Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 157.9x · EV/EBITDA 4.8x · ROE 0.5%. (2010–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.6B | $5.4B | $6.2B | $7.2B | $4.4B | $2.6B | $741M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7.9B | $6.7B | $7.2B | $7.4B | $4.3B | $2.9B | $1.0B | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 157.89 | 125.27 | 7.30 | 7.07 | 2.38 | 8.14 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.36 | 1.10 | 1.17 | 1.85 | 1.21 | 1.65 | 0.68 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.84 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 1.42 | 0.94 | 2.13 | 0.73 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 9.56 | 7.74 | 6.72 | 7.89 | 3.17 | 3.72 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 3.25 | 2.63 | 2.94 | 3.96 | 2.29 | 2.85 | 2.48 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.91 | 1.18 | 1.81 | 0.93 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.76 | 4.00 | 3.25 | 3.97 | 2.21 | 2.96 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 40.00 | 20.63 | 6.14 | 5.43 | 3.05 | 13.10 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.64 | 7.81 | 8.13 | 3.09 | 4.10 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 6.5% | 24.9% | 36.9% | 49.1% | 42.4% | 22.2% | 4.2% | 26.8% | 95.6% | 96.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 4.1% | 20.9% | 32.7% | 43.4% | 51.2% | -449.8% | -4.7% | 5.1% | 11.5% | -18.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.9% | 0.9% | 16.2% | 26.3% | 50.9% | 20.2% | -340.6% | -6.6% | -1.5% | 9.9% | -71.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.5% | 0.5% | 12.3% | 21.0% | 62.9% | 28.6% | -152.2% | -3.3% | -0.9% | 3.8% | -19.1% |
| ROA | 0.3% | 0.3% | 8.5% | 15.1% | 38.4% | 12.3% | -76.4% | -1.7% | -0.5% | 1.9% | -8.3% |
| ROIC | 1.6% | 1.6% | 11.0% | 19.3% | 39.2% | 43.8% | -92.9% | -1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | -2.0% |
| ROCE | 1.7% | 1.7% | 12.9% | 23.1% | 44.8% | 44.7% | -111.8% | -1.3% | 1.8% | 2.3% | -2.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.47 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.45 | — | 3.97 | 3.62 | 3.11 | 6.65 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.04 | -0.02 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.78 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.46 | 0.12 | -0.05 | 0.27 | — | 3.95 | 3.59 | 3.08 | 6.62 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.90 | 1.10 | 0.24 | -0.07 | 0.38 | — | 116.36 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 4.04 | 4.04 | 20.68 | 47.77 | 48.14 | 7.10 | -26.84 | -1.13 | 0.83 | 0.48 | -1.65 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.94 | 1.22 | 1.09 | 1.32 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.63 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.88 | 1.16 | 1.05 | 1.29 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.60 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | 39.43 | 39.43 | 41.84 | 33.89 | 34.12 | 31.42 | 39.00 | 52.49 | 51.27 | 2.83 | 2.44 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 83.57 | 90.29 | 88.34 | 78.24 | 87.14 | 68.14 | 70.17 | 60.93 | 106.30 | 105.84 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.7% | 5.9% | 8.6% | 6.9% | 7.9% | 4.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 714.7% | 714.7% | 62.4% | 48.9% | 18.7% | 35.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.6% | 0.8% | 13.7% | 14.1% | 42.1% | 12.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.5% | 12.9% | 14.9% | 12.7% | 31.6% | 26.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 5.5% | 6.8% | 7.2% | 3.3% | 4.4% | 3.8% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.2% | 12.7% | 15.8% | 10.3% | 12.3% | 8.1% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $58M | $53M | $43M | $32M | $21M | $20M | $20M | $315M | $238M | $184M |
Bakken regional pricing volatility
Based on reported figures, CHRD trades at a forward P/E of 5.39x, which, when compared to the TTM P/E of 157.55x, suggests that the market is pricing in significant earnings recovery rather than aggressive long-term growth, consistent with a harvest-oriented profile in a mature basin.
The stark contrast between trailing and forward multiples indicates that investors are heavily discounting the volatility seen in recent quarters. This valuation appears to favor yield-focused investors, as the 4.7% dividend yield suggests the market views the company as a cash-generative utility rather than a high-growth exploration play.
According to recent financial data, ROIC has trended downward to 2.7% in 2026Q1 from a peak of 4.9% in 2023Q4, indicating that the company is struggling to compound returns on its expanded asset base following the recent wave of inorganic growth and consolidation activities.
The decline in ROIC suggests that the capital intensity required to maintain production in the Williston Basin is currently outpacing the returns generated by new well completions. Investors should monitor whether management can improve capital efficiency through synergy realization or if the asset base remains structurally dilutive to returns.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has remained elevated, reaching 70 days in 2026Q1, which reflects a persistent drag on liquidity compared to the more streamlined operational cycles observed in earlier periods before the recent large-scale merger integration efforts were fully realized.
The high DSO of 67 days suggests that the company may lack significant leverage over its midstream and downstream counterparties, forcing it to carry a larger working capital burden. This inefficiency appears to be a structural feature of the current operational scale, warranting further investigation into potential improvements.
Based on reported figures, CHRD maintains a disciplined debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19, which provides a robust buffer against commodity price volatility and positions the company favorably compared to more levered peers in the exploration and production sector who face higher interest coverage risks.
The low leverage profile suggests that the company is well-positioned to navigate potential downturns without the immediate threat of covenant breaches. This conservative stance appears to be a deliberate management choice to prioritize balance sheet health over aggressive debt-funded expansion in a volatile pricing environment.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to CHRD, as it fails to account for the significant non-cash DD&A charges and derivative settlements that distort net income, making the EV/EBITDA multiple a far more reliable metric for assessing the company's true operational cash-generative capacity.
Using P/E in an E&P context obscures the underlying cash flow reality, as it treats capital-intensive depletion as a standard operating expense. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA and P/FCF to better understand the company's ability to fund dividends and capital expenditures without relying on external financing.
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHRD stock.
Chord Energy Corporation's current P/E ratio is 157.9x. The historical average is 30.0x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Chord Energy Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 4.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 3.3x.
Chord Energy Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 0.5%. The historical average is 2.1%.
Based on historical data, Chord Energy Corporation is trading at a P/E of 157.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Chord Energy Corporation's current dividend yield is 4.70% with a payout ratio of 714.7%.
Chord Energy Corporation has 6.5% gross margin and 4.1% operating margin.
Chord Energy Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.