 1.20 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -3.66 | -0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -227.83 |
Net cash position: cash ($2M) exceeds total debt ($119306)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 30.75 | 30.75 | 7.46 | 0.52 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 30.75 | 30.75 | 7.46 | 0.52 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 24.63 | 24.63 | 3.39 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.21 | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.95 | 9.45 | 1.41 | 33.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 0.1% | — | 6.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 0.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $2M | $473571 | $350021 | $352714 | $720957 | $722141 | $722141 | $185286 | $96022 |
Regulatory delisting and insolvency
As reported in financial statements, CIIT trades at a P/B of 0.52, which suggests the market is pricing the entity as a distressed shell rather than an operating business, reflecting deep skepticism regarding the underlying asset quality and the viability of a future reverse merger transaction.
The current P/B multiple of 0.52 indicates that investors are unwilling to pay book value for the company's assets, likely due to the high probability of further capital erosion. This valuation suggests that the market views the company's listing status as its primary asset, with little to no value assigned to its historical operational capabilities.
Based on reported figures, CIIT's ROE has been highly volatile, swinging from a 39.6% peak in 2024Q2 to a -39.7% trough in 2025Q4, which highlights the absence of a sustainable business model and the company's reliance on non-recurring adjustments to manage its bottom line.
The lack of net interest income means the DuPont decomposition is entirely driven by non-interest fee income and high operating expenses. The erratic profitability metrics suggest that the company is struggling to maintain even a baseline level of operational efficiency, rendering traditional ROE analysis largely ineffective for assessing long-term value.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's efficiency ratio reached a concerning 70.4% in 2025Q4, indicating that overhead costs are consuming a significant portion of the limited revenue generated during its transition phase, which warrants further investigation into the sustainability of current administrative spending levels.
The absence of NIM data confirms that CIIT does not function as a traditional depository institution, making the efficiency ratio a measure of administrative burden rather than operational leverage. The fluctuations in this ratio suggest that management is unable to control fixed costs relative to the highly variable and low-quality revenue streams.
As indicated by peer comparison data, CIIT's P/B of 0.52 sits in the lower quartile of its shell company peer group, suggesting that the market perceives a higher risk of regulatory delisting or total capital depletion compared to entities like Coda Octopus Group.
While peers like CLPS Incorporation also trade at significant discounts to book value, CIIT's lack of a clear operational pivot makes its valuation gap appear structural rather than cyclical. Investors should monitor whether the company's proximity to the Shenzhen tech ecosystem can bridge this valuation gap through a successful merger.
The most commonly misapplied metric for CIIT is the P/E ratio, which obscures the company's true financial distress by failing to account for the massive, non-recurring provisions that frequently distort net income and render earnings-based valuation models entirely meaningless for this specific shell entity.
Because CIIT's earnings are driven by accounting adjustments and asset impairments rather than core operational performance, the P/E ratio provides a false sense of valuation. Analysts should instead focus on the tangible book value per share and the cash burn rate to determine the remaining runway before the company requires additional dilutive financing.
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CIIT stock.
Tianci International, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.4x. The historical average is 16.8x.
Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -142.3%. The historical average is -58.1%.
Based on historical data, Tianci International, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Tianci International, Inc. has 4.8% gross margin and -29.2% operating margin.