Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6250.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2022–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $423M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $383M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -6250.00 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -77.6% | -101.2% |
| ROA | -112.6% | -112.6% | -77.6% | -101.2% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | — | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Quick Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $26M | $26M | $26M |
Statutory liquidation deadline pressure
As reported in recent financial filings, CAEP's TTM P/E ratio of -6250.00 reflects the absence of operational earnings, suggesting that market pricing is currently driven by the speculative value of the sponsor's deal-making pipeline rather than any underlying fundamental performance metrics or historical earnings growth.
The extreme negative P/E multiple is a structural artifact of a pre-combination shell company and should not be interpreted as a traditional valuation signal. Investors appear to be pricing the entity as a cash-equivalent vehicle with an embedded call option, where the valuation is tethered to the trust account value rather than earnings multiples.
Based on 2024Q2 reported figures, CAEP's ROIC of -166.2% highlights the severe erosion of invested capital as the entity consumes sponsor-provided funds to cover fixed administrative costs while failing to generate any productive returns on its capital base prior to a business combination.
The deeply negative ROIC trend underscores the lack of operational efficiency inherent in the SPAC model during the search phase. This decay in capital returns is expected to persist until a target is acquired, at which point the return profile will shift to reflect the economics of the underlying business.
According to 2025Q2 financial statements, CAEP maintains a current ratio of 8.42, which appears robust on the surface but warrants further investigation given the entity's reliance on external sponsor capital to meet ongoing regulatory and administrative obligations in the absence of any recurring revenue streams.
While the high current ratio suggests an ability to cover short-term liabilities, this metric is misleading because the majority of assets are restricted within the trust account. The true liquidity risk lies in the entity's inability to generate internal cash flow, making it entirely dependent on the sponsor's willingness to fund operations.
As indicated by the financial data, the most commonly misapplied ratio for CAEP is the Net Margin, which obscures the entity's true financial health by failing to account for the non-cash volatility of warrant liabilities and the mandatory nature of fixed administrative expenses in a shell structure.
Analysts should prioritize monitoring the cash burn rate and the remaining time to the statutory liquidation deadline rather than traditional profitability ratios. Using net margins to evaluate a pre-combination SPAC is fundamentally flawed, as it treats necessary compliance costs as operational failures rather than the required price of maintaining a public listing.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CAEP stock.
Cantor Equity Partners III, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares's current P/E ratio is -6250.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Cantor Equity Partners III, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares is trading at a P/E of -6250.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.