Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -282.6%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $75M | $10M | $3M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $77M | $12M | $6M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -7.80 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 271.56 | 36.90 | 32.12 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 19.43 | 2.93 | 1.21 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 45.04 | 63.74 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -2778.2% | -2778.2% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4589.3% | -4589.3% | -36550.7% | -33173.9% | -7826.6% | -11063.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3135.2% | -3135.2% | -33786.4% | -33318.0% | -4321.9% | -11067.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -282.6% | -282.6% | -331.5% | -7.4% | -0.2% | -0.3% |
| ROA | -51.6% | -51.6% | -167.9% | -7.0% | -0.2% | -0.3% |
| ROIC | -164.7% | -164.7% | -235.8% | -5.6% | -0.3% | — |
| ROCE | -300.9% | -300.9% | -320.5% | -7.1% | -0.4% | -0.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.25 | 0.08 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.65 | 1.19 | -0.02 | -0.00 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -30.76 | -30.76 | -165.13 | -206.58 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.60 | 0.05 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.60 | 0.05 | 1.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.54 | 0.04 | 0.84 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 331.83 | 123.95 | 103.66 | 35.00 | 2709.18 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $3M | $3M | $4M | $3M |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
According to recent market data, BNAI trades at a P/S multiple of 322.10, a valuation that appears disconnected from the company's negligible revenue base and suggests investors are pricing in a level of commercial success that remains entirely unproven in current financial disclosures.
The extreme P/S ratio implies that the market is valuing the firm as a high-growth SaaS entity rather than a pre-commercial consultancy. This valuation warrants extreme caution, as it assumes a rapid scaling of revenue that is not supported by the current pilot-heavy business model.
Based on reported financial statements, BNAI's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -39.9% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its heavy investment in proprietary AI infrastructure and human-like avatar development.
The persistent negative returns on capital suggest that the underlying technology stack is not yet generating sufficient economic value to cover its own cost of development. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward a more capital-efficient model before the current resource base is fully exhausted.
As reported in recent filings, BNAI's DSO has fluctuated wildly, reaching 164 days in 2026Q1, which suggests significant challenges in converting pilot-based service engagements into actual cash inflows, further straining the company's already limited liquidity position compared to industry standards for software infrastructure firms.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle reflects a business model that is struggling to standardize its billing and collection processes. This inefficiency implies that the company lacks the leverage to dictate terms to its customers, potentially forcing it to rely on external financing for daily operations.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, BNAI's current ratio of 0.43 as of 2026Q1 highlights a severe liquidity shortfall, indicating that the company lacks the necessary current assets to meet its short-term obligations without immediate and potentially dilutive access to external capital markets.
The low quick ratio confirms that the company is highly dependent on its limited cash reserves, which are insufficient to sustain operations under even moderate stress. This vulnerability suggests that the firm faces a high risk of insolvency if it cannot secure additional funding or achieve rapid revenue growth.
Investors frequently misapply SaaS-based P/S multiples to BNAI, which obscures the reality that the company currently functions as a high-cost, project-based consultancy with negative gross margins rather than a scalable software platform with high operating leverage and predictable recurring revenue streams.
Using P/S as a primary valuation tool for BNAI is misleading because it ignores the massive compute costs required to render real-time avatars, which are fundamentally different from the low-marginal-cost delivery of traditional software. A more appropriate metric would be a burn-adjusted cash-to-revenue ratio to assess the firm's true runway.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BNAI stock.
Brand Engagement Network, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -7.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Brand Engagement Network, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -282.6%. The historical average is -124.4%.
Based on historical data, Brand Engagement Network, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -7.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Brand Engagement Network, Inc. has -2778.2% gross margin and -4589.3% operating margin.