Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -279.1%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $204M | $171M | $158M | $314M | $615M | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $589M | $468M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $156M | $122M | $302M | $692M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $619M | $442M | $1.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.15 | — | 5.52 | — | — | — | 10.73 | 14.64 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.85 | 4.05 | 0.59 | 1.22 | 2.91 | 3.69 | 3.05 | 3.70 | 378.26 | 300.50 | 6.21 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.29 | 2.80 | — | — | — | 12.32 | 5.16 | 12.52 | — | 15.99 | 64.89 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.88 | 85.24 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.41 | 46.47 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.90 | 1.13 | 2.69 | 4.89 | 3.69 | 2.79 | 3.73 | 398.01 | 284.11 | 6.08 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.23 | 11.97 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 5.43 | — | — | — | 8.46 | 12.33 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.03 | 85.95 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.9% | 57.9% | 56.0% | 38.2% | 66.8% | 82.4% | 92.1% | 95.2% | -107.9% | -10216.9% | -33.8% |
| Operating Margin | -425.7% | -425.7% | -41.8% | -79.0% | -121.7% | -80.8% | 32.9% | 30.3% | -13137.3% | -14918.8% | -61.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -403.8% | -403.8% | 10.7% | -92.5% | -138.2% | -87.9% | 27.8% | 25.2% | -13453.7% | -15306.6% | -67.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -279.1% | -279.1% | — | — | — | -151.6% | 68.5% | 269.7% | — | -1004.4% | -2418.6% |
| ROA | -48.2% | -48.2% | 5.3% | -42.8% | -50.3% | -37.8% | 21.1% | 35.3% | -159.8% | -139.6% | -65.2% |
| ROIC | -1103.8% | -1103.8% | -85.3% | -65.7% | -101.7% | -154.3% | 85.9% | 149.2% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -127.3% | -127.3% | -48.2% | -63.5% | -60.0% | -43.6% | 31.6% | 59.8% | -204.0% | -181.1% | -101.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.66 | 0.66 | — | — | — | 4.29 | 1.48 | 1.79 | — | 3.47 | 5.51 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.59 | 1.70 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.80 | — | — | — | 0.02 | -0.44 | 0.10 | — | -0.87 | -1.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.77 | 0.10 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.84 | 0.71 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -19.95 | -19.95 | 2.05 | -4.88 | -7.98 | -11.50 | 7.41 | 6.12 | -20.71 | -23.95 | -15.01 |
Net cash position: cash ($89M) exceeds total debt ($40M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.21 | 1.43 | 2.75 | 3.64 | 5.27 | 2.98 | 2.18 | 4.47 | 2.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.96 | 1.24 | 2.47 | 3.42 | 4.97 | 2.90 | 2.13 | 4.47 | 2.30 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 1.38 | 2.52 | 3.72 | 1.55 | 2.18 | 4.47 | 2.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.16 | 0.60 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.87 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.59 | 5.59 | 1.68 | 2.54 | 1.81 | 1.53 | 0.85 | 1.74 | 1.95 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 159.41 | 167.26 | 369.65 | 190.18 | 137.51 | 120.47 | 145.55 | — | — | 3.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 18.1% | — | — | — | 9.3% | 6.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10.1% | 1.2% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $120M | $115M | $94M | $78M | $75M | $83M | $73M | $65M | $53M | $42M |
Insufficient liquidity for operations
According to current market data, CHRS trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 4.35, a multiple that appears disconnected from the company's -84% revenue contraction and suggests investors are pricing the firm as a distressed turnaround play rather than a stable commercial entity with predictable future cash flows.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio and the reliance on P/S multiples highlight the market's difficulty in valuing a business currently undergoing a radical transformation. This valuation level implies that the market is assigning value to the novel immuno-oncology pipeline while heavily discounting the legacy biosimilar business, which remains burdened by structural pricing pressures.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's operating margin of -425.72% underscores a fundamental inability to achieve the necessary commercial scale to cover its high fixed-cost base, which is heavily weighted toward specialized oncology sales infrastructure and ongoing research and development for its novel pipeline.
While gross margins have shown some volatility, the persistent gap between gross profit and operating expenses suggests that the current business model is not yet self-sustaining. Investors should monitor whether the transition to a more concentrated oncology focus can eventually drive the operating leverage required to move toward break-even profitability.
Based on the provided financial data, the ROIC of -179.4% in 2026Q1 indicates that the company is currently destroying capital rather than compounding it, a trend that reflects the heavy R&D investment required to support its novel immuno-oncology programs against a backdrop of declining legacy revenue.
The negative return on capital metrics are consistent with a firm in the early stages of a high-risk pivot, where capital is being consumed to build future capabilities rather than generating returns on existing assets. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's pipeline can eventually deliver the clinical milestones necessary to justify such significant capital destruction.
According to quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, reaching 21 days in 2026Q1 after peaking at over 1,000 days in previous periods, which suggests that the company's working capital management remains highly sensitive to the unpredictable nature of biosimilar inventory and customer reimbursement cycles.
The extreme variability in DSO and DIO metrics highlights the operational challenges inherent in the buy-and-bill model, where the company is exposed to significant credit and inventory risks. This volatility complicates cash flow forecasting and suggests that the company's liquidity position is more fragile than a simple cash balance might imply.
The most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the P/E ratio, which obscures the company's true financial health by failing to account for the massive, non-recurring R&D and restructuring costs that currently render the firm's earnings power effectively non-existent in the eyes of traditional fundamental analysis.
Investors should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the progress of the OBI conversion, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the company's survival prospects than earnings-based multiples. Relying on P/E in this context is misleading because it ignores the structural transition from a biosimilar house to a novel oncology developer, which requires a completely different valuation framework.
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHRS stock.
Coherus Oncology, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.2x. The historical average is 10.3x.
Coherus Oncology, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -279.1%. The historical average is -90.4%.
Based on historical data, Coherus Oncology, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Coherus Oncology, Inc. has 57.9% gross margin and -425.7% operating margin.