Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -9.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -46.6%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.0B | $1.3B | $486M | $131M | $95M | $68M | $53M | $5M | $12M | $42M | $49M |
| Enterprise Value | $759M | $1.1B | $476M | $118M | $88M | $36M | $21M | $850752 | $8M | $36M | $60M |
| P/E Ratio → | -9.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.56 | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | 21.82 | 5.20 | 37.15 | 276.24 | 172.15 | 4.73 | 7.22 | 15.88 | 15.47 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.41 | 4.39 | 3.34 | 5.79 | 8.04 | 2.16 | 1.89 | 0.69 | 2.61 | 3.77 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 60.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 19.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | 21.38 | 4.71 | 34.38 | 145.52 | 67.88 | 0.85 | 4.67 | 13.57 | 18.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.79 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 56.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | -124.4% | -44.8% | -755.1% | 100.0% | 100.0% | -411.6% | 100.0% | 100.0% | -377.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -191.1% | -95.6% | -1163.9% | -8549.9% | -4412.6% | -769.5% | -917.2% | -482.4% | -532.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | -181.7% | -88.5% | -1137.4% | -8175.9% | -4401.9% | -760.4% | -909.1% | 91.2% | -589.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -46.6% | -46.6% | -48.2% | -129.6% | -134.5% | -67.2% | -78.0% | -133.4% | -191.8% | 67.3% | — |
| ROA | -39.9% | -39.9% | -35.3% | -41.0% | -63.5% | -52.7% | -59.7% | -75.1% | -119.0% | 13.9% | -108.0% |
| ROIC | -93.0% | -93.0% | -43.8% | -242.6% | -1087.6% | — | — | -351.9% | -422.4% | -163.7% | -275.2% |
| ROCE | -46.1% | -46.1% | -48.1% | -89.2% | -93.2% | -60.8% | -65.4% | -85.0% | -135.7% | -90.4% | -145.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.87 | -0.07 | -0.55 | -0.60 | -1.02 | -1.15 | -0.57 | -0.92 | -0.55 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | -4.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -35.51 | -35.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.10 | -49.26 |
Net cash position: cash ($288M) exceeds total debt ($21M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.01 | 9.01 | 7.77 | 1.63 | 1.82 | 8.82 | 11.33 | 11.74 | 6.75 | 9.40 | 3.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.01 | 9.01 | 7.77 | 1.63 | 1.82 | 8.82 | 11.33 | 11.74 | 6.75 | 9.40 | 3.70 |
| Cash Ratio | 8.88 | 8.88 | 7.21 | 1.26 | 1.76 | 8.44 | 10.99 | 11.01 | 5.78 | 8.45 | 3.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | 0.13 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 169.93 | 150.36 | 78.33 | 583.87 | 65.88 | 31.95 | 44.75 | 47.18 | 25.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.7% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 1.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $46M | $35M | $27M | $25M | $23M | $16M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $2M |
Binary Clinical Trial Outcome
Based on reported financial data, Capricor's price-to-book ratio of 4.02 reflects a market premium that appears heavily contingent on the successful BLA submission for CAP-1002, rather than any current earnings-based valuation, as the company remains pre-revenue and continues to report negative P/E multiples.
The current valuation multiple suggests that investors are pricing in the potential for a successful regulatory outcome rather than historical financial performance. Given the lack of revenue, traditional valuation metrics like P/E or EV/EBITDA are effectively meaningless, and the P/B ratio serves primarily as a proxy for the market's confidence in the company's intellectual property and clinical pipeline.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -23.6% in 2026Q1, which underscores the significant capital intensity required to sustain the HOPE-3 trial and the ongoing manufacturing scale-up efforts ahead of any potential commercialization.
The persistent negative return on invested capital is a structural characteristic of a clinical-stage biotech firm that has yet to achieve commercial scale. Investors should monitor whether the recent investments in manufacturing infrastructure eventually yield a positive return, or if the high cost of allogeneic cell therapy production continues to suppress capital efficiency.
According to recent SEC filings, the company maintains a strong liquidity position with a current ratio of 8.42 as of 2026Q1, providing a substantial cash cushion that appears sufficient to fund operations through critical clinical milestones without the immediate need for dilutive financing.
This high current ratio is a direct result of recent capital raises and is essential for a company that lacks recurring revenue to cover its high R&D burn. While this liquidity provides a safety net, it also highlights the company's reliance on external capital markets to sustain its long-term development strategy.
Based on reported figures, Capricor maintains a conservative capital structure with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.08, suggesting that the firm has avoided significant leverage while relying primarily on equity-based financing to fund its extensive research and development activities.
The low debt level is appropriate for a pre-revenue biotechnology company, as it minimizes interest expense and avoids the restrictive covenants that could otherwise impede operational agility. This structure allows management to focus entirely on clinical execution without the pressure of servicing debt obligations during the high-risk development phase.
Investors frequently misapply net margin and P/E ratios to Capricor, which obscures the reality that these metrics are irrelevant for a pre-revenue firm where R&D spending is a strategic investment rather than an operational expense to be minimized for short-term profit.
Using standard profitability ratios for a company in the clinical development stage can lead to erroneous conclusions about operational health. A more appropriate focus would be the 'cash runway' or 'net loss per clinical milestone,' which better capture the efficiency of capital allocation in a business model defined by binary regulatory outcomes.
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CAPR stock.
Capricor Therapeutics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -9.9x. The historical average is 17.6x.
Capricor Therapeutics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -46.6%. The historical average is -137.4%.
Based on historical data, Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -9.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.