Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -62.1%. (2021–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $165187 | $11M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-534276 | $-98403985 | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.01 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.12 | 0.05 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.02 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.45 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 30.1% | 35.1% | 27.6% | 24.4% |
| Operating Margin | -84.5% | -84.5% | -11.6% | 4.7% | -3.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -100.5% | -100.5% | -12.3% | 0.2% | -4.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -62.1% | -62.1% | -13.2% | 2.2% | -30.5% |
| ROA | -42.4% | -42.4% | -7.7% | 0.3% | -4.6% |
| ROIC | -49.8% | -49.8% | -14.8% | — | -30.3% |
| ROCE | -49.5% | -49.5% | -11.1% | 25.5% | -11.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.78 | 1.68 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 1.98 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.23 | -0.19 | -4.33 | -0.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | -4.79 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -0.89 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -377.08 | -377.08 | -8.64 | 87.45 | -35.36 |
Net cash position: cash ($149M) exceeds total debt ($39M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.81 | 2.81 | 3.94 | 1.24 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.81 | 2.81 | 3.94 | 1.24 | 1.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.47 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.30 | 0.41 | 1.50 | 1.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 358.41 | 84.23 | 35.01 | 99.39 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M |
Unsustainable Operating Margin Burn
As reported in financial statements, BLMZ's gross margin has fluctuated significantly, reaching 27.7% in 2024Q2, while the operating margin remains deeply negative at -84.49%, suggesting that the company's current cost structure is failing to scale effectively despite the aggressive top-line growth observed in recent periods.
The persistent gap between gross profit and operating income indicates that SG&A expenses are disproportionately high, likely driven by the costs of talent acquisition and platform marketing. Investors should monitor whether these expenses are truly variable or if they represent a fixed cost burden that will continue to suppress profitability as the company attempts to scale.
Based on the company's reported figures, the ROIC has deteriorated to -15.4% as of 2024Q2, reflecting a fundamental inability to generate positive returns on the capital deployed into its educational and production infrastructure compared to historical performance levels observed in earlier fiscal periods.
The negative return on capital suggests that the company is currently destroying value with every dollar invested into its operations. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the recent capital allocation toward virtual talent management is yielding the expected long-term IP assets or if it is merely funding short-term operational deficits.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained suppressed at 0.29, highlighting a significant underutilization of its fixed asset base and a lack of operational efficiency when compared to the broader specialty business services sector benchmarks.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, characterized by extreme swings in days sales outstanding, suggests that the company faces significant challenges in managing its receivables and supplier relationships. This lack of working capital discipline appears to be a structural drag on the company's ability to maintain a stable liquidity position.
As indicated by the company's reported figures, the debt-to-equity ratio remains low at 0.08, which provides a superficial sense of balance sheet strength despite the underlying operational losses that continue to erode the firm's equity base over the last several quarters.
While the minimal debt load reduces immediate refinancing risk, the company's reliance on equity-funded growth is becoming increasingly unsustainable given the negative net margins. Investors should monitor whether management will be forced to seek additional capital if the current cash burn rate persists without a clear path to profitability.
Based on the reported figures, the P/S ratio of 0.12 is frequently misapplied to BLMZ, as it obscures the fact that the company's revenue growth is driven by high-cost, low-margin production services rather than high-margin, scalable digital IP licensing models.
Using a simple revenue multiple fails to account for the massive operating losses and the potential for rapid decay in VTuber-related revenue streams. A more appropriate metric would be an adjusted EBITDA or a contribution margin analysis that strips out the non-recurring costs associated with talent launches and marketing.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BLMZ stock.
Harrison Global Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Harrison Global Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -62.1%. The historical average is -25.9%.
Based on historical data, Harrison Global Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Harrison Global Holdings Inc. has 30.1% gross margin and -84.5% operating margin.