Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.1x · EV/EBITDA 16.5x · ROE 7.8%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $718M | $441M | $409M | $348M | $408M | $405M | $283M | $625M | $391M | $458M | $346M |
| Enterprise Value | $792M | $515M | $348M | $687M | $560M | $135M | $76M | $509M | $97M | $189M | $-348284309 |
| P/E Ratio → | 23.09 | 14.04 | 16.59 | 14.97 | 8.17 | 12.83 | — | 23.49 | 33.10 | — | 21.63 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.82 | 1.73 | 1.71 | 1.64 | 2.28 | 2.59 | 1.73 | 3.71 | 2.48 | 3.17 | 2.36 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.73 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 0.99 | 1.24 | 0.99 | 0.64 | 1.32 | 0.90 | 1.06 | 0.80 |
| P/FCF | 22.58 | 13.88 | 14.19 | 9.42 | 6.29 | 5.87 | — | 20.94 | 11.24 | 11.24 | 10.89 |
| P/OCF | 18.02 | 11.08 | 11.07 | 7.45 | 5.76 | 5.23 | 36.71 | 16.32 | 7.92 | 10.34 | 10.61 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.02 | 1.45 | 3.24 | 3.12 | 0.86 | 0.46 | 3.02 | 0.62 | 1.31 | -2.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.54 | 10.76 | 9.17 | 19.64 | 8.26 | 3.21 | — | 15.37 | 5.41 | — | -16.66 |
| EV / EBIT | 19.79 | 12.87 | 11.26 | 23.91 | 9.07 | 3.77 | — | 18.32 | 6.80 | — | -19.76 |
| EV / FCF | — | 16.19 | 12.07 | 18.60 | 8.62 | 1.95 | — | 17.06 | 2.80 | 4.64 | -10.95 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 61.7% | 57.3% | 62.0% | 87.1% | 84.1% | 67.1% | 70.2% | 65.2% | 44.4% | 56.3% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 15.7% | 12.9% | 13.6% | 34.4% | 22.8% | -27.5% | 16.5% | 9.1% | -12.6% | 12.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.3% | 12.3% | 10.2% | 11.0% | 28.0% | 20.2% | -28.0% | 15.8% | 7.5% | -0.5% | 10.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.8% | 7.8% | 6.7% | 6.9% | 13.6% | 7.5% | -10.0% | 5.8% | 2.7% | -0.2% | 3.7% |
| ROA | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 1.2% | 0.8% | -1.1% | 0.7% | 0.3% | -0.0% | 0.3% |
| ROIC | 5.7% | 5.7% | 3.9% | 3.4% | 9.8% | 6.0% | -7.1% | 4.5% | 2.5% | -3.2% | 3.1% |
| ROCE | 7.0% | 7.0% | 4.8% | 4.3% | 12.5% | 7.7% | -9.0% | 5.8% | 3.2% | -4.1% | 4.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.18 | 1.12 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.02 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.73 | 3.73 | 1.85 | 11.25 | 2.93 | 0.17 | — | 0.30 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.17 | -0.16 | 0.96 | 0.46 | -0.66 | -0.47 | -0.24 | -0.67 | -0.62 | -1.60 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.53 | 1.53 | -1.61 | 9.69 | 2.24 | -6.46 | — | -3.50 | -16.33 | — | -33.23 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.31 | -2.12 | 9.18 | 2.34 | -3.92 | — | -3.88 | -8.45 | -6.60 | -21.84 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 3.05 | 1.57 | -1.26 | 0.59 | 0.38 | -0.49 | 0.38 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.3% | — | — | — | 2.3% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 49.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.3% | 7.1% | 6.0% | 6.7% | 12.2% | 7.8% | — | 4.3% | 3.0% | — | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | 4.4% | 7.2% | 7.0% | 10.6% | 15.9% | 17.0% | — | 4.8% | 8.9% | 8.9% | 9.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.8% | 4.5% | 0.0% | 4.7% | 10.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.8% | 4.5% | 0.0% | 4.7% | 10.5% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $22M | $23M | $23M | $25M | $26M | $26M | $26M | $26M | $26M | $26M |
Commercial real estate concentration
According to recent market data, CARE trades at a P/B of 1.80, which appears to incorporate a significant complexity discount relative to regional peers, likely reflecting investor apprehension regarding the bank's historical credit volatility and the potential for future idiosyncratic losses within its concentrated commercial loan portfolio.
The valuation multiple suggests that the market remains skeptical of the bank's core earnings power, viewing the recent uptick in profitability as potentially non-recurring rather than a structural shift. Investors should monitor whether the forward P/E of 6.15 indicates an undervalued franchise or a value trap where the market anticipates further credit-related earnings dilution.
Based on the 2026Q1 financial results, the bank's ROE surged to 18.6%, a dramatic departure from historical single-digit levels that appears driven by a significant, potentially non-recurring, contribution from non-interest income rather than a sustainable expansion in core net interest margins or operational leverage.
The decomposition of profitability indicates that the bank's recent performance is heavily reliant on fee-based revenue, which accounted for 54.5% of total revenue in the most recent quarter. This shift warrants further investigation into whether this represents a permanent change in the business model or a temporary gain that masks underlying margin compression in the core lending business.
As reported in the quarterly filings, the efficiency ratio improved to 23.8% in 2026Q1, a sharp deviation from the 40-50% range observed over the prior two years, suggesting either a successful optimization of the branch network or the impact of one-time revenue items on the cost-to-income calculation.
While the headline efficiency ratio appears strong, the bank's reliance on a 69-branch physical footprint suggests that structural overhead remains high. Analysts should be cautious in extrapolating this efficiency gain, as it may be decoupled from the bank's actual operating cost structure and could revert if non-interest income normalizes.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, the equity-to-assets ratio of 0.11 in 2026Q1 underscores a highly conservative capital posture, which provides a substantial buffer against credit impairments but simultaneously acts as a drag on the bank's ability to generate higher returns on equity for shareholders.
The bank's decision to maintain such a robust capital position suggests a management priority on de-risking the balance sheet in the face of persistent commercial credit disputes. While this approach enhances stability, it may limit the bank's capacity for aggressive capital return programs until management is confident that the legacy credit issues are fully resolved.
The most commonly misapplied metric for Carter Bankshares is the P/E ratio, which is frequently distorted by large, non-recurring provisions for credit losses that decouple headline earnings from the bank's actual operational performance and core franchise value in the Virginia and North Carolina markets.
Investors should prioritize P/TBV over P/E, as the latter is highly sensitive to management's discretionary provisioning decisions and idiosyncratic legal expenses. Using P/TBV provides a more stable valuation anchor that accounts for the bank's tangible capital base and better reflects the underlying value of its deposit franchise.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CARE stock.
Carter Bankshares, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 23.1x. The historical average is 14.1x. This places it at the 88th percentile of its historical range.
Carter Bankshares, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.5x.
Carter Bankshares, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.8%. The historical average is 5.7%.
Based on historical data, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 23.1x. This is at the 88th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Carter Bankshares, Inc. has 61.7% gross margin and 15.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Carter Bankshares, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.