Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.0x · EV/EBITDA 5.9x · ROE -4.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $130M | $133M | $145M | $367M | $377M | $698M | $640M | $659M | $513M | $359M | $224M |
| Enterprise Value | $221M | $224M | $247M | $500M | $519M | $852M | $631M | $664M | $541M | $368M | $233M |
| P/E Ratio → | -7.04 | — | — | 17.43 | 27.00 | — | — | 19.71 | 17.22 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 2.68 | 2.79 | 1.66 | 1.57 | 1.86 | 1.41 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 1.25 | 3.25 | 3.83 | 3.82 | 3.40 | 1.99 |
| P/FCF | 3.51 | 3.60 | 4.93 | 7.35 | 14.29 | — | 38.75 | 17.62 | — | 640.62 | 17.94 |
| P/OCF | 2.43 | 2.49 | 3.10 | 5.57 | 8.38 | — | 21.07 | 10.20 | 18.58 | 53.27 | 12.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 3.28 | 2.76 | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.91 | 1.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.89 | 5.98 | — | 5.11 | 6.39 | 82.81 | 62.61 | 9.72 | 11.53 | — | 42.46 |
| EV / EBIT | 63.60 | — | — | 8.41 | 17.21 | — | — | 8.44 | 14.95 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 6.05 | 8.41 | 10.00 | 19.70 | — | 38.25 | 17.76 | — | 656.67 | 18.69 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 22.2% | 23.4% | 29.5% | 28.4% | 22.9% | 24.8% | 36.5% | 33.9% | 30.8% | 24.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.6% | 0.6% | -20.4% | 8.5% | 4.6% | -0.9% | -0.4% | 14.7% | 11.5% | -6.4% | -3.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.9% | -2.9% | -24.7% | 3.0% | 2.2% | -1.8% | -0.6% | 8.6% | 9.3% | -9.8% | -4.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -4.1% | -4.1% | -30.6% | 3.7% | 2.5% | -1.2% | -0.8% | 22.2% | 25.4% | -17.3% | -5.6% |
| ROA | -2.7% | -2.7% | -20.4% | 2.4% | 1.6% | -0.8% | -0.5% | 13.1% | 14.7% | -11.2% | -3.8% |
| ROIC | 0.5% | 0.5% | -15.5% | 6.4% | 3.2% | -0.4% | -0.4% | 25.8% | 20.3% | -7.8% | -3.0% |
| ROCE | 0.6% | 0.6% | -20.0% | 8.1% | 4.0% | -0.5% | -0.5% | 30.6% | 24.7% | -9.5% | -3.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.28 | 3.28 | — | 1.67 | 2.07 | 18.03 | 1.98 | 0.38 | 0.88 | — | 2.86 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.28 | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.42 | 2.42 | — | 1.35 | 1.76 | 15.04 | -0.82 | 0.08 | 0.60 | — | 1.70 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.45 | 3.48 | 2.65 | 5.41 | — | -0.50 | 0.14 | — | 16.04 | 0.75 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.18 | -0.18 | -15.27 | 6.24 | 4.88 | -7.40 | -1.68 | 50.64 | 22.43 | -8.27 | -4.35 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.53 | 2.58 | 2.24 | 2.26 | 3.04 | 2.02 | 2.05 | 2.19 | 2.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.20 | 1.27 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 1.93 | 1.27 | 1.26 | 1.41 | 1.45 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 1.14 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.30 | 0.82 | 1.43 | 1.36 | 1.11 | 0.98 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.28 | 3.28 | 3.23 | 3.04 | 2.99 | 1.62 | 3.28 | 4.70 | 4.22 | 3.73 | 4.16 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 56.08 | 58.69 | 53.90 | 52.69 | 100.94 | 49.96 | 55.87 | 66.76 | 93.65 | 75.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 1.7% | — | — | — | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.1% | 3.9% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 5.7% | 3.7% | — | — | 5.1% | 5.8% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 28.5% | 27.8% | 20.3% | 13.6% | 7.0% | — | 2.6% | 5.7% | — | 0.2% | 5.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.9% | 0.9% | 2.6% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M | $20M | $20M | $19M | $18M | $15M | $15M | $15M | $14M | $14M |
Cyclical Revenue Contraction
Based on recent market data, BOOM trades at a P/S ratio of 0.20, which appears to reflect a significant conglomerate discount as investors struggle to reconcile the disparate valuation profiles of its energy-focused perforating business and its interest-rate-sensitive architectural building products segment in the current environment.
The negative P/E of -6.72 renders traditional earnings-based valuation metrics largely irrelevant, forcing investors to rely on EV/EBITDA or P/S multiples. This valuation suggests the market is pricing in a permanent impairment of the Arcadia acquisition rather than a cyclical recovery, warranting further investigation into whether a divestiture could unlock hidden value.
According to reported financial statements, BOOM's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -0.5% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently failing to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital, a sharp reversal from the positive compounding observed in earlier periods.
The decline in ROIC is primarily driven by the compression of operating margins rather than asset turnover, suggesting that the company's fixed-cost manufacturing base is underutilized. Investors should monitor whether the ongoing strategic review leads to a rationalization of capital-intensive assets that are currently dragging down overall returns.
As indicated by the latest quarterly data, BOOM's cash conversion cycle has expanded to 145 days in 2026Q1, primarily driven by a bloated inventory position of 127 days, which suggests that the company is struggling to align its production output with the current cooling demand environment.
The elevated DIO relative to historical norms implies that the company may be holding obsolete inventory, particularly within the DynaEnergetics segment. This inefficiency ties up critical liquidity and warrants further investigation into whether management can successfully liquidate these holdings without resorting to significant price concessions that would further erode margins.
Based on reported figures, BOOM maintains a conservative capital structure with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.08 as of 2026Q1, providing a necessary buffer against the current period of negative operating cash flow and the ongoing volatility in its core energy and industrial end markets.
While the low leverage is a positive indicator of financial health, the negative interest coverage ratio of -2.79 suggests that the company's current earnings are insufficient to service its debt obligations comfortably. This warrants monitoring, as the company may need to rely on its cash reserves if the current cyclical downturn persists.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for BOOM, as it obscures the company's true cash-generating capacity by including significant non-cash amortization charges related to the Arcadia acquisition, which do not reflect the actual operational performance of the underlying business segments.
Investors should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or free cash flow yield to better understand the company's ability to generate cash from its manufacturing operations. Relying on P/E in this context may lead to an overly pessimistic view of the company's valuation, as it fails to account for the potential for margin expansion if fixed costs are successfully rationalized.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BOOM stock.
DMC Global Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -7.0x. The historical average is 34.8x.
DMC Global Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.4x.
DMC Global Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -4.1%. The historical average is 6.6%.
Based on historical data, DMC Global Inc. is trading at a P/E of -7.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
DMC Global Inc. has 22.2% gross margin and 0.6% operating margin.
DMC Global Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.